Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.): From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild: A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory

Cham (CH), Springer (= Argumentation Library, 35), 2020, 289 pp

  • Book Review
  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. In English, as opposed to other European languages, the word ‘argument’ can also refer to the process of arguing and even to a particular kind of communicative situation in which the arguers are aggressive or uncivil to each other. This being a quirk of English, I propose to ignore it here and go with the majority of languages.

References

  • Anscombre, J.-C., and O. Ducrot. 1983. L’argumentation dans la langue. Brussels: Pierre Mardaga.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongiovanni, G., G. Postema, A. Rotolo, G. Sartor, C. Valentini, and D. Walton (eds.). 2018. Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. 1986. De la problématologie. Brussels: Pierre Mardaga.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. 2008. Principia rhetorica: Une théorie générale de l’argumentation. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, C., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1958. Traité de l’argumentation: La nouvelle rhétorique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. [English: The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, translated by J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver, Notre Dame, IN, University of Notre Dame Press, 1969].

  • Puppo, F. 2019. Informal Logic: A ‘Canadian’ Approach to Argument. Windsor (ON): Windsor Studies in Argumentation.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinelli, S. 2009. Ars Topica: The Classical Technique of Constructing Arguments from Aristotle to Cicero. Cham (CH): Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren, F.H. 2010. Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren, F.H. 2015. Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. Cham (CH): Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren, F.H. 2018. Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Cham (CH): Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren, F.H., and B. Garssen (eds.). 2019. Argumentation in Actual Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren, F.H., B. Garssen, E.C.W. Krabbe, A.F. Snoeck Henkemans, B. Verheij, and J.H.M. Wagemans. 2014. Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D.N. 1989. Question-Reply Argumentation. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiśniewski, A. 1995. The Posing of Questions: Logical Foundations of Erotetic Inferences. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wiśniewski, A. 2013. Questions, Inferences, and Scenarios. London: College Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education, University of Guadalajara, University Center for the Social Sciences and the Humanities (Belenes), 150 José Parres Arias Avenue, 45132, Zapopan, Jal., Mexico

    Fernando Leal

Authors
  1. Fernando Leal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando Leal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leal, F. Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.): From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild: A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory. Argumentation 34, 389–397 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09514-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09514-2

Search

Navigation