Abstract
In this paper, we present an approach to commonsense causal explanation of stories that can be used for automatically determining the liable party in legal case descriptions. The approach is based on \({\mathsf {LRICore}}\), a core ontology for law that takes a commonsense perspective. Aside from our thesis that in the legal domain many terms still have a strong commonsense flavour, the descriptions of events in legal cases, as e.g. presented at judicial trials, are cast in commonsense terms as well. We present design principles for representing commonsense causation, and describe a process-based approach to automatic identification of causal relations in stories, which are described in terms of the core ontology. The resulting causal explanation forms a necessary condition for determining the liability and responsibility of agents that play a role in the case. We describe the basic architecture and working of \({\mathsf {DIRECT}}\), the demonstrator we are constructing to test the validity of our process oriented view on commonsense causation. This view holds that causal relations are in fact abstractions constructed on the basis of our commonsense understanding of physical and mental processes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ashley, K. (1990). Modeling Legal Argument. MIT Press.
Aleven, V. (1997). Teaching Case Based Argumentation Through an Example and Models. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Bredeweg B., Struss P. (2004). Current topics in qualitative reasoning. AI Magazine 24:13–16, special issue on Qualitative Reasoning.
Breuker, J. and Hoekstra, R. (2004a). Core Concepts of Law: Taking Common-sense Seriously. In: Proceedings of Formal Ontologies in Information Systems, FOIS-2004. IOS-Press.
Breuker, J. and Hoekstra, R. (2004b). DIRECT: Ontology based Discovery of Responsibility and Causality in Legal Case Descriptions. In: Gordon, T. (ed.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2004: The Seventeenth Annual Conference. Amsterdam, 59–68, IOS Press.
Breuker, J. and Hoekstra, R. (2004c). Epistemology and Ontology in Core Ontologies: FOLaw and LRI-Core, Two Core Ontologies for Law. In: Proceedings of EKAW Workshop on Core ontologies. http://sunsite.informatik.rwthaachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/, CEUR
Breuker, J., Valente, A., and Winkels, R. (2006). Use and Reuse of Legal Ontologies in Knowledge Engineering and Information Management. Artificial Intelligence and Law 12:241–277.
Clark H. (1996) Using Language. Cambridge University Press.
Davidson D. (2001) Essays on Actions and Events, 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Forbus K. D. (1984) Qualitative Process Theory. Artificial Intelligence 24:85–168.
Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A., and Schneider, L. (2002). Sweetening Ontologies with DOLCE. In Gomez-Perez, A. and Benjamins, V. (eds.), Proceedings of the EKAW-2002, 166–181. Springer.
Georgeff M., Pell B., Pollack M., Tambe M., Wooldridge M. (1999) The Belief-Desire-Intention Model of Agency. In: Müller J., Singh M.P., Rao A.S. (eds) Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Intelligent Agents V: Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL-98), Vol. 1555. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, pp 1–10.
Hart H., Honor’e T. (1985) Causation in the Law, 2nd edition. New York, Oxford University Press.
Hayes, P. J. (1985). The Second Naive Physics Manifesto. In Hobbs J.R., Moore R.C. (eds) Formal Theories of the Common Sense World, 1–36. Norwood, Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Hobbs, J. R. and Moore, R. C. (eds.) (1985). Formal Theories of the Common Sense World. Ablex Publishing Company: Norwood.
Hoekstra R., Breuker J. (2005) Processes as Causal Glue in a Framework for Ontology-Based Responsibility Attribution. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Legal Ontologies and Artificial Intelligence Techniques, in conjunction with ICAIL 2005. Bologna, Italy.
Horn, W. (ed.) (1990) Causal AI Models: Steps Toward Applications. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
Kim J. (1998) Mind in a Physical World: An Essay on the Mind-Body Problem and Mental Causation, Representation and Mind. Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.
Lehmann, J. (2003). Causation in Artificial Intelligence and Law: A Modelling Approach. Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam.
Lehmann J., Borgo S., Masolo C., Gangemi A. (2004) Causality and Causation in DOLCE. In: Varzi A. C., Vieu L. (eds) Formal Ontology in Information Systems Proceedings of the International Conference FOIS 2004. Torino, IOS Press, pp 273–284.
Lehmann J., Breuker J., Brouwer B. (2005) CausatiONT: Modeling Causation in AI& Law. In: Benjamins V., Casanovas P., Breuker J., Gangemi A. (eds) Law and the Semantic Web, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (3369). Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, pp 77–96.
Lehmann, J. and Gangemi, A. (2006). An Ontology of Physical Causation as a Basis for Assessing Causation in Fact and Attributing Legal Responsibility. Artificial Inteligence and Law. Special Issue on Legal Ontologies and Artificial Intelligence Techniques.
Pearl J. (2000) Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Schaffer, J. (2003). The Metaphysics of Causation/Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Sowa J. F. (2000) Knowledge Representation: Logical Philosophical, and Computational Foundations. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole Publishing Co.
Valente A. (1995) Legal Knowledge Engineering: A Modelling Approach. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
Valente, A. and Breuker, J. (1996) Towards Principled Core Ontologies. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop. Banff, Alberta, Canada.
van Heijst G., Schreiber A. T., Wielinga B. (1997) Using Explicit Ontologies for KBS Development. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 46(2/3):183–292.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Hoekstra, R., Breuker, J. Commonsense Causal Explanation in a Legal Domain. Artif Intell Law 15, 281–299 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-007-9033-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-007-9033-5