Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comment on ‹Constrained Maneuvering: Rhetoric as a Rational Enterprise’

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 17 September 2019

This article has been updated

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Change history

  • 17 September 2019

    In the original publication of the article, the commentary of mine to Christopher Tindale���s article ���Constrained Maneuvering: Rhetoric as a Rational Enterprise��� (Argumentation 2006, Vol 20, 4, pp. 447���466), English translations of phrasings regarding several distinctions in the concept of rationality were taken from Stefan Gosepath���s book Aufgekl��rtes Eigeninteresse: Eine Theorie theoretischer und praktischer Rationalit��t, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp 1992, without providing reference to his publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Communication Sciences, University of Lugano, Via G. Buffi 13, Lugano, CH 6900, Switzerland

    Peter J. Schulz

Authors
  1. Peter J. Schulz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter J. Schulz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schulz, P.J. Comment on ‹Constrained Maneuvering: Rhetoric as a Rational Enterprise’. Argumentation 20, 467–471 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9023-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9023-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation