The Ethical Knob: ethically-customisable automated vehicles and the law
Accidents involving autonomous vehicles (AVs) raise difficult ethical dilemmas and legal issues. It has been argued that self-driving cars should be programmed to kill, that is, they should be equipped with pre-programmed approaches to the choice of what lives to sacrifice when losses are inevitable. Here we shall explore a different approach, namely, giving the user/passenger the task (and burden) of deciding what ethical approach should be taken by AVs in unavoidable accident scenarios. We thus assume that AVs are equipped with what we call an “Ethical Knob”, a device enabling passengers to ethically customise their AVs, namely, to choose between different settings corresponding to different moral approaches or principles. Accordingly, AVs would be entrusted with implementing users’ ethical choices, while manufacturers/programmers would be tasked with enabling the user’s choice and ensuring implementation by the AV.
KeywordsAutonomous vehicle Liability and automation Ethical dilemmas
The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their many valuable comments and suggestions.
- Bonnefon JF, Shariff A, Rahwan I (2015) Autonomous vehicles need experimental ethics: are we ready for utilitarian cars? arXiv preprint arXiv:151003346
- Foot P (1967) The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect. Oxford Review 5(1):5–15Google Scholar
- Gogoll J, Müller JF (2016) Autonomous cars: In favor of a mandatory ethics setting. Science and Engineering Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9806-x
- Lin P (2014) Here’s a terrible idea: robot cars with adjustable ethics settings. Wired com Available via http://www.wired.com/2014/08/heres-a-terrible-idea-robot-cars-with-adjustable-ethics-settings
- Lin P (2016) Why ethics matters for autonomous cars. In: Maurer M, Gerdes JC, Lenz B, Winner H (eds) Autonomous driving. Springer, pp 69–85Google Scholar
- Nyholm S, Smids J (2016) The ethics of accident-algorithms for self-driving cars: an applied trolley problem? Ethical theory and moral practice pp 1–15, doi: 10.1007/s10677-016-9745-2
- Rawls J (1999) A Theory of Justice, revised edn. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar