Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 78–84 | Cite as

Effects of Menstrual Cycle Phase on Face Preferences

  • Benedict C. JonesEmail author
  • Lisa M. DeBruine
  • David I. Perrett
  • Anthony C. Little
  • David R. Feinberg
  • Miriam J. Law Smith


While many studies of face preferences have emphasized high agreement among individuals about the types of faces they consider attractive and unattractive, other studies have demonstrated systematic variation in face preferences. Here, we review the evidence that women’s preferences for masculinity, apparent health, and self-resemblance in faces change systematically during the menstrual cycle. Our review focuses on the proximate mechanisms that might underpin these changes (i.e., what changes in hormone levels are important for effects of menstrual cycle phase) and the possible functions of these changes (i.e., to maximize the likelihood that offspring inherit strong immune systems or to increase the likelihood of successful pregnancy by either promoting affiliation with individuals who will provide support and care during pregnancy or by promoting strategies to avoid contagion during social interactions). While evidence that differentiates between these two accounts of the function of cyclic shifts in face preferences is currently equivocal for masculinity preferences, there is compelling evidence that the function of the effects of menstrual cycle phase on preferences for apparent health and self-resemblance in faces is to increase the likelihood of successful pregnancy.


Facial attractiveness Social perception Mate preferences Hormones Menstrual cycle 


  1. Alexander, G. M., Sherwin, B. B. B., Bancroft, J., & Davidson, D. W. (1990). Testosterone and sexual behaviour in oral contraceptive users and non-users: A prospective study. Hormones and Behavior, 24, 388–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bloch, M., Schmidt, P. J., Su, T. T.-P., Tobin, M. B., & Rubinow, D. R. (1998). Pituitary-adrenal hormones and testosterone across the menstrual cycle in women with premenstrual syndrome and controls. Biological Psychiatry, 43, 897–903.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bittles, A. H., Grant, J. C., Sullivan, S. G., & Hussain, R. (2002). Does inbreeding lead to decreased human fertility? Annals of Human Biology, 29, 111–130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Conway, C. A., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Welling, L. L. M., Law Smith, M. J., Perrett, D. I., et al. (2007). Salience of emotional displays of danger and contagion in faces is enhanced when progesterone levels are raised. Hormones and Behavior, 51, 202–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DeBruine, L. M. (2005). Trustworthy but not lust-worthy: Context-specific effects of facial resemblance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 272, 919–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., & Perrett, D. I. (2008). Social perception of facial resemblance in humans. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9266-0.
  7. DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., & Perrett, D. I. (2005). Women’s attractiveness judgments of self-resembling faces change across the menstrual cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 47, 379–383.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Law Smith, M. J., Moore, F. R., DeBruine, L. M., Cornwell, R. E., et al. (2006). Menstrual cycle, trait estrogen level and masculinity preferences in the human voice. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 215–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fessler, D. M. (2002). Reproductive immunosuppression and diet. Current Anthropology, 43, 19–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fink, B., & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2002). Evolutionary psychology of facial attractiveness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 154–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Flaxman, S. M., & Sherman, P. W. (2000). Morning sickness: A mechanism for protecting mother and embryo. Quarterly Review of Biology, 75, 113–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–644.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gangestad, S. W., Simpson, J. A., Cousins, A. J., Garver-Apgar, C. E., & Christensen, P. N. (2004). Women’s preferences for male behavioral displays change across the menstrual cycle. Psychological Science, 15, 203–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver, C. E. (2002). Changes in women’s sexual interests and their partners’ mate-retention tactics across the menstrual cycle: Evidence for shifting conflicts of interest. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 269, 975–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilbert, S. F. (2000). Developmental biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
  16. Grammer, K. (1993). 5-a-androst-16en-3a-on: A male pheromone? A brief report. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gray, P. B., Kahlenberg, S. M., Barrett, E. S., Lipson, S. F., & Ellison, P. T. (2002). Marriage and fatherhood are associated with lower testosterone in males. Evolution & Human Behavior, 23, 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haselton, M. G., & Gangestad, S. W. (2006). Conditional expression of women’s desires and men’s mate guarding across the ovulatory cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 509–518.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnston, V. S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B., & Grammer, K. (2001). Male facial attractiveness: Evidence for a hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L., DeBruine, L. M., Feinberg, D. R., Law Smith, M. J., et al. (2005b). Commitment to relationships and preferences for femininity and apparent health in faces are strongest on days of the menstrual cycle when progesterone level is high. Hormones and Behavior, 48, 283–290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones, B. C., Perrett, D. I., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L., Cornwell, R. E., Feinberg, D. R., et al. (2005a). Menstrual cycle, pregnancy and oral contraceptive use alter attraction to apparent health in faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 272, 347–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & Burriss, R. P. (2007). Preferences for masculinity in male bodies change across the menstrual cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 52, 633–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Manning, C. J., Wakeland, E. K., & Potts, W. K. (1992). Communal nesting patterns in mice implicate MHC genes in kin recognition. Nature, 360, 581–583.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mazur, A., & Booth, A. (1998). Testosterone and dominance in men. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 353–363.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller, G. F., & Todd, P. M. (1998). Mate choice turns cognitive. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 190–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Penn, D. J., & Potts, W. K. (1998). MHC-disassortative mating preferences reversed by cross-fostering. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 265, 1299–1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Penn, D. J., & Potts, W. K. (1999). The evolution of mating preferences and major histocompatability complex genes. The American Naturalist, 153, 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Penton-Voak, I. S., & Chen, J. Y. (2004). High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans. Evolution & Human Behavior, 25, 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Penton-Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2000). Female preference for male faces changes cyclically–further evidence. Evolution & Human Behavior, 21, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. L., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D. M., Murray, L. K., & Minamisawa, R. (1999). Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature, 399, 741–742.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I. S., Rowland, D. R., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., et al. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884–887.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Puts, D. A. (2005). Mating context and menstrual phase affect women’s preferences for male voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 388–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Puts, D. A. (2006). Cyclic variation in women’s preferences for masculine traits: Potential hormonal causes. Human Nature, 17, 114–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rhodes, G., Chan, J., Zebrowitz, L.A., & Simmons, L.W. (2003). Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270, S93–S95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Riley, A., & Riley, E. (2000). Controlled studies on women presenting with sexual drive disorder: I. Endocrine status. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 26, 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roney, J. R., Hanson, K. N., Durante, K. M., & Maestripieri, D. (2006). Reading men’s faces: Women’s mate attractiveness judgments track men’s testosterone and interest in infants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 273, 2169–2175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999). Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 452–460.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (2006). Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wedekind, C., Seebeck, T., Bettens, F., & Paepke, A. J. (1995). MHC-dependent mate preference in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 260, 245–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Welling, L. L. M., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Conway, C. A., Law Smith, M. J., Little, A. C., et al. (2007). Raised salivary testosterone in women is associated with increased attraction to masculine faces. Hormones and Behavior, 52, 156–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Westermarck, E. A. (1921). The history of human marriage (5th ed.). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benedict C. Jones
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lisa M. DeBruine
    • 1
  • David I. Perrett
    • 2
  • Anthony C. Little
    • 3
  • David R. Feinberg
    • 4
  • Miriam J. Law Smith
    • 2
  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenScotland, UK
  2. 2.School of PsychologyUniversity of St AndrewsSt AndrewsScotland, UK
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of StirlingStirlingScotland, UK
  4. 4.Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & BehaviourMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations