Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neutrality, social justice and the obligations of archival education and educators in the twenty-first century

Archival Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Codes of ethics around the globe exhort archivists to neutrality so that they and their repositories will be trusted by records creators, the general public, and posterity to be impartial in their actions. However, archival neutrality is increasingly viewed as a controversial stance for a profession that is situated in the midst of the politics of memory. Archival educators have been prominent among those calling for the profession to address more directly the cultural and ethical dimensions of the role played by archives and records in society. This paper contemplates how archival neutrality and social justice concerns can surface within the context of archival education. Drawing upon experiences of the Department of Information Studies at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), it suggests pedagogical approaches for raising and addressing ethics and diversity issues within a social justice framework, and for encouraging students, as future practitioners and scholars, to engage critically, reflexively, and meaningfully with these issues in ways that support the public trust in archives and the archival profession.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. In North America, ladder, clinical and sometimes adjunct archival academics are referred to as “faculty,” but the term is not used universally worldwide. The Society of American Archivists refers to all those engaged in teaching archival courses as “archival educators” and that term is used here as being more expressive. This keynote address was sponsored by the International Council on Archives Section on Archival Education and Training (ICAI-SAE).

References

  • American Anthropological Association Council on Anthropology and Education (n.d.) http://www.aaanet.org/sections/cae/aboutcae.html. Accessed 5 Aug 2010

  • American Library Association (1995) Code of ethics. http://www.ala.org/ala/aboutala/offices/oif/statementspols/codeofethics/coehistory/codeofethics.pdf. Accessed 5 Aug 2010

  • American Library Association Black Caucus (1997) Mission Statement. http://www.bcala.org/association/mission.htm. Accessed 5 Aug 2010

  • Archives and Records Association (UK and Ireland) (2010) Code of conduct. http://www.archives.org.uk/membership/codeofconduct.html. Accessed 5 Aug 2010

  • Association of Canadian Archivists (1999) Code of ethics. http://archivists.ca/content/code-ethics. Accessed 5 Aug 2010

  • Association of Library and Information Science Educators (2010) Draft ethics guidelines. http://www.alise.org/mc/page.do?sitePageId=103911. Accessed 5 Aug 2010

  • Coleman S, Simpson B (1999) Unintended consequences? Anthropology, pedagogy and personhood. Anthropol Today 15(6):3–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman S, Simpson B (2001) Anthropology inside out: identity and agency in the reproduction of a discipline. Anthropol Action 8(1):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkey MW, Tringham RE (1996) Cultivating thinking/challenging authority: some experiments in feminist pedagogy in archaeology. In: Wright RP (ed) Gender and archaeology. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp 224–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook T (1997) What is past is prologue: a history of archival ideas since 1898, and the future paradigm shift. Archivaria, p 43

  • Cook T (2000) Archival science and postmodernism: new formulations for old concepts, vol 1. Arch Sci1

  • Cook T, Schwartz JM (2002) Archives, records, and power: from (postmodern) theory to (archival) performance. Arch Sci 2:171–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig BL (2004) Archival appraisal: theory and practice. K.G. Saur, Munich

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cultural, Artistic and Scientific knowledge for Preservation, Access and Retrieval (CASPAR) Project (2009) Report on trusted digital repositories. http://www.casparpreserves.eu/publications/deliverables. Accessed 5 Aug 2010

  • Cuno J (2008) Who owns antiquity? Museums and the battle over our ancient heritage. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranti L (2007) Archives as a place. Arch Soc Studs 1:445–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranti L, Preston R (eds) (2008) International research on permanent authentic records in electronic systems (InterPARES) 2: experiential, interactive and dynamic records. Associazione Nazionale Archivistica Italiana, Padova, Italy, pp 261–307. http://www.interpares.org/ip2/book.cfm. Accessed 5 Aug 2010

  • Flinn A (2010) An attack on professionalism and scholarship? Democratising archives and the production of knowledge. Ariadne p 62 http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue62/flinn/. Accessed Aug 5 2010

  • Gilliland A, McKemmish S (2004) Building an infrastructure for archival research. Arch Sci 3(4):149–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Council on Archives (1996) Code of ethics. http://www.ica.org/en/node/30046. Accessed 5 Aug 2010

  • Jimerson RC (2005) Embracing the power of archives, 69th presidential address, Society of American Archivists Annual Meeting, August 2005. http://www.archivists.org/governance/presidential/jimerson.asp. Accessed 5 Aug 2010

  • Jimerson RC (2009) Archives power: memory, accountability, and social justice. Society of American Archivists, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones AL (1993) Exploding canons: the anthropology of museums. Ann Rev of Anthropol 22:201–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketelaar E (1999) Archivalisation and archiving. Arch Manus 27:54–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketelaar E (2001) Tacit narratives: the meaning of archives. Arch Sci 1:131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumbier A (2009) Ephemeral material: developing a critical archival practice. Ph.D. dissertation. Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

  • MacNeil HM, Mak B (2007) Constructions of authenticity. Lib Q 56(1):26–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar L (2004) ICA study 13-2—Authenticity of electronic records: a report prepared for UNESCO and the International Council on Archives. http://www.ica.org/en/node/30209. Accessed 5 Aug 2010

  • Myers P (2004) Max Weber: education as academic and political calling. Ger Stud Rev 27(2):269–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly CT, Rooney WA (2005) Enola Gay and the Smithsonian institution. McFarland & Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pluralizing the Archival Curriculum Group (2011) Educating for the archival multiverse. Am Arch Spring Summer 35:68–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor RN (1991) Value-free science? Purity and power in modern knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainbird P, Hamilakis Y (eds) (2001) Interrogating pedagogies: archaeology in higher education. Archaeopress, Oxford

  • REFORMA (n.d.) National Association to Promote Library and Information Services to Latinos and the Spanish-speaking. Goals. http://www.reforma.org/who.html. Accessed 5 Aug 2010

  • Roth G, Schluchter W (1979) Max Weber’s vision of history, ethics, and method. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson B, Coleman S (2002) Effective ethics and the effects of ethics in anthropological research, teaching and learning. Anthropol Action 9(3):2–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Society for Professional Journalists in the United States (1996) Code of ethics. http://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp. Accessed 5 Aug 2010

  • Society of American Archivists (2005) Code of ethics for archivists. http://www.archivists.org/governance/handbook/app_ethics.asp. Accessed 5 Aug 2010

  • Stevens M, Flinn A, Shepherd E (2010) New frameworks for community engagement in the archive sector: from handing over to handing on. Int J Heritage Studs 16(1 and 2):59–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoler AL (2009) Along the grain: epistemic anxieties and colonial common sense. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone P, MacKenzie R (1990) The excluded past: archaeology in education. Unwin and Hyman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomassen T (1999) Archivists between knowledge and power. On the independence and autonomy of archival science and the archival profession. Archiviski Vjesnik 42:149–167

    Google Scholar 

  • White K, Gilliland A (2010) Promoting reflexivity and inclusivity in archival education, research and practice. Lib Q 80(3):231–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Gilliland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilliland, A. Neutrality, social justice and the obligations of archival education and educators in the twenty-first century. Arch Sci 11, 193–209 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9147-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9147-0

Keywords

Navigation