Archival Science

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 191–216 | Cite as

Digital curation and quality standards for memory institutions: PREFORMA research project

  • Antonella Fresa
  • Börje Justrell
  • Claudio Prandoni
Original Paper


Memory institutions are facing increasing transfers of electronic documents and other media content for long-term preservation. Preservation models are often inspired by standards, such as the Open Archival Information System reference model, where transfers and preservation are built on information packages containing both data and metadata. Data are normally stored in specific file formats for documents, images, sound, video, etc., that are produced by software from different vendors. Even if the transferred files are in standard formats, the implementation of standards cannot be guaranteed and results may be different depending on the software used. The software implementing standards for the production of the electronic files are not controlled either by the institutions that produce them or by the memory institutions. Conformance tests of transfers are done, but their results cannot be further processed by the memory institution autonomously, unless it contacts the same provider of the conformance test again. This poses problems in curation and preservation. Data objects meant for preservation, passing through an uncontrolled generative process, can jeopardise the whole preservation exercise. The overall intention of PREFORMA project (PREservation FORMAts for culture information/e-archives) is to research critical factors in the quality of standard implementation in order to establish a long-term sustainable ecosystem around a range of practical tools, together with a variety of stakeholder groups. The tools should be innovative and provide a reference implementation of the most common file format standards for the assessment of the collections to be archived and for the correction of the digital archive. PREFORMA will target a wide digital curation and preservation community, by providing specifications and feedback to developers, standard bodies and memory institutions.


Standard file formats Digital cultural heritage Open source Long-term sustainable digital ecosystem Joint procurement Conformance tests 


  1. Archivematica. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  2. Alliance for Permanent Access to the Records of Science in Europe Network (APARSEN) Network of excellence. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  3. Aydinonat B, Barbera R, Fernandez S, Fresa A, Khoury A, Kollias S, Ozluk HK, López M, Messina M, Piccininno M, Tomassini S, Zakrajsek F (2011) Case study report—long term preservation. INDICATE project. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  4. Consultative Committee on Space Data Systems (CCSDS) (2004) Recommendation for a producer—archive interface methodology abstract standard (PAIMAS), CCSDS 651.0-B-1. Blue book. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  5. Consultative Committee on Space Data Systems (CCSDS) (2012a) Producer archive interface specification (PAIS). Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  6. Consultative Committee on Space Data Systems (CCSDS) (2012b) Reference model for an open archival information system (OAIS) 650.0-M-2 Magenta book. Issue 2, June 2012: 38. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  7. Cultural, artistic and scientific knowledge for preservation, access and retrieval (CASPAR). Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  8. DELOS (Network of Excellence on Digital Libraries). Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  9. Devenport T (2014) Engagement with commercial publishers. DCH-RP deliverable D4.2. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  10. Digital Cultural heritage NETwork (DC-NET). Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  11. Digital Cultural Heritage Roadmap for Preservation (DCH-RP). Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  12. Digital Curation Centre. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  13. Digital Curation Centre. Digital curation lifecycle model. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  14. Digital Preservation Europe. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  15. Distributed Information Retrieval Evaluation Campaign Tool (DIRECT). Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  16. Dobreva M, Ruusalepp R (2012) Digital preservation: interoperability ad modum. In: Chowdhury GG, Foo S (eds) Digital libraries and information access: research perspectives. Facet, London, pp 193–215Google Scholar
  17. Electronic Resource Preservation and Access Network (ERPANET). Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  18. Elfner P, Justrell B (2014) Overall roadmap. PREFORMA deliverable D2.1. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  19. Federal Agencies Digitization Guidelines Initiative (FADGI) (2012) FADGI application specification AS-AP (rev 1.k) MXF archive and preservation format October 5, 2012. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  20. Giaretta D (2011) Advanced digital preservation. Springer, Berlin. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  21. International Network for a Digital Cultural Heritage E-infrastructure (INDICATE). Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  22. ISO 14721 (2012) Space data and information transfer systems—open archival information system (OAIS)—reference model. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  23. JHOVE2. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  24. Justrell B, Toller E (2013) Standards and interoperability best practice report. DCH-RP project. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  25. Kejser UB, Nielsen AB, Thirifays A (2011) Costs of digital preservation project. Report for phase 2.—ingest-and-archival-storage. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  26. Lemmens B, Elfner P, Lundell B, Prandoni C (2014) Tender specifications. PREFORMA deliverable D2.2. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  27. McKenna G, De Loof C (2009) Report on existing standards applied by European museums. ATHENA project. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  28. McKenna G, Stein R (2011) Best practice report on cultural heritage linked data and metadata standards. Linked heritage project. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  29. Open Planets Foundation. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  30. Open Source Initiative, Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  31. Palaiologk AS, Economides AA, Tjalsma HD, Sesink LB (2012) An activity-based costing model for long-term preservation and dissemination of digital research data: the case of DANS. International journal on digital libraries, 12(4):195–214. doi: 10.1007/s00799-012-0092-1. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  32. Participative Research labOratory for Multimedia and Multilingual Information Systems Evaluation (PROMISE). Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  33. Permanent Access to the Records of Science in Europe PARSE-insight. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  34. Poole N (2010) The cost of digitising Europe’s cultural heritage. A report for the Comité des Sages of the European Commission. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  35. PrestoPRIME. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  36. Preservation and Long-term Access through NETworked Services (PLANETS). Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  37. Preservation Technology for European Archives (PRESTO). Accessed 21 Jan 2015
  38. Preservation Towards Storage and Access. Standardised practices for audiovisual contents in Europe (PrestoSpace). Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  39. Riding the wave—how Europe can gain from the rising tide of scientific data (2010) Final report of the high level expert group on scientific data. A submission to the European Commission—European Union. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  40. Ruusalepp R, Dobreva M (2011) Digital preservation services: state of the art analysis. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  41. Scalable Preservation Environments (SCAPE). Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  42. Smyth Z (2006) Developing a pre-ingest strategy for digital records, presentation at the joint DCC/LUCAS workshop, 30.11-1.12.2006. Foresight Centre, LiverpoolGoogle Scholar
  43. Strodl S, Petrov P, Rauber A (2011) Research on digital preservation within projects co-funded by the European Union in the ICT programme. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
  44. Stroeker N, Panteia RV (2012) ENUMERATE survey report on digitisation in European cultural heritage institutions 2012. Accessed 12 Jan 2015

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonella Fresa
    • 1
  • Börje Justrell
    • 2
  • Claudio Prandoni
    • 1
  1. 1.Promoter SrlPeccioliItaly
  2. 2.RiksarkivetStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations