Archival interventions and the language we use

Wright, Kirsten

doi:10.1007/s10502-019-09306-y

Original Paper
Published: 15 May 2019

Archival interventions and the language we use

Kirsten Wright ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7862-7012¹

Archival Science volume 19, pages 331–348 (2019)Cite this article

2260 Accesses
7 Citations
10 Altmetric
Metrics details

Abstract

This article discusses issues around the display and use of historical language now considered offensive. Taking as a starting point the non-neutrality of archives, archival systems and documentation, it considers the role of archivists in upholding and reproducing dominant power structures through archival description. It also examines the implications of the uncritical reproduction of historical language in archival description, catalogues and finding aids. It considers the balancing act between reproducing this language and potentially causing offence and distress, and not providing full and accurate information if it is not displayed. While much has been written previously about these issues, there are fewer links to practical actions which may be taken to mitigate these issues. Therefore, a case study is presented using the Language Policy developed by the Find & Connect web resource in Australia, to consider how archives and archivists can be more transparent in their archival description practices. It discusses the development and content of the policy, implications for work on the web resource, and public reception to the policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Library, Information and Resource Network (2005) Protocols for libraries, archives and information services. http://atsilirn.aiatsis.gov.au/protocols.php. Accessed 4 Apr 2018
Arroyo-Ramirez E (2016) Invisible defaults and perceived limitations: processing the Juan Gelman files. https://medium.com/on-archivy/invisible-defaults-and-perceived-limitations-processing-the-juan-gelman-files-4187fdd36759. Accessed 28 Oct 2018
Bailey J (2013) Disrespect des fonds: rethinking arrangement and description in born-digital archives. Arch J. http://dev.archivejournal.net/essays/disrespect-des-fonds-rethinking-arrangement-and-description-in-born-digital-archives/. Accessed 18 Oct 2018
Barry P (2009) Beginning theory: an introduction to literary and cultural theory, 3rd edn. Manchester University Press, New York
Google Scholar
Bastian J (2002) Taking custody, giving access: a postcustodial role for a new century. Archivaria 53:76–93
Google Scholar
Brilmyer G (2018) Archival assemblages: applying disability studies’ political/relational model to archival description. Arch Sci 18:95–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-018-9287-6
Article Google Scholar
Care Leavers Australasia Network (2016) Submission #13 to Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse Records & recordkeeping practices consultation paper. https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/sites/default/files/file-list/Consultation%20Paper%20-%20Records%20and%20recordkeeping%20Practices%20-%20Submission%20-%2013%20CLAN.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2018
Caswell M (2014) Seeing yourself in history: community archives and the fight against symbolic annihilation. Public Hist 36(4):26–37. https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2014.36.4.26
Article Google Scholar
Caswell M, Cifor M (2016) From human rights to feminist ethics: radical empathy in the archives. Archivaria 81:23–43
Google Scholar
Cifor M, Gilliland A (2016) Affect and the archive, archives and their affects: an introduction to the special issue. Arch Sci 16:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9263-3
Article Google Scholar
Cook T (1997) What is past is prologue: a history of archival ideas since 1898, and the future paradigm shift. Archivaria 43:17–63
Google Scholar
Cook T, Schwartz JM (2002) Archives, records, and power: from (postmodern) theory to (archival) performance. Arch Sci 2:171–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435620
Article Google Scholar
de Jesus N (2014) Locating the library in institutional oppression, in the library with the lead pipe. http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2014/locating-the-library-in-institutional-oppression/. Accessed 10 Mar 2019
Department of Social Services (2015) Access to records by Forgotten Australians and Former Child Migrants: access principles for records holders, best practice guidelines in providing access to records. https://www.dss.gov.au/families-and-children/programmes-services/family-relationships/find-and-connect-services-and-projects/access-to-records-by-forgotten-australians-and-former-child-migrants-access-principles-for-records-holders-best-practice-guidelines-in-providing-access. Accessed 13 Apr 2018
Department of Social Services (2018) National redress scheme. https://www.nationalredress.gov.au/. Accessed 30 Oct 2018
Drake J (2016) RadTech Meets RadArch: towards a new principle for archives and archival description. https://medium.com/on-archivy/radtech-meets-radarch-towards-a-new-principle-for-archives-and-archival-description-568f133e4325. Accessed 5 Nov 2018
Duff W, Harris V (2002) Stories and names: archival description as narrating records and constructing meanings. Arch Sci 2:263–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435625
Article Google Scholar
Ettarh F (2018) Vocational awe and librarianship: the lies we tell ourselves, in the library with the lead pipe. http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2018/vocational-awe/. Accessed 10 Mar 2019
Farge A (2013) The allure of the archives, translated by Thomas Scott-Railton. Yale University Press, New Haven
Find & Connect web resource (2016) Content warning. https://www.findandconnect.gov.au/about/content-warning/. Accessed 16 Mar 2018
Find & Connect web resource (2017) Language policy: the words we use. https://www.findandconnect.gov.au/about/policies/language-policy-the-words-we-use/. Accessed 16 Mar 2018
Find & Connect web resource (2018) Explaining the words on child welfare records, https://www.findandconnect.gov.au/resources/explaining-the-words-on-child-welfare-records/. Accessed 30 Oct 2018
First Archivists Circle (2006) Protocols for Native American archival materials.: http://www2.nau.edu/libnap-p/protocols.html. Accessed 10 Mar 2019
Fourmile H (1988) Who owns the past? Aborigines as captives of the archives, paper given at the Aborigines making history conference, Canberra, May 1988. http://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/p72111/pdf/article017.pdf. Accessed 23 Apr 2018
Frings-Hessami V (2018) Care Leavers’ records: a case for a repurposed archive continuum model. Arch Manuscr 46(2):158–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2018.1444996
Article Google Scholar
George G, George K (2014) Minda home for weak-minded children (1898–1911). Find & Connect Web Resource. https://www.findandconnect.gov.au/ref/sa/biogs/SE00161b.htm. Accessed 17 Apr 2019
Gilliland AJ (2017) A matter of life or death: a critical examination of the role of official records and archives in supporting the agency of the forcibly displaced. J Crit Libr Inf Stud 1:2. https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.36
Article Google Scholar
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1997) Bringing them home: national inquiry into the separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from their families, Commonwealth of Australia, Sydney. https://bth.humanrights.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/bringing_them_home_report.pdf. Accessed 5 Apr 2018
Humphreys C, Kertesz M (2012) ‘Putting the heart back into the record’: personal records to support young people in care. Adopt Foster 36(1):27–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/030857591203600105
Article Google Scholar
Hurley C (2005) Parallel provenance (if these are your records, where are your stories?). Arch Manuscr 33(1, 2). https://www.descriptionguy.com/images/WEBSITE/parallel-provenance.pdf. Accessed 27 Aug 2018
Jimerson RC (2009) Archives power: memory, accountability, and social justice. Society of American Archivists, Chicago
Google Scholar
Jones M, O’Neill C (2014) Identity, records and archival evidence: exploring the needs of Forgotten Australians and Former Child Migrants. Arch Rec 35(2):110–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2014.951032
Article Google Scholar
Kelleher C (2017) Archives without archives: (re)locating and (re)defining the archive through post-custodial praxis. J Crit Libr Inf Stud 1:2. https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.29
Article Google Scholar
Ketelaar E (2002) Archival temples, archival prisons. Arch Sci 2:221–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435623
Article Google Scholar
Library and Archives Canada (2018) Project naming. https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/discover/aboriginal-heritage/project-naming/Pages/introduction.aspx. Accessed 4 Apr 2018
Lyons B (2009) Writing archives/crafting order: a critique on the longstanding archival practices of arrangement and description. Masters thesis, University of Kansas
Maier C (2003) Overcoming the past? Narrative and negotiation, remembering and reparation: issues at the interface of history and the law. In: Torpey J (ed) Politics and the past: on repairing historical injustices. Rowman & Littlefield, New York, pp 295–304
Google Scholar
McCarthy G, Evans J (2012) Principles for archival information services in the public domain. Arch Manuscr 40(1):54–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2012.670872
Article Google Scholar
McCarthy G, Smith A, Jones M (2014) Looking beyond the archive: utilising encoded archival context in a broader societal context. J Arch Org 12(1–2):143–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332748.2015.1001206
Article Google Scholar
McCorquodale J (1986) The legal classification of race in Australia. Aborig Hist 10:7–24. http://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/p71821/pdf/article024.pdf. Accessed 17 Apr 2019
National Library of New Zealand (2018) Ngā Upoko Tukutuku/Māori Subject Headings. https://natlib.govt.nz/nga-upoko-tukutuku. Accessed 4 Apr 2018
Nesmith T (2002) Seeing archives, postmodernism and the changing intellectual place of archives. Am Arch 65(1):21–41. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.65.1.rr48450509r0712u
Article Google Scholar
Noble S (2018) Algorithms of oppression: how search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press, New York
Book Google Scholar
O’Flynn D, Szekir-Papasavva S, Trainor R (2018) Art, power, and the asylum: Adamson, healing, and the collection. Lancet Psychiatry 5:396–399. http://www.adamsoncollectiontrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Art-power-and-the-asylum.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2019
O’Neill C (2014) Chief Secretary’s Department (1901–1979). Find & Connect Web Resource. https://www.findandconnect.gov.au/ref/vic/biogs/E000490b.htm. Accessed 24 Feb 2019
O’Neill C, Selakovic V, Tropea R (2012) Access to records for people who were in out-of-home care: moving beyond ‘third dimension’ archival practice. Arch Manuscr 40(1):29–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2012.668841
Article Google Scholar
Parry N (2014) Belmont Crippled Children’s Home (1952–1979). Find & Connect Web Resource. https://www.findandconnect.gov.au/ref/nsw/biogs/NE01614b.htm. Accessed 17 Apr 2019
Rinn MR (2018) Nineteenth-century depictions of disabilities and modern metadata: a consideration of material in the P. T. Barnum digital collection. J Contemp Arch Stud 5:1
Article Google Scholar
Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse (2017a) Final report. https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/final-report. Accessed 28 Oct 2018
Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse (2017b) Final report: volume 16: religious institutions: book 1. https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/religious-institutions. Accessed 28 Oct 2018
Salter M (2018) Abuse and cruelty in religious bureaucracy: the case of the Anglican Diocese of Newcastle. J Aust Stud 42(2):243–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/14443058.2018.1459782
Article Google Scholar
Senate Community Affairs Reference Committee (2001) Lost innocents: righting the record—report on child migration, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Community_Affairs/Completed_inquiries/1999-02/child_migrat/report/index. Accessed 9 Apr 2018
Senate Community Affairs Reference Committee (2004) Forgotten Australians: a report on Australians who experienced institutional or out-of-home care as children, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Community_Affairs/Completed_inquiries/2004-07/inst_care/report/index. Accessed 9 Apr 2018
Sentance N (2017) Maker Unknown and the decentring of first nations people. Archival decolonialist. https://archivaldecolonist.com/2017/07/21/maker-unknown-and-the-decentring-first-nations-people/. Accessed 10 Mar 2019
Sentance N (2018a) What is our purpose? Archival decolonialist. https://archivaldecolonist.com/2018/12/29/what-is-our-purpose/. Accessed 10 Mar 2019
Sentance (2018b) Diversity means disruption, archival decolonialist. https://archivaldecolonist.com/2018/11/28/diversity-means-disruption/. Accessed 10 Mar 2019
Stanley E (2016) The road to hell: state violence against children in postwar New Zealand. Auckland University Press, Auckland
Google Scholar
State Library of Western Australia (2018). Storylines. https://storylines.slwa.wa.gov.au/welcome. Accessed 4 Apr 2018
Swain S (2014) Stakeholders as subjects: the role of historians in the development of Australia’s Find & Connect web resource. Public Hist 36(4):38–50. https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2014.36.4.38
Article Google Scholar
Swain S, Musgrove N (2012) We are the stories we tell about ourselves: child welfare records and the construction of identity among Australians who, as children, experienced out-of-home ‘care’. Arch Manuscr 40(1):4–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2012.668840
Article Google Scholar
Turner R (2018) ‘Aboriginal’ redacted from birth, death, marriage certificates after being deemed an offensive term, ABC news. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-05-17/aboriginal-term-deemed-offensive-births-deaths-marriages/9753430. Accessed 18 May 2018
Valderhaug G (2011) Memory, justice and the public record. Arch Sci 11(1–2):13–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-010-9110-5
Article Google Scholar
Veselinovic M (2015) Dutch museum renaming art for cultural sensitivity. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2015/12/14/world/rijksmuseum-renaming-artworks/. Accessed 4 Apr 2018
Wilson JZ, Golding F (2016) Latent scrutiny: personal archives as perpetual mementos of official gaze. Arch Sci 16:93–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9255-3
Article Google Scholar
Yakel E (2003) Archival representation. Arch Sci 3:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02438926
Article Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Find & Connect web resource is funded by the Department of Social Services, Australia. The author would like to thank members of the Find & Connect web resource team, and two anonymous reviewers, for their comments on earlier drafts of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

eScholarship Research Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Kirsten Wright

Authors

Kirsten Wright
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kirsten Wright.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wright, K. Archival interventions and the language we use. Arch Sci 19, 331–348 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09306-y

Download citation

Published: 15 May 2019
Issue Date: December 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09306-y

Keywords

Archival description
Historical language
Archival policy
Archives
Transparency in documentation