Abstract
Within the research framework of pragma-dialectics, this study analysed and assessed strategic manoeuvring by dissociation in corporate crisis communication, exemplified by the 2017 United Airlines’ Passenger Dragging-off Incident. As shown from the analysis of the public statements issued on its official website and Twitter, United Airlines adopted dissociation using the lexical item “volunteer” in the different stages of argumentation: bringing forward a standpoint, maintaining a standpoint and mitigating a standpoint. In so doing, the corporation strategically manoeuvred the topical potential and the presentational devices to meet the demands of its primary audience, i.e. the international general public. Whereas employing dissociation of the notion “volunteer” seemed to be reasonable and served the corporation’s interests best, its argumentative effectiveness was called into question based upon the general rules for critical discussion and the institutional context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Contract of Carriage Document. Retrieved 18 September 2018, from https://www.united.com/ual/en/cn/fly/contract-of-carriage.html.
Coombs, W.T. 2007. Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review 10(3): 163–176.
Guth, D.W. 1995. Organizational crisis experience and public relations roles. Public Relations Review 21(2): 123–136.
Jing, M., and R. Liu. 2008. A study on corporate crisis communication: The case of Huang Guangyu Being Investigated. News and Writing 12: 40–41.
Li, Bin. 2018. Research on crisis PR model of internet enterprises in crisis situation. Operation and Management 1: 93–96.
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. 2007. Retrieved 1 December 2018, from https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/volunteer.
Perelman, C., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The new rhetoric. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Ritivoi, A. 2008. The dissociation of concepts in context: An analytic template for assessing its role in actual situations. Argumentation and Advocacy 44(4): 185–197.
Rubinelli, S. 2007. Comments on “Strategic Maneuvering with Dissociation”. Argumentation 20(4): 489–493.
Schiappa, E. 1985. Dissociation in the arguments of rhetorical theory. The Journal of the American Forensic Association 22(2): 72–82.
Shi, A.B. 2008. The “Western Paradigm” of crisis communication research and its “Localization” in Chinese context. Journal of International Communication 6: 22–27.
Statement from United Airlines CEO, Oscar Munoz, on United Express flight 3411. Retrieved 18 September 2018, from https://hub.united.com/united-express-3411-statement-oscar-munoz-2355968629.html?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=referral.
United Express Flight 3411 Review and Action Report, Retrieved 18 September 2018, from https://hub.united.com/united-review-action-report-2380196105.html.
van Eemeren, F.H. 2010. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amstedam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
van Eemeren, F.H. 2019. Argumentative style: A complex notion. Argumentation 33(3): 153–171.
van Eemeren, F.H., and P. Wu (eds.). 2017. Contextualizing pragma-dialectics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. London: Routledge.
van Rees, A. 2009. Dissociation in argumentative discussions: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Dordrecht: Springer.
van Rees, A. 2006. Strategic maneuvering with dissociation. Argumentation 20(4): 473–487.
Veil, S.R., T. Buehner, and M.J. Palenchar. 2011. A work-in-process literature review: Incorporating social media in risk and crisis communication. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 19(2): 110–122.
Waisanen, D. 2011. Political conversion as intrapersonal argument: Self-dissociation in David Brock’s Blinded by the Right. Argumentation and Advocacy 47(4): 228–245.
Wang, Z.Z., and Chu, J.X. 2010. Analysis of restrictive factors of corporate crisis communication: Take the food safety crisis as an example. Journalism Communication 04: 32–33.
Wu, P. 2019. Confrontational maneuvering by dissociation in spokespersons’ argumentative replies at the press conferences of China’s ministry of foreign affairs. Argumentation 33(1): 1–22.
Zarefsky, D., C. Miller-Tutzauer, and F.E. Tutzauer. 1984. Reagan’s safety net for the truly needy: The rhetorical uses of definition. Communication Studies 35(2): 113–119.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Feng, J., Zhao, F. & Feng, A. Strategic Manoeuvring by Dissociation in Corporate Crisis Communication: The Case of the 2017 United Airlines’ Passenger Dragging-Off Incident. Argumentation 35, 321–338 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09530-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09530-2