Must a Successful Argument Convert an Ideal Audience?
- 448 Downloads
Peter van Inwagen defines a successful argument in philosophy as one that can be used to convert an audience of ideal agnostics in an ideal debate. Sarah McGrath and Thomas Kelly recently argue that van Inwagen’s definition cannot be correct since the idea of ideal agnostics is incoherent with regard to an absolute paradigm of a successful philosophical argument. This paper defends van Inwagen’s definition against McGrath and Kelly’s objection.
KeywordsArgument Philosophy Ideal agnostics The epistemological approach Peter van Inwagen
I'd like to thank Nathan Ballantyne, Stephen Grimm, David Kovacs, Emily Sullivan, and two anonymous referees for their help comments on earlier versions of this paper.
- Cherniak, C. 1986. Minimal rationality. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Feldman, Richard. 1994. Good arguments. In Socializing epistemology: The social dimensions of knowledge, ed. Frederick F. Schmitt, 159–188. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Lumer, Christoph. 1991. Structure and function of argumentations. An epistemological approach to determining criteria for the validity and adequacy of argumentations. In Proceedings of the second international conference on argumentation, ed. Frans H. van Eemeren, et al., 98–107. Amsterdam: Sicsat.Google Scholar
- Lumer, C. 2005a. The epistemological approach to argumentation—A map. Informal Logic 25(3): 189–212.Google Scholar
- Lumer, C. 2005b. The epistemological theory of argument: How and why? Informal Logic 25(3): 214–232.Google Scholar
- McGrath, S., and Kelly, T. forthcoming. Are there any successful philosophical arguments? In Being, Freedom, and Method: Themes from van Inwagen, ed. John Keller, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Plato. 1997. In Complete works. eds. Cooper, J.M., and Hutchinson, D.S. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
- Pojman, L. 2005. A defense of the death penalty. In contemporary debates in applied ethics, ed. Andrew Cohen, and Christopher Wellman, 107–123. Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
- Siegel, H. 1997. Rationality redeemed?: Further dialogues on an educational ideal. London: Routledge.Google Scholar