Skip to main content
Log in

Archives as sediments: metaphors of deposition and archival thinking

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archival Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In their Manual for the Arrangement and Description of Archives, Muller, Feith, and Fruin compared the accumulation of archival materials with the geological process of deposit of sedimentary materials. This metaphor remained embedded in the European archival traditions and has continued to be discussed until the present, for instance, in the Italian archival literature. This paper explores, from a historical perspective, how and why this metaphor was adopted during the foundational period of modern archival science. The paper analyzes the links between geology and archival science as enterprises involved with historical reconstruction. The paper argues that as palaetiological disciplines, both shared a concern with issues of evidence in the study of individual, historically formed entities. Viewing the formation of archives as parallel to the deposition of sediments provided archival scholars at the turn of the twentieth century with a way of conceptualizing archival thinking as positive scientific knowledge of an essentially individual entity: the archives. This metaphor aligned archival science along with other historical sciences that could boast a measure of reputation and success. The metaphor also matched perfectly the modernist regime of historicity characteristic of the foundational period and culture of the modern archival discipline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The distinction refers to two ends of the spectrum of the possibilities of accumulation of records. The archivethesaurus is an accumulation of selected records, traditionally charters, treaties, and other such important documents that provided evidence of privileges and rights; the archive-sediment refers to the continuous and spontaneous accumulation of records from daily activities. Historically, the move from archive-thesaurus to archive-sediment reflects the transition in institutional structures from the late medieval to the modern period. See Caravaca 2015.

References

  • Bautier R-H (1961) Les archives. In: Samaran C (ed) L’histoire et ses méthodes. Encyclopédie de la Pléiade, v. 11. Galimard, Paris, pp 1120–1167

    Google Scholar 

  • Bologna M (2017) Historical sedimentation of archival materials: reinterpreting a foundational concept in the Italian archival tradition. Archivaria 83:35–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Brothman B (2006) Archives, life cycles, and death wishes: a helical model of record formation. Archivaria 61:235–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke P (2003) Images as evidence in seventeenth-century Europe. J Hist Ideas 64:273–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burtin F-X (1784) Oryctographie de Bruxelles. Impr. De la Marie, Bruxelles

  • Cuvier G (1997) Extract from a memoir on an animal of which the bones are found in the plaster stone around Paris, and which appears no longer to exist alive today. [Originally published in 1812] In: Rudwick MJS (ed) Georges Cuvier, fossil bones, and geological catastrophes: new translations and interpretations of the primary texts. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  • Eknoyan G (2007) Looking at the urine: the renaissance of an unbroken tradition. Am J Kidney Dis 49:865–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gere C (2002) Inscribing nature: archaeological metaphors and the formation of new sciences. Pub Archaeol 2:195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginzburg C (1980) Morelli, Freud and Sherlock Holmes: clues and scientific method. Hist Workshop 9:5–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartog F (2015) Regimes of historicity: presentism and experiences of time. Columbia University Press, New York (Translated by Saskia Brown)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hooke R (1705) Lectures and discourse of earthquakes, and subterraneous eruptions. In: The posthumous works of Dr. Robert Hooke. Smith & Walford, London, pp 279–450

  • Horsman P, Ketelaar E, Thomassen T (2003) New respect for the old order: the context of the Dutch manual. Am Arch 66:249–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu K-T (2009) The path to Steno’s synthesis on the animal origin of glossopetrae. In: Rosenberg GD (ed) The revolution in geology from the renaissance to the enlightenment, vol 203. Geological Society of America Memoir, Boulder, pp 93–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley TH (1896) On the method of the Zadig. In: Science and Hebrew tradition: essays. Appleton, New York, pp 1–23

  • Ilerbaig J (2016) Organisms, skeletons, and the archivist as paleontologist: metaphors of archival order and reconstruction in context. In: Foscarini F, MacNeil H, Mak B, Oliver G (eds) Engaging with records and archives: histories and theories. Facet, London, pp 21–40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson H (1937) A manual of archive administration, 2nd edn. Percy Lund, Humphries & Co, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan E (1963) Robert Recorde and the authorities of uroscopy. Bull Hist Med 37:65–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodolini E (1985) Archivistica: principi e problemi [Archival science: principles and problems], 2nd edn. Franco Angelli, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Mata Caravaca M (2015) The concept of archival ‘sedimentation’: its meaning and use in the Italian context. Arch Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9256-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Momigliano A (1950) Ancient history and the antiquarian. J Warburg Courtauld Inst 13:285–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller S, Feith KJ, Fruin R (1940) Manual for the arrangement and description of archives. H.W. Wilson, New York (Translation of Handleiding voor het ordenen en beschrijven van archieven, 2nd ed., 1920, by AH Leavitt)

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldroyd D (1979) Historicism and the rise of historical geology. Hist Sci 17(191–213):227–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Procter M (2008) Life before Jenkinson: the development of British archival theory and thought at the turn of the twentieth century. Archives 33:136–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport R (1982) Borrowed words: problems of vocabulary in eighteenth-century geology. Br J Hist Sci 15:27–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport R (1997) When geologists were historians, 1665-1750. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rudwick MJS (2005) Bursting the limits of time: the reconstruction of geohistory in the age of revolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steno N (1669) De solido intra solidum naturaliter contento dissertationis prodromus. Florence (English translation: The prodromus of Nicolaus Steno’s dissertation concerning a solid body enclosed by process of nature within a solid). Macmillan, London, 1916

  • Whewell W (1847) Philosophy of the inductive sciences. John Parker, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodall J (1617) The surgions mate, or military and domestique surgery. London

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Fiorella Foscarini for her comments on this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Ilerbaig.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ilerbaig, J. Archives as sediments: metaphors of deposition and archival thinking. Arch Sci 21, 83–95 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-020-09350-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-020-09350-z

Keywords

Navigation