Abstract
Recent scholarship in archival studies has employed “non-traditional” modes of analysis to theorize the nature of the record and recordkeeping in organizational contexts. In that tradition, this paper discusses the author’s use of ethnographic methodology to study recordkeeping in one academic research laboratory. The paper explores how ethnography contributes to our understanding of the laboratory as a recordkeeping organization and the intersections of scientific practice and the kinds of records scientists create and use. The paper calls for more analysis of recordkeeping as an information infrastructure and inquiry into the nature of the record in other kinds of knowledge production environments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
W.M. Duff (1998) ArticleTitle“Harnessing the power of warrant” American Archivist 61 88–105
C.A. Elliot (1983) Understanding Progress as Process: Final Report of the Joint Committee on Archives of Science and Technology Society of American Archivists Chicago
R.M. Emerson R.I. Fretz L.L. Shaw (1997) Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes University of Chicago Press Chicago
C. Geertz (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures; Selected Essays Basic Books New York
Gracy, K.F., “Documenting Communities of Memory of Practice: Making the Case for Archival Ethnography”, in this volume
D. Hakken (1999) Cyborgs@Cyberspace? An Ethnographer Looks to the Future Routledge New York
F.L. Holmes (1990) ArticleTitle“Laboratory Notebooks: Can the Daily Record Illuminate the Broader Picture?” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 134 IssueID4 349–366
J.E. Jackson (1990b) ArticleTitle“Deja Entendu: The Liminal Quality of Anthropological Fieldnotes” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 19 IssueID1 8–43
V. Lemieux (2001) ArticleTitle“Let the Ghosts Speak: An Empirical Exploration of the “Nature” of the Record” Archivaria 51 81–111
B. Latour S. Woolgar (1986) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ
S.M. Long (1995) ArticleTitle“Documenting Federal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) – A Discussion of Appraisal Criteria and Applications for the National Archives and Records Administration” Journal of Government Information 22 IssueID4 311–319 Occurrence Handle10.1016/1352-0237(95)00010-Z
C. Marshall G.B. Rossman (1989) Designing Qualitative Research SAGE Publications, Inc Newbury Park, CA
S. McKemmish F. Upward (1993) Archival Documents: Providing Accountability Through Recordkeeping Ancora Press Melbourne, Australia
A.J. Meehan (1986) ArticleTitle“Record-Keeping Practices in the Policing of Juveniles” Urban Life 15 IssueID1 70–102
P.M. Ngin (1994) ArticleTitle“Recordkeeping Practices of Nurses in Hospitals” American Archivist 57 IssueID1 616–630
S.L. Star (1999) ArticleTitle“The Ethnography of Infrastructure” The American Behavioral Scientist 43 IssueID3 371–391
S.L. Star G.C. Bowker (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA
S.L. Star K. Ruhleder (1996) ArticleTitle“Steps Towards an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Systems” Information Systems Research 7 IssueID1 111–134
C.B. Trace (2002) ArticleTitle“What is Recorded is Never Simply ‘What Happened:’ Record-Keeping in Modern Organizational Culture” Archival Science: International Journal of Recorded Information 2 IssueID1 137–159
J. Maanen Particlevan B.T. Pentland (1994) “Cops and Auditors: The Rhetoric of Records” S.B. Sitkin R.J. Bies (Eds) The Legalistic Organization SAGE Publications Thousand Oaks, CA
J. Warnow-Blewett A.J. Capitos J. Genuth S.R. Weart (1995) Report No. 1: Summary of Project Activities and Findings/Project Recommendations American Institute of Physics New York
L. Winner (1985) “Do Artifacts have Politics?” J. Wajcman E. Mackenzie (Eds) The Social Shaping of Technology Open University Press Milton Keynes, Philadelphia 28–38
E. Yakel (1996) ArticleTitle“The Way Things Work: Procedures, Processes, Institutional Records” American Archivist 59 454–464
E. Yakel (2001) ArticleTitle“The Social Construction of Accountability: Radiologists and Their Record-Keeping Practices” Information Society 17 IssueID4 233–245 Occurrence Handle10.1080/019722401753330832
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shankar, K. Recordkeeping in the Production of Scientific Knowledge: An Ethnographic Study. Arch Sci 4, 367–382 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-005-2600-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-005-2600-1