Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 469–470 | Cite as

Pentaethylene-Terephthalate (PET) Bottles: A New Device for Autoerotic Strangulation of the Penis Causing Serious Injury

  • Thomas A. VoegeliEmail author
  • Peter J. Effert
Clinical Case Report Series


Strangulation of the penis by application of constricting devices may present a challenge for the treating physician. Depending on the type of constricting material, special equipment is essential for successful removal of the foreign bodies. We report a new form of constricting device, the neck of a Coca Cola bottle made of Pentaethylene-terephthalate (PET). Particular difficulties were encountered upon removal. Technical details of this case are described. Prior literature on the treatment of penile strangulation is discussed.

Key Words

penis strangulation constriction autoeroticism 


  1. Greenspan, L. (1982). Tourniquet syndrome caused by metallic bands: A new tool for removal. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 11, 375–378.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Huang, J. K., Holt, D., & Philp, T. (1997). Penile constriction by foreign bodies: The use of a dental drill. British Journal of Urology, 79, 801.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kore, R. N., & Blacklock, A. R. (1996). Ring the fire brigade. British Journal of Urology, 78, 948.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. McGain, F., & Freedman, D. (1999). Penile entrapment in a bottle: The case for using a diamond-tipped portable glass saw. BJU International, 83, 1071–1072.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. McLaughlin, T., & Coyner, W. (1989). Removal of a strangulating metal bearing from the penis. Journal of Urology, 141, 617.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Perabo, F. G., Steiner, G., Albers, P., & Müller, S. C. (2002). Treatment of penile strangulation caused by constricting devices. Urology, 59, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Schneider, T., Sperling, H., Lümmen, G., Syllwasschy, J., & Rübben, H. (2001). Does penile size in younger men cause problems in condom use? A prospective measurement of penile dimensions in 111 young and 32 older men. Urology, 57, 314–318.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Snoy, F. J., Wagner, S. A., Woodside, J. R., Orgel, M. G., & Borden, T. A. (1984). Management of penile incarceration. Urology, 24, 18–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Vahasarja, V., Hellstrom, P. A., Serlo, W., & Konturri, M. Y. (1993). Treatment of penile incarceration by the string method. Journal of Urology, 108, 1185–1186.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of UrologyUniversity of DuesseldorfDuesseldorfGermany

Personalised recommendations