Advertisement

Artificial Intelligence and Law

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 217–240 | Cite as

A fourth law of robotics? Copyright and the law and ethics of machine co-production

  • Burkhard Schafer
  • David Komuves
  • Jesus Manuel Niebla Zatarain
  • Laurence Diver
Article

Abstract

Jon Bing was not only a pioneer in the field of artificial intelligence and law and the legal regulation of technology. He was also an accomplished author of fiction, with an oeuvre spanning from short stories and novels to theatre plays and even an opera. As reality catches up with the imagination of science fiction writers who have anticipated a world shared by humans and non-human intelligences of their creation, some of the copyright issues he has discussed in his academic capacity take on new resonance. How will we regulate copyright when robots are producers and consumers of art? This paper tries to give a sketch of the problem and hints at possible answers that are to a degree inspired by Bing’s academic and creative writing.

Keywords

Robotics Copyright law Bing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Work on this paper was supported by the RCUK funded CREATE network, http://www.create.ac.uk.

References

  1. Abie H, Foyn B, Bing J, Blobel B, Pharow P, Delgado J, Tzovaras D (2004) The need for a digital rights management framework for the next generation of e-government services. Electron Gov Int J 1(1):8–28Google Scholar
  2. Asada M et al (2001) Cognitive developmental robotics as a new paradigm for the design of humanoid robots. Robot Auton Syst 37(2):185–193zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bing J (1981) A meeting in Georgestown. In: Aldiss B, Lundwall S (eds) The penguin world omnibus of science fiction. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Bing J (1984) Handbook of legal information retrieval. Elsevier Science Inc., AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  5. Bing J (1991) Legal text retrieval systems the unsatisfactory state of the art. JL & Inf Sci 2:1Google Scholar
  6. Bing J (1996) The contribution of technology to the identification of rights, especially in sound and audio–visual works: an overview. Int J Law Inf Technol 4(3):234–254MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bing J (1997) Availability and copyright. IFLA J 23:4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bing J (1998) A futuristic exploration of virtual reality. In: Jeleff S (ed) A virtual new world?. Council of Europe, StrassburgGoogle Scholar
  9. Bing J (2003) Deposit, copyright and the notion of a ‘document’. Alexandria 15(3):171–174Google Scholar
  10. Bing J (2004) Copymarks: a suggestion for simple management of copyrighted material. Int Rev Law Comput Technol 18(3):347–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bing J (2007) Interview with Erling Rognli. Pegasus 3:24–35Google Scholar
  12. Bing J (2008) The Riddle of the robots. J Int Commer Law Technol 3:197–206Google Scholar
  13. Bing J (2009) Copyright protection of computer programs. In: Derclaye E (ed) Research handbook on the future of EU copyright. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 401–426Google Scholar
  14. Bing J (2013) Celebrating Gnaeus Flavius and open access to law. J Open Access Law 1:1MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Bing J, Sartor G (eds) (2003) The law of electronic agents. Unipubskriftserier, OsloGoogle Scholar
  16. Boden MA (1994) Précis of the creative mind: myths and mechanisms. Behav Brain Sci 17(03):519–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Boden MA (1998) Creativity and artificial intelligence. Artif Intell 103(1):347–356zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Boden MA (2009) Computer models of creativity. AI Mag 30(3):23Google Scholar
  19. Borel E (1913) Mécanique Statistique et Irréversibilité. J Phys 5e série 3:189–196Google Scholar
  20. Borges JL (2007) The total library. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Bridy A (2012) Coding creativity: copyright and the artificially intelligent author. Stanf Technol Law Rev 5:1–28Google Scholar
  22. Butler TL (1981) Can a computer be an author-copyright aspects of artificial intelligence. Comm/Ent LS 4:707Google Scholar
  23. Cangelosi A et al (2010) Integration of action and language knowledge: a roadmap for developmental robotics. IEEE Trans Auton Ment Dev 2(3):167–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chon M (2007) Intellectual property from below: copyright and capability for education. UC Davis Law Rev 40:803Google Scholar
  25. Collingwood RG (1958) The principles of art, vol 11. Oxford University Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  26. Contissa G, Laukyte M (2008) Legal knowledge representation: a twofold experience in the domain of intellectual property law. In: Francesconi E et al (eds) Proceedings of the 2008 conference on legal knowledge and information systems. JURIX 2008 IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 98–107Google Scholar
  27. Cox I, Linnartz J (1998) Some general methods for tampering with water-marks. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 16(4):587–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dante M, Tamburrini G (2006) Learning robots and human responsibility. Int Rev Inf Ethics 6:46–51Google Scholar
  29. Di Dio C et al (2007) The golden beauty: brain response to classical and renaissance sculptures. PLoS One 2(11):e1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Favale M (2011) Approximation and DRM: can digital locks respect copyright exceptions? Int J Law Inf Technol 19(4):306–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Funkhouser C (2007) Prehistoric digital poetry: an archaeology of forms 1959–1995. University of Alabama Press, TuscaloosaGoogle Scholar
  32. Gervás P (2000) Wasp: evaluation of different strategies for the automatic generation of Spanish verse. In: Proceedings of the AISB-00 symposium on creative & cultural aspects of AI, pp 93–100Google Scholar
  33. Gervás P (2001) An expert system for the composition of formal Spanish poetry. Knowl-Based Syst 14(3):181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gordon TF (2011) Analyzing open source license compatibility issues with Carneades. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on artificial intelligence and law ACM, pp 51–55Google Scholar
  35. Hartman CO (1996) Virtual muse: experiments in computer poetry. Wesleyan University Press, MiddletownGoogle Scholar
  36. Haupenthal G (1994) Geschichte der Würfelmusik in Beispielen, vol. 2. Saarbrücken, Univ., DissGoogle Scholar
  37. Hong J, Rouget T (2014) Lesende und glaeubige Roboter im Film. In: Libert W-A et al (eds) Künstliche Menschen. Koenigshausen & Neumann, WürzburgGoogle Scholar
  38. Horikawa T et al (2013) Neural decoding of visual imagery during sleep. Science 340(6132):639–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jiang L, Zhou M (2008) Generating Chinese couplets using a statistical MT approach. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on computational linguistics, vol. 1, pp 377–384. Association for Computational LinguisticsGoogle Scholar
  40. Jordanous A (2012) A standardised procedure for evaluating creative systems: computational creativity evaluation based on what it is to be creative. Cogn Comput 4(3):246–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kac E (1997) Foundation and development of robotic art. Art J 56(3):60–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kamitani Y, Tong F (2005) Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain. Nat Neurosci 8:679–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Komuves D et al (2015) Monkeying around with copyright: animals, AIS and authorship in law. Jusletter-IT 26:RZ1–RZ27Google Scholar
  44. Kostelanetz R (1971) Machine art. Centen Rev 15:229–249Google Scholar
  45. Lee E (2012) Digital originality. Vanderbilt J Entertain Technol Law 14(4):919Google Scholar
  46. Lee JH et al (2009) Brain–machine interface via real-time fMRI: preliminary study on thought-controlled robotic arm. Neurosci Lett 450(1):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Legaspi R et al (2007) Music compositional intelligence with an affective flavor. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces ACM, pp 216–224Google Scholar
  48. Lessig L (1999) Code and other laws of cyberspace. Basic books, NYGoogle Scholar
  49. Mahler T, Bing J (2006) Contractual risk management in an ICT context-searching for a possible interface between legal methods and risk analysis. Scand Stud Law 49:339–357Google Scholar
  50. Manurung R, Ritchie G, Thompson H (2012) Using genetic algorithms to create meaningful poetic text. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 24(1):43–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Matthias A (2004) The responsibility gap: ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata. Ethics Inf Technol 6(3):175–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McCormack J, d’Inverno M (2012) Computers and creativity. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McCutcheon J (2012) Vanishing author in computer-generated works: a critical analysis of recent Australian case law, The. Melb Univ Law Rev 36:915Google Scholar
  54. Moffat DC, Kelly M (2006) An investigation into people’s bias against computational creativity in music composition. Assessment 13:11–17Google Scholar
  55. Mulligan DK, Han J, Burstein AJ (2003) How DRM-based content delivery systems disrupt expectations of personal use. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM workshop on digital rights management, pp 77–89Google Scholar
  56. Nadal M et al (2008) Towards a framework for the study of the neural correlates of aesthetic preference. Spat Vis 21(3):379–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nierhaus G (2009) Algorithmic composition: paradigms of automated music generation. Springer, WienCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Oberle D, Drefs F, Wacker R, Baumann C, Raabe O (2012) Engineering compliant software: advising developers by automating legal reasoning. SCRIPTed 9(2):280–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Oliveira HG (2012) PoeTryMe: a versatile platform for poetry generation. In: Proceedings of the ECAI 2012 workshop on computational creativity, concept invention, and general intelligenceGoogle Scholar
  60. Petrie HG (2011) The dilemma of enquiry and learning. Living Control Systems Publ, HaywardGoogle Scholar
  61. Pogue D (2012) The remote control in your mind. Sci Am 307(6):32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pynadath DV, Tambe M (2002) Revisiting asimov’s first law: a response to the call to arms. In: Intelligent agents VIII, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 307–320Google Scholar
  63. Raabe O, Wacker R, Funk C, Oberle D, Baumann C (2010) Lawful service engineering-Formalisierung des Rechts im Internet der Dienste. Globale Sicherheit und proaktiver Staat-Die Rolle der Rechtsinformatik 266:643–650Google Scholar
  64. RACTER (1985) The policeman’s beard is half-constructed: computer prose and poetry by Racter. Warner Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  65. Reese RA (2008) Transformativeness and the Derivative Work Right. Columbia J Law Arts 31(4):2012–2054MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  66. Reichardt J (1978) Robots: fact, fiction+ prediction. Thames & Hudson Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  67. Riedl MO (2014) The Lovelace 2.0 test of artificial creativity and intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.6142Google Scholar
  68. Roos JW (2005) Copyright protection as access barrier for people who read differently: the case for an international approach. IFLA J 31(1):52–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rowe R (1993) Interactive music systems: machine listening and composing. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  70. Rowe E (2001) Machine musicianship. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  71. Schlegel A et al (2015) The artist emerges: visual art learning alters neural structure and function. NeuroImage 105:440–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schöffer N (1969) La ville cybernétique. Tchou, ParisGoogle Scholar
  73. Searle J (1980) Minds. Brains Programs Behav Brain Sci 3(3):417–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sharkey A, Sharkey N (2012) Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics Inf Technol 14(1):27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Shinkareva SV et al (2008) Using fMRI brain activation to identify cognitive states associated with perception of tools and dwellings. PLoS One 3(1):e1394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Solso RL (2000) The cognitive neuroscience of art: a preliminary fMRI observation. J Conscious Studi 7(8–9):75–86Google Scholar
  77. Stamp M (2003) Digital rights management: the technology behind the hype. J Electron Commer Res 4(3):102–112Google Scholar
  78. Ward JA (1992) Copyrighting context: law for plumbing’s sake. Colum-VLA JL Arts 17:159Google Scholar
  79. Weld D, Etzioni O (1994) The first law of robotics (a call to arms). AAAI 94(1994):1042–1047Google Scholar
  80. Wiggins GA (2006) A preliminary framework for description, analysis and comparison of creative systems. Knowl-Based Syst 19(7):449–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wolpaw JR et al (2002) Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin Neurophysiol 113(6):767–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Xenakis I (2001) Formalized music: thought and mathematics in composition (Harmonologia series no. 6). Pendragon Press, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Burkhard Schafer
    • 1
  • David Komuves
    • 1
  • Jesus Manuel Niebla Zatarain
    • 1
  • Laurence Diver
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Law, SCRIPT CentreThe University of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations