This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1993). Human sperm competition: Ejaculate manipulation by females and a function for the female orgasm. Animal Behaviour, 46, 887–909.
Barash, D. (2005). Let a thousand orgasms bloom! [Review of the book The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution]. Evolutionary Psychology, 3, 347–354.
Fox, C. A., Wolff, H. S., & Baker, J. A. (1970). Measurement of intra-vaginal and intra-uterine pressures during human coitus by radio-telemetry. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 22, 243–251.
Judson, O. (2005). Anticlimax [Review of the book The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution]. Nature, 436, 916–917.
Levin, R. J. (2002). The physiology of sexual arousal in the human female: A recreational and procreational synthesis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 405–411.
Lloyd, E. A. (2005). The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Puts, D. A. (2006). [Review of the book The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 103–108.
Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wallen, K. Commentary on Puts’ (2006) Review ofThe Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution . Arch Sex Behav 35, 633–636 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9100-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9100-0