Skip to main content

Introducing critical race theory to archival discourse: getting the conversation started

Abstract

This article introduces the application of Critical Race Theory (CRT) to archival discourse in order to demonstrate how such a critical and analytical approach can help identify and raise social and professional consciousness of implicit racial bias. To demonstrate the potential of CRT, the paper discusses how the terminology and methodological structures of CRT might be applied to some aspects of archival theory and practice. The paper concludes that CRT can contribute to a diversified archival epistemology that can influence the creation of collective and institutional memories that impact underrepresented and disenfranchised populations and the development of their identities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Bell DA (1973) Race, racism, and American law. Little, Brown, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bell DA (1980) Civil rights – leading cases. Little, Brown, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bell LA (1997) Theoretical foundations and frameworks. In: Adams M, Bell LA, Griffin P (eds) Teaching for diversity and social justice: a sourcebook. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bell DA, Delgado R, Stefancic J (2005) The Derrick Bell reader, critical America. New York University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bowker GC, Star SL (1999) The case of race classification and reclassification under apartheid. Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

  6. Brown EM (1995) The tower of Babel: bridging the divide between critical race theory and “mainstream” civil rights scholarship. Yale Law Journal 105(2):513–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cook T (1997) What is past is prologue. Archivaria 43 (Spring):17–63

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cornell SE, Hartmann D (1998) Ethnicity and race: making identities in a changing world, sociology for a new century. Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cox RJ (1994) The documentation strategy and archival appraisal principles: a different perspective. Archivaria 38 (Fall):11–36

    Google Scholar 

  10. Crabtree CA, Nash GB (1996) National standards for history, Basic ed. National Center for History in the Schools, University of California, Los Angeles, CA

  11. Crenshaw K (1995) Critical race theory: the key writings that formed the movement. New Press, New York. Distributed by W.W. Norton & Co

  12. Davis P (2001) Law as microaggression. In: Delgado R, Stefancic J (eds) Critical race theory: the cutting edge. New York University Press, New York, pp 141–151

    Google Scholar 

  13. Delgado R (1989) The storytelling for oppositionist and others – a plea for narrative. Michigan Law Review 87(8):2411–2441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Delgado R, Stefancic J (2000) Critical race theory: the cutting edge, 2nd edn. Temple University Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  15. Delgado R, Stefancic J (2001) Critical race theory: an introduction, critical America. New York University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Eastwood T (1993) Nailing a little jelly to the wall of archival studies. Archivaria 35(Spring):232–252

    Google Scholar 

  17. Frankenburg R (2001) The mirage of an unmarked whiteness. In: Rasmussen B et al (eds) The making and unmaking of whiteness. Duke University Press, Durham, NC

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gur-Ze’ev I (2003) Destroying the Other’s Collective Memory. P. Lang, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hjørland B (1998) Theory and metatheory of information science: a new interpretation. Journal of Documentation 54(5):606–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ketelaar E (1997) The archival image: collected essays. Bos-Rops Y (ed). Hilversum, Verloren

  21. Ketelaar E (1998) Understanding archives of the people, by the people, and for the people. Washington conference on holocaust era assets: archives, books, and the role of historical commissions (November 30–December 3, 1998), Washington, DC

  22. Lawrence CR III (1993) If he hollers let him go: regulating racist speech on campus. In: Matsuda MJ et al (eds) Words that wound: critical race theory, assaultive speech, and the first amendment. Westview Press, Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lawrence CR III (2002) Foreword: who are we? why are we here? doing critical race theory in hard times. In: Valdes F, Culp JM, Harris AP (eds) Crossroads, directions, and a new critical race theory. Temple University Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  24. Livelton T (1996) Archival theory, records, and the public. Society of American Archivists: Scarecrow Press, Lanham, MD

    Google Scholar 

  25. Maher WJ (1986) The use of user studies. Midwestern Archivist 11(1):15–26

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. MacNeil H (1994) Archival theory and practice: between two paradigms. Archivaria 37 (Spring):6–20

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nash G (1996) The History Wars of the 1990s. Speech given at East Carolina University, The Lawrence F. Brewster Lecture in History. Available at http://www.ecu.edu/history/brewster/b196.htm. (Last accessed 14 February 2006)

  28. Nash GB et al (2000) History on Trial: Culture Wars and the Teaching of the Past, 1st Vintage Books ed. New York: Vintage Books

  29. Newton I (1999) The principia: mathematical principles of natural philosophy. Trans. I. Bernard Cohen and Anne Miller Whitman. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  30. One Gay and Lesbian Archives. Mission statement. Available at http://www.oneinstitute.org/

  31. Pierce C, Carew J, Pierce-Gonzalez D, Willis D (1978) An Experiment in racism: television. In: Pierce C (ed) Television and education. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA

    Google Scholar 

  32. Putnam R (2005) Social capital: what is it? cited 3/17/05. Available from http://www.bowlingalone.com/socialcapital.php3

  33. Schwartz J, Cook T (2002) Archives, records and power: the making of modern memory. Archival Science 2(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Schellenberg TR (1956) Modern archives; principles and techniques. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  35. Society of American Archivists (2005) Glossary of Archival and Records Terminology. Available at http://www.archivists.org/glossary/term_details.asp?DefinitionKey=54

  36. Solorzano DG (1998) Critical race theory, race, and gender microaggressions, and the experience of Chicana and Chicano scholars. Qualitative Studies in Education 11(1):121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Solorzano DG, Yasso TJ (2002) Critical race methodology: counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry 8(1):23–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Taylor E (1998) A primer on critical race theory. The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education 19:122–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Taylor HA (2003) Administrative history: an archivist need. In: Taylor HA, Cook T, Dodds G (eds), Imagining archives: essays and reflections by Hugh A. Taylor. [Chicago]: Society of American Archivists; [Ottawa]: Association of Canadian Archivists; Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press

  40. Thompson A (1999) Colortalk: whiteness and off white. Educational Studies 30(2):141–160

    Google Scholar 

  41. Thompson A (2002) Summary of whiteness ([cited March 20 2005]); available from http://www.pauahtun.org/Whiteness-Summary-1.html

  42. Tschan R (2002) A comparison of Jenkinson and Schellenberg on appraisal. American Archivist 65(2):176–195

    Google Scholar 

  43. Upward F (1996) Structuring the records continuum part one: post-custodial principles and properties. Archives and Manuscripts 24(2):268–285

    Google Scholar 

  44. Upward F (1997) Structuring the records continuum part two: structuration theory and recordkeeping. Archives and Manuscripts 25(1):10–13

    Google Scholar 

  45. Vogt WP (1999) Dictionary of statistics & methodology: a nontechnical guide for the social sciences, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  46. West C (2001) Race matters. Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony W. Dunbar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dunbar, A.W. Introducing critical race theory to archival discourse: getting the conversation started. Arch Sci 6, 109–129 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-006-9022-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Critical race theory
  • Archival terminology
  • Discourse
  • Recordkeeping practice
  • Social justice
  • Counter story
  • Microaggression
  • Record
  • Identity
  • Social construct
  • Underrepresented population
  • Marginalized population
  • Disenfranchised population
  • Collective memory
  • Institutional memory