An ad hominem fallacy is committed when an individual employs an irrelevant personal attack against an opponent instead of addressing that opponent’s argument. Many discussions of such fallacies discuss judgments of relevance about such personal attacks, and consider how we might distinguish those that are relevant from those that are not. This paper will argue that the literature on bias and testimony can helpfully contribute to that analysis. This will highlight ways in which biases, particularly unconscious biases, can make ad hominem fallacies seem effective, even when the irrelevance is recognized.
KeywordsCritical thinking Informal logic Ad hominem fallacies Credibility Testimony Bias Unconscious bias
I would like to thank Cindy Holder, Mike Raven, Bryan Renne, as well as two anonymous referees for helpful comments and discussions about this paper.
- Audi, R. 1997. The place of testimony in the fabric of knowledge and justification. American Philosophical Quarterly 34(4): 405–422.Google Scholar
- Baier, A. 1986. Trust and anti-trust. Ethics 96: 231–260.Google Scholar
- Fowler, M.C. 2008. The ethical practice of critical thinking. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Govier, T. 1993. When logic meets politics: Testimony, distrust, and rhetorical disadvantage. Informal Logic XV(2): 93–104.Google Scholar
- Hurley, P.J. 2006. A concise introduction to logic, 9th edn. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
- Jones, K. 2001. The politics of credibility. In A mind of one’s own, 2nd edn. ed. L. Antony, C. Witt, pp. 154–177. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Kenyon, T. 2008. Clear thinking in a blurry world. Toronto, ON: Thomson Nelson.Google Scholar
- Saul, J. 2011. Implicit bias, stereotype threat and women in philosophy. Available at http://www.sheffield.ac.uk/content/1/c6/03/49/18/BiasAndPhilosophy11.doc.
- Valian, V. 1998. Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- van Eemeren, F., B. Garssen, and B. Meuffels. 2009. Fallacies and judgments of reasonableness, volume 16 of argumentation library, chapter 3, pp. 51–83. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- van Eemeren, F.H., R. Grootendorst, and F.S. Henkemans. 1996. Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Vaughn, L., and C. MacDonald. 2010. The power of critical thinking, 2nd edn. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Walton, D. 2004. Relevance in argumentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Woods, J., and D. Walton 1998. Argument: The logic of the fallacies. Toronto, ON: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar