Skip to main content
Log in

Sex Differences in Memory for Sexually-Relevant Information

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study was conducted in an attempt to examine potential differences between men and women in memory for sexually relevant information. A total of 77 undergraduate students (31 men, 46 women) read a sexual story and completed memory tasks in response to the story. Based on previous research, we hypothesized that differences would exist between men and women for different types of sexual information and we hoped to understand whether specific variables (sexual experiences, sexual functioning, and reactions to the sexual story) could explain such differences. Men were more likely to remember erotic or explicit details of the story, whereas women were more likely to remember love and emotional bonding details of the story. Additionally, women were more likely to recall information referencing the characters in the story. Results from regression analyses indicated that sexual desire and satisfaction were related to differences in recall and recognition of the love and emotional bonding aspects of the story, and that frequency of sexual intercourse was related to differences in the recall of erotic or explicit details of the story. The significant results obtained in this study correspond to previously established sex differences in memory for sexual information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. A., Silverstein, J. W., Ritz, S. A., & Jones, R. S. (1977). Distinctive features, categorical perception, and probability learning: Some applications of a neural model. Psychological Review, 84, 413–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R., & Bower G. H. (1973). Human associative memory. Oxford, England: V. H. Winston & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, D. H. (1986). Causes of sexual dysfunction: The role of anxiety and cognitive interference. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 140–148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Basson, R. (2002). A model of women’s sexual arousal. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 28, 1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, M. M., Greenwald, M. K., Petry, M. C., & Lang, P. J. (1992). Remembering pictures: Pleasure and arousal in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 379–390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, S., & Geer, J. H. (2001). Implicit and explicit memory of neutral, negative emotional, and sexual information. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 615–631.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Canli, T., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2004). Imaging gender differences in sexual arousal. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 325–326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. R., & Melisaratos, N. (1979). The DSFI: A multidimensional measure of sexual functioning. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 5, 244–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (1973). The self-concept revisited: Or a theory of a theory. American Psychologist, 28, 404–416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geer, J. H. (1996). Gender differences in the organization of sexual information. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 25, 91–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geer, J. H., Judice, S., & Jackson, S. (2001). Reading times for erotic material: The pause to reflect. Journal of General Psychology, 121, 345–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geer, J. H., & McGlone, M. S. (1990). Sex differences in memory for erotica. Cognition and Emotion, 4, 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, S., Herman, R. A., Nolan, C. L., & Wallen, K. (2004). Men and women differ in amygdala response to visual sexual stimuli. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 411–416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heiman, J. R., & Rowland, D. L. (1983). Affective and physiological sexual response patterns: The effects of instructions on sexually functional and dysfunctional men. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 27, 105–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, H. L. (1913). Characteristic differences between recall and recognition. American Journal of Psychology, 24, 532–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, D. C. (1997). Statistical methods for psychology. Boston: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology (Vol. I, pp. 643–689). New York: Henry Holt and Co.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S. S. (2004). Gender and self-determination in sexual motivation. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 64, 6330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch-Rosenkrantz, J., & Geer, J. H. (1991). Gender differences in memory for a sexual story. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 20, 295–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. J., Gibbons, F. X., & Gerrard, M. (1986). Sexual experience and recall of sexual vs. nonsexual information. Journal of Personality, 54, 676–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libkumen, T. M., Stabler, C. L., & Otani, J. (2004). Arousal, valence, and memory for detail. Memory, 12, 237–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDougall, R. (1904). Recognition and recall. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods, 1, 229–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 551–558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, K. M., & Meston, C. M. (2004, October). Cues resulting in desire for sexual activity in women. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the International Society for the Study of Women’s Sexual Health (ISSWSH), Atlanta, Georgia.

  • Nielson, K. A., Radtke, R. C., & Jensen, R. A. (1996). Arousal-induced modulation of memory storage processes in humans. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 66, 133–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 29–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peplau, L. A. (2003). Human sexuality: How do men and women differ? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 37–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postman, L. (1963). One trial learning. In C. F. Cofer & B. S. Musgrave (Eds.), Verbal behavior and learning (pp. 295–332). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Psychological Corporation. (1997). The Weschler Memory Scale (WMS-III) (3rd edn.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R., Brown, C., Heiman, J., Leiblum, S., Meston, C., Shabsigh, R., et al. (2000). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 26, 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. C., Riley, A., Wagner, G., Osterloh, I. H., Kirkpatrick, J., & Mishra, A. (1997). The international index of erectile function (IIEF): A multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology, 49, 822–830.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, G., Sigusch, V., & Schafer, S. (1973). Responses to reading erotic stories: Male-female differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2, 181–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schvaneveldt, R. W. (Ed.). (1990). Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., & Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium (pp. 89–134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, L., & Nicoladis, E. (2004). Losing it: Similarities and differences in the first intercourse experiences of men and women. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 13, 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegel, M., Meston, C., & Rosen, R. (2005). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): Cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 31, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, J. (1976). The social psychology of sex. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This publication was made possible by Grant Number 5 RO1 AT00224-02 from the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine to Cindy M. Meston. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cindy M. Meston.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCall, K.M., Rellini, A.H., Seal, B.N. et al. Sex Differences in Memory for Sexually-Relevant Information. Arch Sex Behav 36, 508–517 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9106-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9106-7

Keywords

Navigation