Advertisement

Archival Science

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 429–451 | Cite as

Activating the archive: rethinking the role of traditional archives for local activist projects

  • Alexandrina Buchanan
  • Michelle Bastian
Original Paper

Abstract

This article explores the way archival material has the potential to become a core component of activism, through an evaluation of an AHRC-funded collaborative research project on the histories and futures of local food in Liverpool. “Memories of Mr Seel’s Garden: exploring past and future food systems in Liverpool” is a collaboration between four academics, two arts/heritage professionals and three community groups, around the theme of local food. The community groups were brought together by their mutual interest in exploring how historical work might contribute to the developing local food movement. The project aimed to undertake research into the history of local food systems, using three different methods: archival research, map research and oral history, in order to develop deeper understanding of food systems, both historically and geographically and to explore what this understanding might contribute to future community activism. The project examined whether undertaking the research changed participants’ awareness of the value of historical research (including the value of different methods); their understandings of the local environment and local food issues, or provided new perspectives on the possibility of future change and their role within it. In short, could historical research assist local activism? The article will describe the methods used and the research findings, which suggest that even “traditional” archival materials, neither created nor selected for activist purposes, have the potential to be valuable resources for activist projects, both for challenging simplistic activist narratives about the past and for empowering members of activist communities to develop new narratives for change and communicate these to wider society.

Keywords

Activism Affect Participatory research Local food Local history 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/J006629/1). Please contact the authors if you are interested in accessing the supporting research materials. The authors would like to acknowledge with gratitude the financial support of the AHRC and, especially, to thank the whole Mr Seel's Garden research team for their contribution to the project.

References

  1. Adam B (1999) Industrial food for thought: timescapes of risk. Environ Values 8:219–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bahde A, Smedberg H (2012) Measuring the magic: assessment in the special collections and archives classroom. RBM J Rare Books Manuscr Cult Herit 13(2):152–174Google Scholar
  3. Bastian M, Buchanan A, Downie F, Hale A, Moore N, Speed F (2014) Memories of Mr Seel’s Garden: engaging with historic and future food systems in Liverpool. http://www.mrseelsgarden.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/CC-Discussion-Paper-Mr-Seels-Garden.pdf. Accessed 04 April 2015
  4. Baxter G, Johnson I, Williams D (2002) Impact evaluation of museums, archives and libraries: available evidence project. Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen. http://www4.rgu.ac.uk/files/imreport.pdf
  5. Billen G, Barles S, Chatzimpiros P, Garnier J (2012) Grain, meat and vegetables to feed Paris: where did and do they come from? Localising Paris food supply areas from the eighteenth to the twenty-first century. Reg Environ Change 12(2):325–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bramall R (2011) Dig for victory! Anti-consumerism, austerity and new historical subjectivities. Subjectivity 4(1):68–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buchanan A (2011) Strangely unfamiliar: ideas of the archive from outside the discipline. In: Hill J (ed) The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader. Facet, London, pp 37–62Google Scholar
  8. Carolan M (2011) Embodied food politics. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  9. Chappell M, LaValle L (2011) Food security and biodiversity: can we have both? An agroecological analysis. Agric Hum Values 28:3–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conway P (1986) Facts and Frameworks: An Approach to Studying the Users of Archives. American Archivist 49(4):393–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cvetkovich A (2003) An archive of feelings: trauma, sexuality, and lesbian public cultures. Duke University Press, DurhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daniels M, Yakel E (2013) Uncovering impact: the influence of archives on student learning. J Acad Librariansh 39(5):414–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Figueiredo P (2011) Liverpool Waters heritage impact assessment. Assessment of potential effects on the Liverpool World Heritage Site. Peel Holdings, no place of publication Google Scholar
  14. DeLind LB (2006) Of bodies, place, and culture: re-situating local food. J Agric Environ Ethics 19:121–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeLind LB, Bingen J (2008) Place and civic culture: re-thinking the context for local agriculture. J Agric Environ Ethics 21:127–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duff WM, Cherry JM (2008) Archival orientation for undergraduate students: an exploratory study of impact. Am Arch 71(2):499–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duff WM, Johnson CA (2002) Accidentally found on purpose: information-seeking behavior of historians in archives. Libr Q 72(4):472–496Google Scholar
  18. Duff WM, Monks-Leeson E, Galey A (2012) Contexts built and found: a pilot study on the process of archival meaning-making. Arch Sci 12(1):69–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goodwin J, Jasper JM, Polletta F (eds) (2001) Passionate politics: emotions and social movements. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  20. Guitart D, Pickering C et al (2012) Past results and future directions in urban community gardens research. Urban For Urban Green 11(4):364–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hegnes AW (2007) Understanding the temporal ambiguity of local foods through “polytemporality”: the case of Norwegian gamalost fra vik (old cheese). Anthropology of food S2 http://aof.revues.org/458
  22. Heldke L (2006) The unexamined meal is not worth eating, or why and how philosophers (might/could) study food. Food Cult Soc 9:201–219Google Scholar
  23. Holtzman JD (2006) Food and memory. Annu Rev Anthropol 35:361–378 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hopkins R (2008) The transition handbook: from oil dependency to local resilience. Green Books, TotnesGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaplan DM (2012) The philosophy of food. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  26. Kierans C, Haeney J (2010) The ‘Social Life’ of Scouse: Understanding Contemporary Liverpool through Changing Food Practices. Cult Sociol 4(1):101–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krause MG (2010a) Undergraduates in the archives: using an assessment rubric to measure learning. Am Arch 73(2):507–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Krause MG (2010b) “It makes history alive for them”: the role of archivists and special collections librarians in instructing undergraduates. J Acad Librariansh 36(5):401–411  CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee PJ (2005) Putting Principles into Practice: Understanding History. In: Donovan MS, Bransford JD (eds) How Students Learn: History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom. National Academies Press, Washington, DC pp 31–71Google Scholar
  30. Leinhardt G, Stainton C, Virji SM, Odoroff E (1994) Learning to reason in history: mindlessness to mindfulness. In: Carretero M, Voss JF (eds) Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 135–158Google Scholar
  31. Linkman A (1981) The Manchester studies archive retrieval project. J Soc Arch 6(7):414–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Linkman A, Williams B (1979) Recovering the people’s past: the archive rescue programme of Manchester studies. Hist Workshop J 8(1):111–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lowenthal D (2004) Dilemmas and delights of learning history. In: Stearns PN, Seixas P, Wineburg S (eds) Learning history: national and international perspectives. New York University Press, New York, pp 63–82Google Scholar
  34. McCoy M (2010) The manuscript as question: teaching primary sources in the archives—the China Missions Project. Coll Res Libr 71(1):49–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Msallem S (2012) Tales from the archive: how do food researchers from different disciplines use archives. British Library: Social Science Blog. http://britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/socialscience/2012/12/tales-from-the-archive-how-do-food-researchers-from-different-disciplines-use-archives.html. Accessed 16 June 2014
  36. Museums, Libraries and Archives Council (2008) Inspiring learning for all. http://www.inspiringlearningforall.gov.uk/toolstemplates/. Accessed 16 June 2014
  37. National Archives and Records Administration (2012) What’s cooking Uncle Sam? Exhibition. http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/whats-cooking/. Accessed 16 June 2014
  38. Noon R (n.d.) Love Lane lives. http://www.lovelanelives.com/. Accessed 16 June 2014
  39. Mr Seel’s Garden. http://www.mrseelsgarden.org Accessed 04 April 2015
  40. Parkins W (2004) Out of time: fast subjects and slow living. Time Soc 13:363–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rockenbach B (2011) Archives, undergraduates, and inquiry-based learning: case studies from Yale University Library. Am Arch 74(1):297–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rosa A, Blanco F, Huertas JA (1998) Uses of historical knowledge: an exploration of the construction of professional identity in students of psychology. In: Carretero M, Voss JF (eds) Learning and reasoning in history. Woburn Press, London, pp 61–78Google Scholar
  43. Schellenberg T (1956) Modern archives. Principles and techniques. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  44. Schneider M (1997) Tempo diet: a consideration of food and the quality of life. Time Soc 6:85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scottish Council on Archives (2011) The edible archive. http://www.scottisharchives.org.uk/discover/awareness/ediblearchive. Accessed 16 June 2014
  46. Seixas P (1996) Conceptualizing the growth of historical understanding. In: Olson DR, Torrance N (eds) The handbook of education and human development. New models of learning, teaching and schooling. Blackwell, Cambridge, pp 765–783Google Scholar
  47. Seixas P (2004) Theorizing historical consciousness. University of Toronto Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  48. Shepherd E, Yeo G (2003) Managing records: a handbook of principles and practice. Facet, LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. State Records Western Australia (2011) “Eating the archives” exhibition http://www.sro.wa.gov.au/eta/. Accessed 04 April 2015
  50. Stevens M, Flinn A, Shepherd E (2010) New frameworks for community engagement in the archive sector: from handing over to handing on. Int J Herit Stud 16(1–2):59–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sutton DE (2001) Remembrance of repasts: an anthropology of food and memory. Berg, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  52. Toms EG, Duff W (2002) “I spent 1 ½ hours sifting through one large box…”: diaries as information behavior of the archives user: lessons learned. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 53(14):1232–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Turner B (2011) Embodied connections: sustainability, food systems and community gardens. Local Environ 16:509–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. van Drie J, van Boxtel C (2008) Historical reasoning: towards a framework for analyzing students reasoning about the past. Educ Psychol Rev 20(2):87–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. von Borries B (1997) Concepts of historical thinking and historical learning in the perspective of German students and teachers. Int J Educ Res 27(3):211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Williams DA, Wavell C, Baxter G, MacLennan A, Jobson D (2005) Implementing impact evaluation in professional practice: a study of support needs within the museum, archive and library sector. Int J Inf Manag 25(6):533–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilschut A (2010) A forgotten key concept? Time in teaching and learning history. In: Paper presented at the 21st international congress of historical sciences, Amsterdam, 25 August 2010. www.academia.edu. Accessed 01 June 2014
  58. Wineburg SS (1991) Historical problem solving: a study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. J Educ Psychol 83(1):73–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wineburg SS (2001) Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: charting the future of teaching the past. Temple, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  60. Yakel E (2004) Information literacy for primary sources: creating a new paradigm for archival researcher education. OCLC Syst Serv 20(2):61–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yakel E, Torres DA (2003) AI: archival intelligence and user expertise. Am Arch 66(1):51–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yee S (2007) The Archive. In: Turkle S (ed) Evocative Objects: Things We Think With. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA and London pp 30–36Google Scholar
  63. Yeo G (2005) Understanding users and use: a market segmentation approach. J Soc Arch 26(1):25–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zinn H (1977) Secrecy, archives and the public interest. Midwest Arch 2(2):14–26MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of HistoryUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.Edinburgh School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, Edinburgh College of Art University of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations