Advertisement

Archival Science

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 95–124 | Cite as

Personal documentation on a social network site: Facebook, a collection of moments from your life?

  • Donghee SinnEmail author
  • Sue Yeon Syn
Original Paper

Abstract

Social networking on the Web has become very popular in recent years. Used by more than 950 million people worldwide, Facebook is one of the most popular of these services. One interesting aspect of Facebook is that users can converse through various formats, including wall posts, photographs, Web links, music, and video clips of stories and interests surrounding their daily lives. This phenomenon raises an important question for archivists in regard to personal history on the Web: What are the new ways that contemporary people document their life stories? This study looks at Facebook activities from the perspectives of personal documentation. Using an online survey, this study investigates how Facebook content presents users themselves and their everyday stories, whether they perceive their activities of using Facebook as personal documentation, and what factors influence such activities. The findings of this study show the current status of Facebook usage. Facebook content indeed indicates information of self-presentation and personal documentation of everyday lives of users. Attitudes about and activeness on Facebook are the major factors that influence self-presentation and personal documentation activities on Facebook. Generic external factors, such as personal archiving in general, do not show strong associations with personal documentation activities as factors. Based on this understanding, we discuss the roles of information professionals and cultural heritage institutions in dealing with a new type of personal record on the Web.

Keywords

Facebook Social network sites Personal documentation Self-presentation Personal digital archiving Factors for personal documentation 

References

  1. Acquisti A, Gross R (2006) Imagined communities: awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. Priv Enhanc Technol 4258(2006):36–58. doi: 10.1007/11957454_3 (Lecture notes in computer science)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aharony N (2012) Facebook use in libraries: an exploratory analysis. Aslib Proc 64(4):358–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aluri A (2011) To investigate the usage of social networking sites as a career enhancement tool among generation y: an empirical research. In: Hsu CH, Li M (eds) The 16th annual graduate student research conference in hospitality and tourism, January 2011 Houston, TX, pp 6–8. http://scholarworks.umass.edu/gradconf_hospitality/2011/Poster/21/. Accessed 21 Dec 2012
  4. Becker D, Nogues C (2012) Saving-over, over-saving, and the future mess of writers’ digital archives: a survey report on the personal digital archiving practices of emerging writers. Am Arch 75(2):482–513Google Scholar
  5. Bohannon J (2011) Social science for pennies. Science 334:307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. boyd DM, Ellison NB (2008) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J Comput Mediat Commun 13:210–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bumgarner BA (2007) You have been poked: exploring the uses and gratifications of Facebook among emerging adults. First Monday 12(11) http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2026/1897. Accessed 21 Dec 2012
  8. Burke M, Kraut R, Marlow C (2011) Social capital on Facebook: differentiating uses and users. In: Tan D, Fitzpatrick G, Gutwin C, Begole B, Kellogg WE (eds) Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems Vancouver, Canada. ACM, New York, pp 571–580Google Scholar
  9. Cheshire C, Antin J, Churchill E (2010) Behaviors, adverse events, and dispositions: an empirical study of online discretion and information control. JASIST 61(7):1487–1501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christofides E, Muise A, Desmarais S (2009) Information disclosure and control on Facebook: are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes? CyberPsychol Behav 12(3):341–345. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. comScore (2012) comScore media matrix ranks top 50 U.S. Web properties for May 2012 http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2012/6/comScore_Media_Metrix_Ranks_Top_50_U.S._Web_Properties_for_May_2012. Accessed 9 Dec 2012
  12. Conti G, Sobiesk E (2007) An honest man has nothing to fear: user perceptions on Web-based information disclosure. In: Cranor LF (ed.) Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on usable privacy and security, 18–20 July 2007, Pittsburgh, PA. ACM, New York, pp 112–121. doi: 10.1145/1280680.1280695
  13. Cox RJ (2009) Personal archives and a new archival calling: readings, reflections and ruminations. LitWin Books, Duluth, MNGoogle Scholar
  14. Dimicco JM, Millen DR (2007) Identity management: multiple presentations of self in Facebook. In: Gross T, Inkpen K (eds) Proceedings of the GROUP’07, international ACM Conference On Supporting Group Work, 4–7 Nov 2007. Sanibel Island, Florida. ACM, New York, pp 383–386. doi: 10.1145/1316624.1316682
  15. Donath J, Boyd D (2004) Public displays of connection. BT Technol J 22(4):71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dwyer C (2007) Digital relationships in the MySpace generation: results from a qualitative study. Presented at the 40th annual Hawaii international conference on systems sciences (HICSS’07), IEEE Computer Society Press http://support.csis.pace.edu/CSISWeb/docs/techReports/techReport235.pdf. Accessed 21 Dec 2012
  17. Dwyer C, Hiltz S, Passerini K (2007) Trust and privacy concern within social networking sites: a comparison of Facebook and MySpace. In: Hoxmeier JA, Hayne S (eds) Proceedings of the 13th American conference on information systems (AMCIS), 9–12 Aug 2007, Keystone, Colorado. Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, GA, p. 339Google Scholar
  18. Ebersole S (2000) Uses and gratifications of the Web among students. J Comput Mediat Commun 6(1). doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00111.x
  19. Efron M (2011) Information search and retrieval in microblogs. JASIST 62(6):996–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ellison NB, Steinfield C, Lampe C (2007) The benefits of Facebook “friends:” social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. J Comput Mediat Commun 12:1143–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ellison NB, Steinfield C, Lampe C (2011) Connection strategies: social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media Soc 13(6):873–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Facebook (2012) Key facts http://newsroom.fb.com/content/default.aspx?NewsAreaId=22. Accessed 26 Dec 2012
  23. Garde-Hansen J (2009) My memories? Personal digital archive fever and Facebook. In: Garde-Hansen J, Hoskins A, Reading A (eds) Save as … digital memories. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 135–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Giannakos MN, Giotopoulos KK, Chorianopoulos K (2010) In the Face (book) of the daily routine. In: Lugmayr A, Franssila H, Sotamaa O, Safran C, Aaltonen T (eds) Proceedings of the 14th international academic MindTrek conference: envisioning future media environments, 6–8 Oct 2010. Tampere, Finland. ACM, New York, pp 153–157. doi: 10.1145/1930488.1930521
  25. Golder S, Wilkerson D, Huberman B (2007) Rhythms of social interaction: Messaging within a massive online network. In: Steinfield C, Pentland B, Ackerman M, Contractor N (eds) Proceedings of communication and technology conference. Springer, London, pp 41–66. doi: 10.1007/978-1-84628-905-7_3
  26. Goodman JK, Cryder CE, Cheema A (2012) Data collection in a flat world: the strengths and weaknesses of mechanical turk samples. J Behav Decis Mak. doi: 10.1002/bdm.1753 Google Scholar
  27. Gross R, Acquisti A (2005) Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. In: De Capitani di Vimercati S, Dingledine R (eds) Proceedings of ACM 2005 workshop on privacy in electronic society, Alexandria, Virginia, USA. ACM, New York, pp 71–80. doi: 10.1145/1102199.1102214
  28. Hendrix D, Chiarella D, Hasman L, Murphy S (2009) Use of Facebook in academic health sciences libraries. J Med Libr Assoc 97(1):43–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ipeirotis PG, Provost F, Wang J (2010) Quality management on Amazon mechanical Turk. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD workshop on human computation. ACM, New York. pp 64–67. doi: 10.1145/1837885.1837906
  30. Jacobson TB (2011) Facebook as a library tool: perceived vs. actual use. Coll Res Libr 72(1):79–90Google Scholar
  31. Jansen BJ, Sobel K, Cook G (2011) Classifying ecommerce information sharing behavior by youths on social networking sites. J Inf Sci 37(2):120–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Joinson AN (2008) “Looking at”, “looking up”, or “keeping up with” people? Motives and uses of Facebook. In: Czerwinski M, Lund A (eds) Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 5–10 April 2008, Florence, Italy. ACM, New York, pp 1027–1036. doi: 10.1145/1357054.1357213
  33. Jones W (2007) Personal information management. Annu Rev Inf Sci Tech 41(1):453–504. doi: 10.1002/aris.2007.1440410117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kelly M, Northern C, Eldeen HS, Nelson M, McCown F (n.d.) ArchiveFacebook. Mozillar Add-Ons https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/archivefacebook/. Accessed 26 Dec 2012
  35. Kemp E (2010) Is Facebook the end of the yearbook? In: Chan V, Ferguson C, Fraser F, Geissler C, Metten AM, Smith S (eds) The book of MPub: new perspectives on technology and publishing. CCSP Press, Vancouver, pp 143–150Google Scholar
  36. Kluemper DH, Rosen PA (2009) Future employment selection methods: evaluating social networking web sites. J Manag Psychol 24(6):567–580. doi: 10.1108/02683940910974134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lampe C, Ellison NB, Steinfield C (2006) A Face(book) in the crowd: social searching vs. social browsing. In: Hinds P, Martin D (eds) Proceedings of ACM specfic interest group on computer-supported cooperative work, 4–8 Nov 2006, Banff, Alberta, Canada. ACM, New York, pp 167–170. doi: 10.1145/1180875.1180901
  38. Lampe C, Ellison NB, Steinfield C (2007) A familiar Face (book): profile elements as singles in an online social network. In: Proceedings of CHI 2007: online representation of self, San Jose, CA. ACM, New York, pp 435–444Google Scholar
  39. Lampe C, Ellison NB, Steinfield C (2008) Changes in use and perception of Facebook. In: Begole B, McDonald DW (eds) Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, 8–12 Nov 2008, San Diego, California. ACM, New York, pp 721–730. doi: 10.1145/1460563.1460675
  40. Lee CA (2011) I, Digital. Society of American Archivists, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  41. Lenhart A, Madden M (2007) Teens, privacy and online social networks: how teens manage their online identities and personal information in the age of MySpace. Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC. Accessed 21 Dec 2012 at http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2007/Teens-Privacy-and-Online-Social-Networks.aspx
  42. Leung L, Wei R (2000) More than just talk on the move: uses and gratifications on the cellular phone. J Mass Commun Q 77(2):308–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marshall CC (2011) Challenges and opportunities for personal digital archiving. In: Lee CA (ed) I, Digital. Society of American Archivists, Chicago, pp 90–114Google Scholar
  44. Marshall C., Bly S, Brun-Cottan F (2006) The long term fate of our personal digital belongings: toward a service model for personal archives. In: Proceedings of archiving 2006: final program and proc, 23–26 May 2006. Ottawa, Canada. Society for Imaging Science and Technology, Springfield, VA, pp 25–30Google Scholar
  45. Mason W, Suri S (2012) Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behav Res Methods 44(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McCarthy C (2009, 12) Facebook database outage cutt off about 150,000. CNET News http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-10373349-36.html. Accessed 26 Dec 2012
  47. McCown F, Nelson ML (2009) What happens when Facebook is gone? In: Heath F, Richard F (eds) Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries, 14–19 June 2009, Austin, Texas. ACM, New York, pp 251–254. doi: 10.1145/1555400.1555440
  48. Nicholson S (2011) InfoGraphic: the history of online social networking. Socialmedia Today. http://socialmediatoday.com/socmedsean/286629/infographic-history-online-social-networking. Accessed 2 Jul 2013
  49. Nosko A, Wood E, Molema S (2010) All about me: disclosure in online social networking profiles: the case of Facebook. Comput Human Behav 26:406–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. O’Sullivan C (2005) Diaries, on-line diaries, and the future loss to archives; or blogs and the blogging bloggers who blog them. Am Arch 68:53–73Google Scholar
  51. Paolacci G, Chandler J, Ipeirotis PG (2010) Running experiments on amazon mechanical Turk. Judgm Decis Mak 5(5):411–419Google Scholar
  52. Pempek TA, Yermolayeva YA, Calvert SL (2009) College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. J Appl Dev Psychol 30:227–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rauber A, Kaiser M, Wachter B (2008) Ethical issues in Web archive creation and usage—towards a research agenda. Presented at the 8th international web archiving workshop, Aarhus, Denmark. http://iwaw.europarchive.org/08/IWAW2008-Rauber.pdf. Accessed 26 Dec 2012
  54. Raymond M (2010, April 14) How Tweet it is!: Library acquires entire Twitter archive. Library of Congress Blog. http://blogs.loc.gov/loc/2010/04/how-tweet-it-is-library-acquires-entire-twitter-archive/. Accessed 26 Dec 2012
  55. Reading A (2009) Memobilia: the mobile phone and the emergence of wearable memories. In: Garde-Hansen J, Hoskins A, Reading A (eds) Save as … digital memories. Palgrave Macmillan, London, UK, pp 81–95Google Scholar
  56. Sachs DE, Eckel EJ, Langan KA (2011) Striking a balance: effective use of Facebook in an academic library. Internet Ref Serv Q 16(1/2):35–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sosik VS, Zhao X, Cosley D (2012) See friendship, sort of: how conversation and digital traces might support reflection on friendships. In Poltrock S, Simone C, Grudin J, Mark G, Riedl J (eds) Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work, Seatle, WA. ACM, New York, pp 1145–1154Google Scholar
  58. Toma CL (2010) Affirming the self through online profiles: beneficial effects of social networking sites. In: Fitzpatrick G, Hudson S, Edwards K, Rodden T (eds) Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 10–15 April 2010, Atlanta, Georgia. ACM, New York, pp 1749–1752. doi: 10.1145/1753326.1753588
  59. Tufekci Z (2008) Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. Bull Sci Technol Soc 28(1):20–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Warren M (2008, August 17). Facebook deleted my account—Find out why they could do the same to you. http://mattwarren.co/2008/08/facebook-deleted-my-account-they-could-do-the-same-to-you/. Accessed 26 Dec 2012
  61. Witek D, Grettano T (2012) Information literacy on Facebook: an analysis. Ref Serv Rev 40(2):242–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhao S, Grasmuck S, Martin J (2008) Identity construction on Facebook: digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Comput Hum Behav 24:1816–1836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhao X, Salehi N, Naranjit S, Alwaalan S, Voida S, Cosley D (2013) The many faces of Facebook: experiencing social media as performance, exhibition, and personal archive. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Paris, France. ACM, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information StudiesUniversity at Albany (State University of New York)AlbanyUSA
  2. 2.School of Library and Information ScienceCatholic University of AmericaWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations