Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 281–288 | Cite as

Women’s Views of their Sexual Difficulties: Agreement and Disagreement with Clinical Diagnoses

  • Michael KingEmail author
  • Victoria Holt
  • Irwin Nazareth
Original Paper

Abstract

There is controversy about how to conceptualize sexual problems in women. Our purpose in this study was to compare ICD-10 diagnoses of sexual dysfunction in women with whether or not the woman perceived she had a sexual problem, her views on its origins, and its impact on her life. Participants (N = 401, M age, 37.8 years) were consecutive attendees to general practices in London, England. Our main measures were an ICD-10 diagnosis of sexual dysfunction and the woman’s own perception of a sexual problem. Based on reported symptoms and behavior, 38% of women had at least one ICD-10 diagnosis of sexual dysfunction. Prevalence fell to 18% in women who also perceived they had a problem and to 6% in women who regarded the problem as moderate or severe. A total of 73 (18%) women were assigned an ICD-10 diagnosis and agreed that they had a problem, 80 (20%) were assigned a diagnosis but reported no problem, 78 (19%) had no diagnosis but reported a sexual problem, and 170 (42%) had no diagnosis and reported no problem. For women with sexual partners, reported sexual satisfaction was lowest in those assigned an ICD-10 diagnosis who also perceived they had a problem and highest in those with no diagnosis and no perceived problem. Relationship and emotional difficulties were the most common perceived causes of sexual difficulties, whether or not an ICD-10 diagnosis was assigned. There were three aspects to sexual difficulties in women. The first concerned symptoms and behavior that clinicians used to make a diagnosis, the second was the woman’s own perception that she had a sexual difficulty, and the third was her level of sexual satisfaction. All three appear to be important and may explain why published prevalence rates of sexual dysfunction and associated factors are so conflicting.

Keywords

Sexual dysfunction Diagnosis Women Attitudes DSM-IV ICD-10 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank all the women and general practice staff who participated or assisted with the research. We also wish to thank Cynthia Graham for her comments on a draft of the manuscript. Victoria Holt was funded by the Priory Hospital Group. Michael King and Irwin Nazareth conceived the idea for the study and obtained funding. Victoria Holt collected and managed the data. Michael King and Irwin Nazareth analyzed the data. All authors contributed to the writing of the paper.

References

  1. Akkus, E., Kadioglu, A., Esen, A., Doran, S., Ergen, A., Anafarta, K., et al. (2002). Prevalence and correlates of erectile dysfunction in Turkey: A population-based study. European Urology, 41, 298–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (Fourth ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bancroft, J. (2002). The medicalization of female sexual dysfunction: The need for caution. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 451–455.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bancroft, J., Loftus, J., & Long, J. S. (2003). Distress about sex: A national survey of women in heterosexual relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 193–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basson, R. (2001). Female sexual response: The role of drugs in the management of sexual dysfunction. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 98, 350–353.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basson, R., Berman, J., Burnett, A., Derogatis, L., Ferguson, D., Fourcroy, J., et al. (2000). Report of the International Consensus Development Conference on Female Sexual Dysfunction: Definitions and classifications. Journal of Urology, 163, 888–893.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basson, R., Berman, J., Burnett, A., Derogatis, L., Ferguson, D., Fourcroy, J., et al. (2001). Report of the International Consensus Development Conference on Female Sexual Dysfunction: Definitions and classifications. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 27, 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunn, K. M., Croft, P. R., & Hackett, G. I. (1998). Sexual problems: A study of the prevalence and need for health care in the general population. Family Practice, 15, 519–524.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fugl-Meyer, A. R., & Fugl-Meyer, K. (1999). Sexual disabilities, problems and satisfaction in 18–74 year old Swedes. Scandinavian Journal of Sexology, 2, 79–105.Google Scholar
  10. Graham, C. A., Sanders, S. A., Milhausen, R. R., & McBride, K. R. (2004). Turning on and turning off: A focus group study of the factors that affect women’s sexual arousal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 527–538.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Humphrey, S., & Nazareth, I. (2001). GPs’ views on their management of sexual dysfunction. Family Practice, 18, 516–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
  13. Laumann, E. O., Paik, A., & Rosen, R. C. (1999). Sexual dysfunction in the United States: Prevalence and predictors. Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 537–544.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. (1970). Human sexual inadequacy. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  15. Mercer, C. H., Fenton, K. A., Johnson, A. M., Copas, A. J., MacDowall, W., Erens, B., et al. (2005). Who reports sexual function problems? Empirical evidence from Britain’s 2000 National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 81, 394–399.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Michael, R. T., Gagnon, J. H., Laumann, E. O., & Kolata, G. (1995). Sex in America: A definitive survey. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  17. Mirone, V., Imbimbo, C., Bortolotti, A., Di Cintio, E., Colli, E., Landoni, M., et al. (2002). Cigarette smoking as risk factor for erectile dysfunction: Results from an Italian epidemiological study. European Urology, 41, 294–297.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moynihan, R. (2003). The making of a disease: Female sexual dysfunction. British Medical Journal, 326, 45–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moynihan, R. (2005). The marketing of a disease: Female sexual dysfunction. British Medical Journal, 330, 192–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nazareth, I., Boynton, P., & King, M. (2003). Problems with sexual function in people attending London general practitioners: Cross sectional study. British Medical Journal, 327, 423–426.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nicolson, P., & Burr, J. (2003). What is “normal” about women’s (hetero)sexual desire and orgasm?: A report of an in-depth interview study. Social Science and Medicine, 57, 1735–1745.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Osborn, M., Hawton, K., & Gath, D. (1988). Sexual dysfunction among middle aged women in the community. British Medical Journal, 296, 959–962.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Taylor, J. F., Rosen, R. C., & Leiblum, S. R. (1994). Self-report assessment of female sexual function: Psychometric evaluation of the Brief Index of Sexual Functioning for Women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 627–643.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tiefer, L. (2000). Sexology and the pharmaceutical industry: The threat of co-optation. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tiefer, L. (2001). A new view of women’s sexual problems: Why new? Why now? Journal of Sex Research, 38, 89–96.Google Scholar
  26. Vroege, J. A., Gijs, L., & Hengeveld, M. W. (1998). Classification of sexual dysfunctions: Towards DSM-V and ICD-11. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 39, 333–337.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. World Health Organization. (1992). International statistical classification of disease and related health problems (10th rev.). Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mental Health SciencesRoyal Free & University College Medical School, Hampstead CampusLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Primary Care and Population SciencesRoyal Free & University College Medical School, Hampstead CampusLondonUK

Personalised recommendations