Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 36, Issue 6, pp 793–807 | Cite as

Ambivalent Affect and Sexual Response: The Impact of Co-Occurring Positive and Negative Emotions on Subjective and Physiological Sexual Responses to Erotic Stimuli

Original Paper

Abstract

This study aimed to clarify the role of positive, negative, and ambivalent (i.e., co-occurring positive and negative) affect in predicting subjective sexual arousal, sexual desire, and genital response. A total of 26 women and 19 men observed three erotic film excerpts and a film excerpt depicting a coercive sexual encounter. Genital responses were recorded throughout the study, and participants rated their mood and subjective sexual arousal and desire following each excerpt. Results showed that positive affect was strongly and positively related to subjective sexual response. Although negative affect was generally a poor predictor of subjective sexual arousal, for women, it was positively associated with genital response in some conditions. Ambivalent affect was consistently associated with relatively high levels of subjective sexual arousal and desire. Results point to the importance of recognizing the role of ambivalent or mixed emotional states when evaluating the relationship between affect and sexual response.

Keywords

Sexual arousal Sexual desire Affect Ambivalence Vaginal photoplethysmography Penile erection Psychophysiology 

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Bancroft, J., Janssen, E., Strong, D., Carnes, L., Vukadinovic, Z., & Long, J. S. (2003a). The relation between mood and sexuality in heterosexual men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 217–230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bancroft, J., Janssen, E., Strong, D., Carnes, L., Vukadinovic, Z., & Long. J. S. (2003b). Sexual risk taking in gay men: The relevance of sexual arousability, mood, and sensation seeking. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 555–572.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barlow, D. H. (1986). Causes of sexual dysfunction: The role of anxiety and cognitive interference. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 140–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basson, R. (2003). Biopsychosocial models of women's sexual response: Applications to management of desire disorders. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 18, 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, A. T. (1967). Depression: Clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects. London: Staples Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1999). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 839–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carpenter, D., Janssen, E., Graham, C., Vorst, H, & Wicherts, J. (2005). Women's scores on the Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Scales (SISSES): Gender similarities and differences. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  9. Cranston-Cuebas, M. A., & Barlow, D. H. (1990). Cognitive and affective contributions to sexual functioning. Annual Review of Sex Research, 1, 119–161.Google Scholar
  10. Diener, E., & Iran-Nejad, A. (1986). The relationship in experience between various types of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1031–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Everaerd, W., & Both, S. (2001). Ideal female sexual function. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 27, 137–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Graham, C. A., Sander, S. A., Milhausen, R. R., & McBride, K. R. (2004). Turning on and turning off: A focus group study of the factors that affect women's sexual arousal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 527–538.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  14. Heiman, J. R. (1980). Female sexual response patterns: Interactions of physiological, affective, and contextual cues. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 1311–1316.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Izard, C. E. (1972). Patterns of emotion. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Janssen, E., Carpenter, D., & Graham, C. A. (2003). Selecting films for sex research: Gender differences in erotic film preference. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 243–251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Janssen, E., Everaerd, W., Spiering, M., & Janssen, J. (2000). Automatic processes and the appraisal of sexual stimuli: Toward an information processing model of sexual arousal. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 8–23.Google Scholar
  18. Janssen, E., Prause, N., & Geer, J. H. (in press). The sexual response. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (3rd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Janssen, E., Vorst, H., Finn, P., & Bancroft, J. (2002). The Sexual Inhibition (SIS) and Sexual Excitation (SES) Scales: I. Measuring sexual inhibition and excitation proneness in men. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 114–126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Judd, C. M., & McClelland, G. H. (1989). Data analysis: A model comparison approach. San Diego, CA: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  21. Kaplan, H. S. (1981). The new sex therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  22. Koukounas, E., & McCabe, M. P. (2001). Sexual and emotional variables influencing sexual responses to erotica: A psychophysiological investigation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 393–408.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laan, E., & Everaerd, W. (1995). Determinants of female sexual arousal: Psychophysiological theory and data. Annual Review of Sex Research, 6, 32–76.Google Scholar
  24. Laan, E., Everaerd, W., & Evers, A. (1995). Assessment of female sexual arousal: Response specificity and construct validity. Psychophysiology, 32, 476–485.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Laan, E., Everaerd, W., van Aanhold, M., & Rebel, M. (1993). Performance demand and sexual arousal in women. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31, 25–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laan, E., Everaerd, W., van Bellen, G., & Hanewald, G. (1994). Women's sexual and emotional responses to male- and female-produced erotic. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 153–170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Laan, E., Everaerd, W., van Berlo, R., & Rijs, L. (1995). Mood and sexual arousal in women. Behaviour Research, and Therapy, 33, 441–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Laan, E., & Janssen, E. (in press). How do men and women feel? Determinants of subjective experience of sexual arousal. In E. Janssen (Ed.), The psychophysiology of sex. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Larsen, J. T., McGraw, A. P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Can people feel happy and sad at the same time? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 684–696.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leonard, L. M., & Follette, V. M. (2002). Sexual functioning in women reporting a history of child sexual abuse: Review of the empirical literature and clinical implications. Annual Review of Sex Research, 13, 346–388.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lykins, A. D., Janssen, E., & Graham, C. A. (2006). The relationship between negative mood and sexuality in heterosexual college women and men. Journal of Sex Research, 2, 136–143.Google Scholar
  33. Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. E. (1970). Human sexual inadequacy. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  34. Mitchell, W. B., DiBartolo, P. M., Brown, T. A., & Barlow, D. H. (1998). Effects of positive and negative mood on sexual arousal in sexually functional males. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27, 197–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mosher, D. L., & MacIan, P. (1994). College men and women respond to X-rated videos intended for male and female audiences: Gender and sexual scripts. Journal of Sex Research, 31, 99–113.Google Scholar
  36. Nobre, P. J., Wiegel, M., Bach, A. K., Weisberg, R. B., Brown, T. A., Wincze, J. P., et al. (2004). Determinants of sexual arousal and the accuracy of its self-estimation in sexually functional males. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 363–371.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. O’Sullivan, L. F., & Gaines, M. E. (1998). Decision-making in college students’ heterosexual dating relationships: Ambivalence about engaging in sexual activity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (in press). Conceptualizing the “wantedness” of women's consensual and nonconsensual sexual experiences: Implications for how women label their experiences with rape. Journal of Sex Research. Google Scholar
  39. Reich, J. W., Zautra, A. J., & Davis, M. (2003). Dimensions of affect relationships: Models and their integrative implications. Review of General Psychology, 7, 66–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rosen, R., Brown, C., Heiman, J., Leiblum, S., Meston, C., Shabsigh, R., et al. (2000). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 26, 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rowland, D. L., Cooper, S. E., & Slob, A. K. (1996). Genital and psychoaffective response to erotic stimulation in sexually functional and dysfunctional men. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 194–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rowland, D. L., Tai, W. L., & Slob, A. K. (2003). An exploration of emotional responses to erotic stimulation in men with premature ejaculation: Effects of treatment with clomipramine. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 145–153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (1999). On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 3–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schimmack, U. (2005). Response latencies of pleasure and displeasure ratings: Further evidence for mixed feelings. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 671–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schimmack, U., Böckenholt, U., & Reisenzein, R. (2002). Response styles in affect ratings: Making a mountain out of a molehill. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 461–483.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Scollon, C. N., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2005). An experience sampling and cross-cultural investigation of the relationship between pleasant and unpleasant affect. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sintchak, G., & Geer, J. H. (1975). A vaginal photoplethysmograph system. Psychophysiology, 12, 113–115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tiefer, L. (1991). Historical, scientific, clinical, and feminist criticisms of the human sexual response cycle. Annual Review of Sex Research, 2, 1–23.Google Scholar
  50. Tolman, D. L., & Diamond, L. M. (2001). Desegregating sexuality research: Cultural and biological perspectives on gender and desire. Annual Review of Sex Research, 12, 33–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219–235.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Watson, D., Wiese, D., Vaidya, J., & Tellegen, A. (1999). The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 820–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and ReproductionIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychological and Brain SciencesIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations