Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 139–141 | Cite as

Latitude, Digit Ratios, and Allen’s and Bergmann’s Rules: A Comment on Loehlin, McFadden, Medland, and Martin (2006)

  • Peter L. HurdEmail author
  • Sari M. van Anders
Letter to the Editor
In a recent article in this Journal, Loehlin, McFadden, Medland, and Martin ( 2006) investigated the relationship between latitude and digit ratio (2D:4D) first commented upon by Manning ( 2002). Manning suggested that inter-ethnic differences in mean digit ratio were a function of latitude, with populations at intermediate latitudes having the highest digit ratios and those at the equator and at high latitudes having the lowest. This trend was seen in the populations studied in Manning et al. ( 2000) (see Fig. 1, left panel). Higher digit ratios appeared to be more common at intermediate latitudes. However, the data collected by Loehlin et al. do not appear to fit this trend (Fig. 1, right panel).


Testosterone Mental Rotation Digit Ratio Common Genetic Factor Rotation Ability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We thank Amy Chee, Steven Hamblin, Frank Trovato, and Reginia Yan for comments and assistance.


  1. Abbott, R. D., White, L. R., Ross, G. W., Petrovitch, H., Masaki, K. H., Snowdon, D. A. et al. (1998). Height as a marker of childhood development and late-life cognitive function: The Honolulu-Asia Aging Study. Pediatrics, 102, 602–609.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (1998). How Australians measure up: 1995 (ABS Cat #4359.0). Belconnen: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  3. Deady, D. K., & Law Smith, M. J. (2006). Height in women predicts maternal tendencies and career orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. European Communities. (2002). Health statistics: Key data on health 2002 (Cat #KS-08-02-002-EN-N). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  5. Eveleth, P. B., & Tanner, J. M. (1990). Worldwide variation in human growth (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Grech, V., Savona-Ventura, C., & Vassallo-Agius, P. (2002). Unexplained differences in sex ratios at birth in Europe and North America. British Medical Journal, 324, 1010–1011.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Humphreys, L. G., Davey, T. C., & Park, R. K. (1985). Longitudinal correlation analysis of standing height and intelligence. Child Development, 56, 1465–1478.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. James, W. H. (2004). Further evidence that mammalian sex ratios at birth are partially controlled by parental hormone levels around the time of conception. Human Reproduction, 19, 1250–1256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Katzmarzyk, P. T., & Leonard, W. R. (1995). Body mass, surface area and climate. American Journal of Human Biology, 7, 128.Google Scholar
  10. Kere, J. (2001). Human population genetics: Lessons from Finland. Annual Review of Genomics: Human Genetics, 1, 103–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Loehlin, J. C., McFadden, D., Medland, S. E., & Martin, N. G. (2006). Population differences in finger-length ratios: Ethnicity or latitude? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 739–742.Google Scholar
  12. Manning, J. T. (2002). Digit ratio: A pointer to fertility, behavior, and health. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Manning, J. T., Barley, L., Walton, J., Lewis-Jones, D., Trivers, R. L., Singh, D. et al. (2000). The 2nd:4th digit ratio, sexual dimorphism, population differences, and reproductive success: Evidence for sexually antagonistic genes. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 163–183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Roberts, D. F. (1978). Climate and human variability (2nd ed.). Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin-Cummings.Google Scholar
  15. Ruff, C. B. (1994). Morphological adaptation to climate in modern and fossil hominids. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 37, 65–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ruff, C. (2002). Variation in human body size and shape. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Silventoinen, K., Posthuma, D., van Beijsterveldt, T., Bartels, M., & Boomsma, D. I. (2006). Genetic contributions to the association between height and intelligence: Evidence from Dutch twin data from childhood to middle age. Genes, Brain, and Behavior, 5, 585–595.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tan, U., Okyan, M., Albayrak, T., & Akgun, A. (2003). Sex differences in verbal and spatial ability reconsidered in relation to body size, lung volume, and sex hormones. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96, 1347–1360.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Teasdale, T. W., Srensen, T. I. A., & Owen, D. R. (1989). Fall in association of height with intelligence and educational level. British Medical Journal, 298, 1292–1293.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tuvemo, T., Jonsson, B., & Persson, I. (1999). Intellectual and physical performance and morbidity in relation to height in a cohort of 18-year-old Swedish conscripts. Hormone Research, 52, 186--191.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychologySimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations