Archival Science

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 287–318 | Cite as

Continuous classification: capturing dynamic relationships among information resources

Original Paper

Abstract

Records classification within electronic records management systems often is constrained by rules derived from paper-era recordkeeping, particularly the rule that one record can have only one file code—a rule that was developed to enable the management of records in aggregate. This paper calls for a transformation of recordkeeping and archival practice through an expanded definition of records classification and through item-level management of electronic records.

Keywords

Classification Item-level management Electronic records management systems Functionalism in archival theory Function-based records classification Digital records management Digital records discovery Digital archiving Digital information ecology 

References

  1. Alberts I, Schellinck J, Eby C, Marleau Y (2010) Bridging functions and processes for records management. Can J Inf Library Sci 34(4):365–390Google Scholar
  2. Atleo R (2004) Tsawalk: a Nuu-chah-nulth worldview. UBC Press, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey C (1997) From the top down: the practice of macro-appraisal. Archivaria 43:89–128Google Scholar
  4. Bailey C (2006) Turning macro-appraisal decisions into archival holdings: crafting function-based terms and conditions for the transfer of archival records. Archivaria 61:147–179Google Scholar
  5. Bailey S (2008) Managing the crowd: rethinking records management for the Web 2.0 world. Facet, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Bailey S (2009) Forget electronic records management, it’s automated records management that we desperately need. Rec Manag J 19(2):91–97Google Scholar
  7. Bailey S (2010) Human-computer interaction: the missing piece of the records management puzzle? Rec Manag J 20(3):279–290Google Scholar
  8. Bak G, Armstrong P (2008) Points of convergence: seamless long-term access to digital publications and archival records at library and archives Canada. Arch Sci 8(4):279–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bastian JA (2003) Owning memory: how a Caribbean community lost its archives and found its history. Libraries Unlimited, WestportGoogle Scholar
  10. Bearman D (1996) Item level control and electronic recordkeeping. Arch Mus Info 10(3):195–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beaven BPN (2005) ‘But am I getting my records?’ Squaring the circle with terms and conditions expressed in relation to function and activity. Arch Sci 5(2-4):315–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brin S, Page L (1998) The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. In: Seventh international World-Wide Web conference (WWW 1998), April 14–18, 1998, Brisbane, Australia. Accessed 26 Oct 2011 at: http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/361/
  13. Brothman B (1991) Orders of value: probing the theoretical terms of archival practice. Archivaria 32:78–100Google Scholar
  14. Brothman B (2006) Archives, life cycles, and death wishes: a helical model of record formation. Archivaria 61:235–269Google Scholar
  15. Canada. Department of Justice (2004) The Library and Archives of Canada Act. Accessed 13 Feb 2012 at: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/L-7.7/
  16. Canada. Government On-Line Metadata Working Group—Records Management Sub-Group (2006) Government of Canada records management application profile. GOL Metadata Working Group, Ottawa. Accessed 14 Oct 2011 at: http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/government/products-services/007002-5000-e.html
  17. Canada. Library and Archives Canada (2006) BASCS guidance. Library and Archives Canada, Gatineau. Accessed 3 Feb 2011 at: http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/government/products-services/007002-2089-e.html
  18. Canada. Library and Archives Canada (2012) Project naming and Canada’s North. Accessed 13 Feb 2012 at: www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/podcasts/index-e.html
  19. Canada. Treasury Board Secretariat (2010) Standard for electronic documents and records management solutions (EDRMS). Treasury Board Secretariat, Ottawa. Accessed 14 Oct 2011 at: http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pol/doc-eng.aspx?id=18910&section=text
  20. Christen K (2011) Opening archives: respectful repatriation. Am Arch 74(1):185–210Google Scholar
  21. Cook T (1992) The concept of the archival fonds in the post-custodial era: theory, problems and solutions. Archivaria 35:24–37Google Scholar
  22. Cook T (1997) What’s past is prologue: a history of archival ideas since 1898, and the future paradigm shift. Archivaria 43:17–63Google Scholar
  23. Cook T (2004) Macro-appraisal and functional analysis: documenting governance rather than government. J Soc Arch 25(1):5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cook T (2005) Macroappraisal in theory and practice: origins, characteristics and implementation in Canada, 1950–2000. Arch Sci 5(2-4):101–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cumming K (2011) Evolutionary taxonomy, records management and fish. In Future proof [blog]. New South Wales State Records Authority, Kingswood. Accessed 30 Sept 2011 at: http://futureproof.records.nsw.gov.au/evolutionary-taxonomy-records-management-and-fish/
  26. Cunningham A (2001) Six degrees of separation: Australian metadata initiatives and their relationships with international standards. Arch Sci 1(3):271–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Day RE (2001) The modern invention of information: discourse, history and power. Southern Illinois UP, CarbondaleGoogle Scholar
  28. Dotsika F (2009) Uniting formal and informal descriptive power: reconciling ontologies with folksonomies. Int J Inf Manag 29(5):407–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Duranti L (1997) The archival bond. Arch Mus Info 11:213–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Duranti L, Eastwood T, MacNeil H (2002) Preservation of the integrity of electronic records. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  31. Eastwood T (ed) (1992) The archival fonds: from theory to practice. Bureau of Canadian Archivists, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  32. Eastwood T (1994) What is archival theory and why is it important? Archivaria 37:122–130Google Scholar
  33. Evans J, McKemmish S, Reed B (2009) Making metadata matter: outcomes from the clever recordkeeping metadata project. Arch Manuscr 37(1):28–56Google Scholar
  34. Fisher GL (1973) Letting the archival dust settle: some remarks on the record group concept. J Soc Arch 4(8):640–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Foscarini F (2006) Records classification and functions: an archival perspective. Knowl Org 33(4):188–198Google Scholar
  36. Foscarini F (2009) Function-based records classification systems: an exploratory study of records management practices in central banks. PhD Thesis, University of British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  37. Google (2011) Technology overview. Google, Mountain View. Accessed 1 Oct 2011 at: http://www.google.com/corporate/tech.html
  38. Harris V (2000) Exploring archives: an introduction to archival ideas and practice in South Africa, 2nd edn. National Archives of South Africa, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  39. Hurley C (1993) What, if anything, is a function? Arch Manuscr 21(2):208–220Google Scholar
  40. Hurley C (1994) The Australian (series) system: an exposition. In: McKemmish S, Piggott M (eds) The records continuum: Ian Maclean and the Australian Archives first fifty years. Australian Archives, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  41. Hurley C (2005) Parallel provenance (if these are your records, where are your stories?). Web publication by author. Originally published in two parts: what, if anything, is archival description? Arch Manuscr 33(1) and When something is not related to everything else. Arch Manuscr 33(2). Accessed 1 Oct 2011 at: http://infotech.monash.edu/research/groups/rcrg/hurley.html
  42. ISO 15489-1 (2001) Information and documentation: records management. Part 1: generalGoogle Scholar
  43. Jenkinson H (1966) A manual of archive administration. Lund, Humphries & Co., LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Jenkinson H (1980) Selected writings of Sir Hilary Jenkinson. Sutton, GloucesterGoogle Scholar
  45. Ketelaar E (2001) Tacit narratives: the meanings of archives. Arch Sci 1(2):131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Knowlton SA (2005) Three decades since Prejudices and Antipathies: a study of changes in the library of congress subject headings. Cataloging Classif Q 40(2):123–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Krause MG, Yakel E (2007) Interaction in virtual archives: the polar bear expedition digital collections next generation finding aid. Am Arch 70(2):282–314Google Scholar
  48. Krawczyk B (1999) Cross reference heaven: the abandonment of the fonds as the primary level of arrangement for Ontario government records. Archivaria 48:131–153Google Scholar
  49. Kua E (2004) Non-western languages and literatures in the Dewey decimal classification scheme. Libri 54(4):256–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mai JE (2011) The modernity of classification. J Doc 67(4):710–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McKemmish S (1994) Are records ever actual? In: McKemmish S, Piggott M (eds) The records continuum: Ian Maclean and the Australian Archives first fifty years. Australian Archives, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  52. Merriam-Webster (2011) Merriam-Webster online. Merriam-Webster Incorporated, Springfield. Accessed 30 Sept 2011 at: http://www.merriam-webster.com/
  53. Miller T (2003) The German registry: the evolution of a recordkeeping model. Arch Sci 3(1):43–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nesmith T (2002) Seeing archives: postmodernism and the changing intellectual place of archives. Am Arch 65(1):24–41Google Scholar
  55. Nesmith T (2006) The concept of societal provenance and records of nineteenth-century Aboriginal-European relations in Western Canada: implications for archival theory and practice. Arch Sci 6(3–4):351–360Google Scholar
  56. Nesmith T (2008) Re-exploring the continuum, rediscovering archives. Arch Manuscr 36(2):34–53Google Scholar
  57. Noruzi A (2006) Folksonomies: (Un)controlled vocabulary? Knowl Org 33(4):199–203Google Scholar
  58. O’Reilly T (2005) What is Web 2.0? Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Accessed 13 Feb 2012 at: http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
  59. Orr SA (2005) Functions-based classification of records: is it functional? MA Thesis, Northumbria UniversityGoogle Scholar
  60. PageRank (2011) In: Wikipedia: the free encyclopedia. Accessed 30 Sept 2011 at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank
  61. Sabourin P (2001) Constructing a function-based records classification system: business activity structure classification system. Archivaria 51:137–154Google Scholar
  62. Schellenberg TR (1956) Modern archives: principles and techniques. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  63. Scott P (1966) The record group: a case for abandonment. Am Arch 29(4):493–504Google Scholar
  64. Scott P (1974) Facing the reality of administrative change: some further remarks on the record group concept. J Soc Arch 5(2):94–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shepherd E, Yeo G (2003) Managing records: a handbook of principles and practice. Facet, LondonGoogle Scholar
  66. Singh P, Klobas JE, Anderson K (2007) Information seeking behaviour of electronic records management systems (ERMS) users. HumanIT 9(1):135–181Google Scholar
  67. Smith C (1995) The Australian series system. Archivaria 40:86–93Google Scholar
  68. Upward F (1994) In search of the continuum: Ian Maclean’s ‘Australian experience’ essays on recordkeeping. In: McKemmish S, Piggott M (eds) The records continuum: Ian Maclean and the Australian Archives first fifty years. Australian Archives, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  69. Weinberger D (2007) Everything is miscellaneous: the power of the new digital disorder. Henry Holt, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  70. Yakel E (2003) Archival representation. Arch Sci 3(1):1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yakel E (2011a) Who represents the past? Archives, records, and the social Web. In: Cook T (ed) Controlling the past: documenting society and institutions. Society of American Archivists, Chicago, pp 257–278Google Scholar
  72. Yakel E (2011b) Balancing archival authority with encouraging authentic voices to engage with records. In: Theimer K (ed) A different kind of Web: new connections between archives and users. Society of American Archivists, Chicago, pp 75–101Google Scholar
  73. Yoon CK (2010) Naming nature: the clash between instinct and science. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  74. Zinkham H, Spring M (2011) Taking photographs to the people: the Flickr Commons project and the Library of Congress. In: Theimer K (ed) A different kind of Web: new connections between archives and users. Society of American Archivists, Chicago, pp 102–115Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Master’s of Archival Studies Program, Department of HistoryUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations