Archival Science

, Volume 14, Issue 3–4, pp 365–380 | Cite as

Insurgent citizens: the manufacture of police records in post-Katrina New Orleans and its implications for human rights

Original Paper

Abstract

Inquiries into allegations of human rights abuses require a reliable corpus of evidence to proceed and hold violators accountable for their actions. The following article analyzes the 2005 police shootings that occurred on New Orleans’ Danziger Bridge in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, a case that illustrates the challenges confronting investigations into human rights violations in the USA. By examining an investigative police report, two survivors’ civil complaints, and federal court filings, the article argues that the methodical nature in which several police officers in post-Katrina New Orleans conspired to document the use of deadly force against several unarmed citizens demonstrates that police records created in the context of officer-involved shootings inhibit accountability processes as much as they facilitate them. The deliberate creation of such records, the article concludes, impairs the ability of a democratic nation to ensure human rights and bring their violators to account.

Keywords

Evidence Use of deadly force Accountability USA Human rights 

References

  1. Allen-Bell AA (2010) Bridge over troubled waters and passageway on a journey to justice: national lessons learned about justice from Louisiana’s response to Hurricane Katrina. Cal WL Rev 46(2):241–303Google Scholar
  2. Belur J (2010) Permission to shoot?: police use of deadly force in democracies. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bickford L (1999) The archival imperative: human rights and historical memory in Latin America’s Southern Cone. Hum Rights Q 21(4):1097–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bobb MJ (2011) The Los Angeles County Sherriff’s Department, 30th semiannual report. Police Assessment Resource Center. http://www.parc.info/client_files/LASD/30th%20Semi-annual%20Report.pdf. Accessed 8 Mar
  5. Brothman B (2002) Afterglow: conceptions of record and evidence in archival discourse. Arch Sci 2(3–4):311–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cambell WC (2010) Getting it wrong: ten of the greatest misreported stories in American journalism. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  7. Caswell M (2010) Khmer rouge archives: accountability, truth, and memory in Cambodia. Arch Sci 1:25–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Center for the Study of Human Rights (2005) 25 + human rights documents, 2005 edition. Columbia University Center for the Study of Human Rights. http://hrcolumbia.org/publications/25+_human_rights_documents.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2014
  9. Cogan JK (2000) The problem of obtaining evidence for international criminal courts. Hum Rights Q 2:404–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cook T (2013) Evidence, memory, identity, and community: four shifting archival paradigms. Arch Sci 13(2–3):95–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crawshaw R, Devlin B, Williamson T (1998) Human rights and policing: standards for good behavior and a strategy for change. Kluwer Law International, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  12. Duranti L, Rogers C, Sheppard A (2010) Electronic records and the law of evidence in Canada: the uniform electronic evidence act twelve years later. Archivaria 70:95–124Google Scholar
  13. Fyfe JJ (1999) Police use of deadly force: research and reform. In: Gaines LK, Cordner GW (eds) Policing perspectives: an anthology. Roxbury Publishing Company, Los Angeles, pp 408–434Google Scholar
  14. Gregg AM (2006) Shoot to kill-how far is too far in protecting citizens?: a comparative discussion of the shoot-to-kill orders given in London after the subway bombings and those given in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Penn St Int’l L Rev 25:295–315Google Scholar
  15. Gregory S (2010) Cameras everywhere: ubiquitous video documentation of human rights, new forms of video advocacy, and considerations of safety, security, dignity and consent. J Hum Rights Pract 2(2):191–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harris V (2000) Law, evidence and electronic records: strategic perspective from the global periphery. S Afr Arch J 41:3–19Google Scholar
  17. Harris V (2002a) The archival sliver: power, memory, and archives in South Africa. Arch Sci 2(1–2):63–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harris V (2002b) They should have destroyed more: the destruction of public records by the South African State in the final years of apartheid, 1990–1994. In: Cox RJ, Wallace DA (eds) Archives and the public good: accountability and records in modern society. Quorum Books, Westport, pp 205–228Google Scholar
  19. Hertel G, Kerr NL (2001) Priming in-group favoritism: the impact of normative scripts in the minimal group paradigm. J Exp Soc Psych 37:316–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holmes v. City of New Orleans et al (2006) No. 2-06-CV-05695-JTM-SS, R. Doc. 1 Complaint (E.D. Louisiana, 1 September 2006)Google Scholar
  21. Hurley C (2002) Records and the public interest: the Heiner Affair in Queensland, Australia. In: Cox RJ, Wallace DA (eds) Archives and the public good: accountability and records in modern society. Quorum Books, Westport, pp 293–318Google Scholar
  22. Klinger D (2004) Into the kill zone: a cop’s eye view of deadly force. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee C (2004) But I thought he had a gun: race and police use of deadly force. Hastings Race Poverty LJ 2:1–51Google Scholar
  24. Madison v. City of New Orleans et al (2006) No. 2-06-CV-05701-JTM-SS, R. Doc. 1 Complaint (E.D. Louisiana, September 1, 2006)Google Scholar
  25. Meehan J (2006) Towards an archival concept of evidence. Archivaria 61:127–146Google Scholar
  26. Meijer AJ (2003) Trust this document! ICTs, authentic records and accountability. Arch Sci 3(3):275–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Montgomery BP (2004) Fact-finding by human rights non-governmental organizations: challenges, strategies, and the shaping of archival evidence. Archivaria 58:21–50Google Scholar
  28. Morrison GB (2010) Deadly force in the United States. In: Kuhns JB, Knutsson J (eds) Police use of force: a global perspective. Praeger, Santa Barbara, pp 132–140Google Scholar
  29. National Institute of Justice (1999) Use of force by police: overview of national and local data. US Department of Justice. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/176330-1.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2014
  30. Neier A (2012) The international human rights movement: a history. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  31. New Orleans Police Department (2006) Attempted murder of a police officer. ProPublica. http://www.propublica.org/documents/item/nopd-report-on-the-danziger-bridge-shooting. Accessed 27 Feb 2014
  32. Nowak M (2009) Fact-finding on torture and ill-treatment and conditions of detention. J Hum Rights Pract 1(1):101–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Orentlicher DF (1990) Bearing witness: the art and science of human rights fact-finding. Harv Hum Rights J 3:83–135Google Scholar
  34. Orentlicher D (2005) Updated set of principles for the protection and promotion of human rights through action to combat impunity (UN Doc. E/CN.4/2005/102/Add. 1 Feb. 8, 2005). United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Perez TE (2011) Re: investigation of the New Orleans Police Department, New Orleans, Louisiana. US Department of Justice. http://www.justice.gov/crt/about/spl/nopd_letter.pdf. Accessed 7 Mar 2014
  36. Piasecki SJ (1995) Legal admissibility of electronic records as evidence and implications for records management. Am Arch 58(1):54–64Google Scholar
  37. Project Stolen Lives (1999) Stolen lives: killed by law enforcement second edition. Stolen Lives Project, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Punch M (2011) Shoot to kill: police accountability, firearms and fatal force. Policy Press, BristolGoogle Scholar
  39. Quigley WP (2007) Thirteen ways of looking at Katrina: human and civil rights left behind again. Tul L Rev 81(4):955–1017Google Scholar
  40. Ratner SR, Abrams JS, Bischoff JL (2009) Accountability for human rights atrocities in international law: beyond the Nuremberg Legacy third edition. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  41. Roberts-Moore J (2002) Establishing recognition of past injustices: uses of archival records in documenting the experience of Japanese Canadians during the Second World War. Archivaria 53:64–75Google Scholar
  42. Rojek J, Alpert GP, Smith HP (2012) Examining officer and citizen accounts of police use of force incidents. Crime Delinq 58(2):301–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Slack KM (1996) Operation Condor and human rights: a report from Paraguay’s archive of terror. Hum Rights Q 18(2):492–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sun IY (2011) Use of deadly force. In: Chambliss WJ (ed) Police and law enforcement. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tierney K, Bevc C, Kuligowski E (2006) Metaphors matter: disaster myths, media frames, and their consequences in Hurricane Katrina. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 604:57–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. United States Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division (2011) Investigation of the New Orleans Police Department. US Department of Justice. http://www.justice.gov/crt/about/spl/nopd_report.pdf Accessed 7 Mar 2014
  47. United States of America v. Bowen et al (2010) No. 2-10-CR-00204-KDE-SS, R. Doc. 1 Indictment (E.D. Louisiana, 12 July 2010)Google Scholar
  48. United States of America v. Bowen et al (2011) No. 2-10-CR-00204-KDE-SS, R. Doc. 566-6 Admitted Trial Exhibits, R. Doc. 566-8 Verdict Form (E.D. Louisiana, 5 Aug 2011)Google Scholar
  49. United States of America v. Bowen et al (2012) No. 2-10-CR-00204-KDE-SS, Lexis 50670 Opinion (E.D. Louisiana, 11 April 2012)Google Scholar
  50. United States of America v. City of New Orleans (2012) No. 2-12-CV-01924-SM-JCW, R. Doc. 1 Complaint (E.D. Louisiana, 24 July 2012)Google Scholar
  51. United States of America v. City of New Orleans (2013) No. 2-12-CV-01924-SM-JCW, R. Doc. 159-1 Consent decree regarding the New Orleans Police Department (E.D. Louisiana, 11 Jan 2013)Google Scholar
  52. United States of America v. Lohman (2010) No. 2-10-CR-00032-ILRL-ALC, R. Doc. 18 Factual Basis (E.D. Louisiana, 24 Feb 2010)Google Scholar
  53. Van Maanen J, Pentland BT (1994) Cops and auditors: the rhetoric of records. In: Sitkin SB, Bies RJ (eds) The legalistic organization. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 53–90Google Scholar
  54. Vorhees CCW, Vick J, Perkins DD (2007) Came hell and high water: the intersection of Hurricane Katrina, the news media, race and poverty. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 17(6):415–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Walshe S (2013) The sad death of Kimani Gray and society’s bad choices. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/mar/27/sad-death-kimani-gray-society-bad-choices. Accessed 10 Mar 2014

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Seeley G. Mudd Manuscript LibraryPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations