Skip to main content

Why Humans Have Sex

Archives of Sexual Behavior volume 36, pages 477–507 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

Historically, the reasons people have sex have been assumed to be few in number and simple in nature–to reproduce, to experience pleasure, or to relieve sexual tension. Several theoretical perspectives suggest that motives for engaging in sexual intercourse may be larger in number and psychologically complex in nature. Study 1 used a nomination procedure that identified 237 expressed reasons for having sex, ranging from the mundane (e.g., “I wanted to experience physical pleasure”) to the spiritual (e.g., “I wanted to get closer to God”), from altruistic (e.g., “I wanted the person to feel good about himself/herself”) to vengeful (e.g., “I wanted to get back at my partner for having cheated on me”). Study 2 asked participants (N = 1,549) to evaluate the degree to which each of the 237 reasons had led them to have sexual intercourse. Factor analyses yielded four large factors and 13 subfactors, producing a hierarchical taxonomy. The Physical reasons subfactors included Stress Reduction, Pleasure, Physical Desirability, and Experience Seeking. The Goal Attainment subfactors included Resources, Social Status, Revenge, and Utilitarian. The Emotional subfactors included Love and Commitment and Expression. The three Insecurity subfactors included Self-Esteem Boost, Duty/Pressure, and Mate Guarding. Significant gender differences supported several previously advanced theories. Individual differences in expressed reasons for having sex were coherently linked with personality traits and with individual differences in sexual strategies. Discussion focused on the complexity of sexual motivation and directions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Notes

  1. The 142-item YSEX? Questionnaire is available from the corresponding author.

  2. Available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  • Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1995). Human sperm competition. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basson, R. (2000). The female sexual response: A different model. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26, 51–65.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Sexual economics: Sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 339–363.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betzig, L. (1989). Causes of conjugal dissolution. Current Anthropology, 30, 654–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burley, N., & Symanski, R. (1981). Women without: An evolutionary and cross-cultural perspective on prostitution. In I. R. Symanski (Ed.), The immoral landscape: Female prostitution in Western societies (pp. 239–274). Toronto: Butterworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1989a). Conflict between the sexes: Strategic interference and the evocation of anger and upset. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 735–747.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1989b). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses testing in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2003). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating (rev. ed.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2005). The murderer next door: Why the mind is designed to kill. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: Mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 346–361.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. L., Volk, K. D., & Hyde, J. S. (1985). Differences between males and females in motives for engaging in sexual intercourse. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 131–139.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denney, N. W., Field, J. K., & Quadagno, D. (1984). Sex differences in sexual needs and desires. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 13, 233–245.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (1990). Toward an evolutionary history of female sociosexual variation. Journal of Personality, 58, 69–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 675–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiling, H., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Women’s sexual strategies: The hidden dimension of extra-pair mating. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 929–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, S., Herman, R. A., Nolan, C. L., & Wallen, K. (2004). Men and women differ in amygdala response to visual sexual stimuli. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 411–416.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (1996). Love and sex: Cross-cultural perspectives. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. A., & Preston, L. K. (1996). Individual differences in the experience of sexual motivation: Theory and measurement of dispositional sexual motives. Journal of Sex Research, 33, 27–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K., & Hurtado, A. M. (1996). Ache life history: The ecology and demography of a foraging people. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. (1991). The Big Five Inventory. Technical report, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Leary, M. R., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Interpersonal functions of the self-esteem motive: The self-system as a sociometer. In M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 123–144). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, B. C. (1989). Reasons for having and avoiding sex: Gender, sexual orientation, and relationship to sexual behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, B. (2005). Personality science and personal projects: Six impossible things before breakfast. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 4–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, B. S. (1989). Cross-cultural patterns in the training of children: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 103, 313–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meston, C. M., Heiman, J. R., Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Socially desirable responding and sexuality self-reports. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 148–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meston, C. M., Trapnell, P. D., & Gorzalka, B. B. (1993). Sex and the five factor model of personality. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the International Academy of Sex Research, Pacific Grove, CA.

  • Meston, C. M., Trapnell, P. D., & Gorzalka, B. B. (1998). Ethnic, gender, and length-of-residency influences on sexual knowledge and attitudes. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 176–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P. (2004). Patterns and universals of mate poaching across 53 nations: The effects of sex, culture, and personality on romantically attracting another person. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 560–584.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P., Alcalay, L., Alik, J., Ault, L., Austers, I., Bennett, K. L., et al. (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 85–104.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2001). Human mate poaching: Tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 894–917.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P., Shackelford, T. K., Duntley, J., Tooke, W., & Buss, D. M. (2001). The desire for sexual variety as a tool for understanding basic human mating strategies. Personal Relationships, 8, 425–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, T. K., Pound, N., Goetz, A. T., & LaMunyon, C. W. (2005). Female infidelity and sperm competition. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 372–393). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 60, 870–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, J. (1998). What women want–what men want: Why the sexes still see love and commitment so differently. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R.L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The man who mistook his wife for a chattel. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 289–322). New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, 108 E. Dean Keeton, Austin, TX, 78712, USA

    Cindy M. Meston & David M. Buss

Authors
  1. Cindy M. Meston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David M. Buss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cindy M. Meston.

Appendix

Appendix

figure a
figure b
figure c
figure d
figure e

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meston, C.M., Buss, D.M. Why Humans Have Sex. Arch Sex Behav 36, 477–507 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9175-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9175-2

Keywords

  • Sexual motivation
  • Sexual intercourse
  • Gender differences