Skip to main content
Log in

Sexual Pleasure and Condom Use

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether sexually-experienced individuals’ pleasure ratings for protected and unprotected vaginal intercourse would be related to actual condom use. College participants (80 women and 35 men, M age = 22.29 years) who reported engaging in vaginal intercourse in the past 3 months completed a questionnaire that assessed their perceptions of the pleasurability of unprotected and condom-protected vaginal intercourse and their own sexual behaviors. Both women and men rated unprotected vaginal intercourse as more pleasurable than protected vaginal intercourse. However, men’s pleasure ratings for unprotected vaginal intercourse were higher than women’s. Furthermore, men and women’s pleasure ratings for condom-protected intercourse were correlated with their actual condom use behaviors. Men’s “pleasure decrement” scores indicated a significantly greater reduction in pleasure ratings between unprotected and protected intercourse than women’s scores. Men who perceived a larger decrease in pleasure between unprotected and protected intercourse were less likely to have used condoms in the past 3 months than those who perceived a smaller decrease in pleasure. The results provide evidence that many people believe that condoms reduce sexual pleasure and that men, in particular, who believe that condoms decrease pleasure are less likely to use them. Condom promotion campaigns should work to emphasize the pleasure-enhancing aspects of condom use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, P. R., & Pinkerton, S. D. (2002). With pleasure: Thoughts on the nature of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albarracín, D., Ho, R. M., McNatt, P. S., Williams, W. R., Rhodes, F., Malotte, C. K., et al. (2000). Structure of outcome beliefs in condom use. Health Psychology, 19, 458–468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Catania, J. A., Dolcini, M. M., Coates, T. J., Kegeles, S. M., Greenblatt, R. M., Puckett, S., et al. (1989). Predictors of condom use and multiple partnered sex among sexually-active adolescent women: Implications for AIDS-related health interventions. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 514–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, K. H., Rickman, R., & Catania, J. A. (1994). What heterosexual adults believe about condoms. New England Journal of Medicine, 331, 406–407.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, T. D., & Collins, B. E. (2005). Difference between condom users and condom nonusers in their multidimensional condom attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 603–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, R. A., Yarber, W. L., & Meyerson, B. (1999). Frequency and predictors of condom use and reasons for not using condoms among low-income women. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 24, 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helweg-Larsen, M., & Collins, B. E. (1994). The UCLA Multidimensional Condom Attitudes Scale: documenting the complex determinants of condom use. Health Psychology, 13, 224–237.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hingson, R. W., Strunin, L., Berlin, B. M., & Heeren, T. (1990). Beliefs about AIDS, use of alcohol and drugs, and unprotected sex among Massachusetts adolescents. American Journal of Public Health, 80, 295–299.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine. (1997). The hidden epidemic. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauth, M. R., St. Lawrence, J. S., & Kelly, J. A. (1991). Reliability of retrospective assessments of sexual HIV risk behavior: A comparison of biweekly, three-month, and twelve-month self-reports. AIDS Education and Prevention, 3, 207–214.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. A., & Kalichman, S. C. (1998). Reinforcement value of unsafe sex as a predictor of condom use and continued HIV/AIDS risk behavior among gay and bisexual men. Health Psychology, 17, 328–335.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, T. R., Bogart, L. M., Cecil, H., & Pinkerton, S. D. (2005). Primacy of affect over cognition in determining adult men’s condom use behavior: A review. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 2493–2534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkerton, S. D., & Abramson, P. R. (1995). The joys of diversification: Vaccines, condoms, and AIDS prevention. AIDS & Public Policy Journal, 10, 148–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkerton, S. D., Cecil, H., Bogart, L. M., & Abramson, P. R. (2003). The pleasures of sex: An empirical investigation. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 341–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pötsönen, R., & Kontula, O. (1999). How are attitudes towards condoms related to gender and sexual experiences among adolescents in Finland? Health Promotion International, 14, 211–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheer, V. C. (1995). Sensation seeking predispositions and susceptibility to a sexual partner’s appeals for condom use. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23, 212–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E. (1988). The relation of gender-role orientation to sexual experience among college students. Sex Roles, 19, 619–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was supported, in part, by grants T32-MH19985, P30-MH52776, and R01-MH72474 from the National Institute of Mental Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary E. Randolph.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Randolph, M.E., Pinkerton, S.D., Bogart, L.M. et al. Sexual Pleasure and Condom Use. Arch Sex Behav 36, 844–848 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9213-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9213-0

Keywords

Navigation