Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Economic feasibility of Pabda and stinging catfish culture in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) in Bangladesh

  • Published:
Aquaculture International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) is a unique approach that offers total control to culture a wide variety of aquatic species. As capital investment is higher for setting up RAS, it is necessary to conduct an economic feasibility analysis based on real data. A structured questionnaire was used to collect all economic and technical data on two catfish species, viz., Pabda (Ompok pabda) and Shing (Heteropneustes fossilis), cultured in an RAS farm. The ultimate objective was to estimate net cash flow, net present value (NPV), profitability index (PI), payback period, discounted payback period, internal rate of return (IRR), and sensitivity analysis to find out the best profitability indicators. The analysis revealed that the IRR were 4% and 16% for Pabda and Shing production, respectively. However, for Pabda and Shing productions, the payback periods were 15 years and 4 months and 6 years and 2 months, respectively. The NPV value was positive for Shing production and negative for Pabda. On the other hand, the PI was lower than one for Pabda production and higher than one for Shing production. Therefore, the results showed that the Shing production in the RAS facility could be economically feasible; however, Pabda production may not be viable in RAS due to lower production and longer culture period. This study may suggest that by increasing the production capacity of the farm and market price of the product through the proper supply chain and by decreasing the initial investment, cost of fingerlings and feed, profitability can be achieved in RAS in Bangladesh.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad R (2017) Indoor farming: novel way to up fish yield. The Daily Star, Bangladesh. (https://www.thedailystar.net/frontpage/indoor-farming-novel-way-fish-yield-1358101, accessed on 14 August, 2021)

  • Ali SA (2012) A techno-financial analysis of tilapia production in the recirculating aquaculture systems. Misr J Agric Eng 29(4):1583–1602. https://doi.org/10.21608/mjae.2012.101383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appiah-Kubi F (2012) An economic analysis of the use of recirculating aquaculture systems in the production of Tilapia [master’s thesis]. Department of Animal and Aquaculture Sciences. Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  • Belton B, Karim M, Thilsted S, Murshed-E-Jahan K, Collis W, Phillips M (2011) Review of aquaculture and fish consumption in Bangladesh. Studies and Reviews 2011-53. The WorldFish Center

  • Bostock J, Lane A, Hough C, Yamamoto K (2016) An assessment of the economic contribution of EU aquaculture production and the influence of policies for its sustainable development. Aquacult Int 24(3):699–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-016-9992-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulet D, Struthers A, Gilbert E (2010) Feasibility study of closed-containment options for the British Columbia Aquaculture Industry. Fisheries and Oceans Canada

  • Bregnballe J (2015) A guide to recirculation aquaculture: an introduction to the new environmentally friendly and highly productive closed fish farming systems (2015 ed.). The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and Eurofish International Organization. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4626e.pdf. Accessed 18 Jul 2020

  • De Ionno PN, Wines GL, Jones PL, Collins RO (2006) A bioeconomic evaluation of a commercial scale recirculating finfish growout system: an Australian perspective. Aquaculture 259(1):315–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.05.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Campo LM, Ibarra P, Gutiérrez X, Takle H (2010) Utilization of sludge from recirculation aquaculture systems. Nofima, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling J, Jensen G, Losordo T, Masser M, McMullen J, Pfeiffer L, Sette M (1995) Model aquaculture recirculation system (MARS): engineering and operations manual: aquaculture education project. Department of Agricultural Education and Studies. Iowa State University, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Einen O, Roem AJ (1997) Dietary protein/energy ratios for Atlantic salmon in relation to fish size: growth, feed utilization and slaughter quality. Aquacult Nutr 3(2):115–126. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2095.1997.00084.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle CR, Kumar G, van Senten J (2020) Cost drivers and profitability of U.S. ponds, raceways, and RAS aquaculture. JWorld Aquacult Soc 2020:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fern M (2014) An economic comparison of three intensive fish production systems [master’s thesis]. Aquaculture and Aquatic Sciences, Auburn University, School of Fisheries

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (2006) State of world aquaculture (Tech. paper no. 500). Rome, Italy

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (2018) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2018: meeting the sustainable development goals. Rome, Italy

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (2020) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2020: sustainability in action. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9229en

  • Godfray HC, Beddington JR, Crute IR, Haddad L, Lawrence D, Muir JF, Toulmin C (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327(5967):812–818. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Head WD, Watanabe WO (1995) Economic analysis of a commercial scale, recirculating, brackish water hatchery for Florida Red Tilapia. J Appl Aquacult 5(2):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1300/J028v05n02_01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff KG (1998) Cost performance volume analysis. In: Hoff KG (ed) Basic Business Management. Tano Aschehoug, AiTEnger AS, Otta, Norway, pp 379–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam MR, Hassan MZ (2011) Land use changing pattern and challenges for agricultural land: a study on Rajshahi District. J Life Earth Sci 6:69–74. https://doi.org/10.3329/jles.v6i0.9724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazmierczak R, Caffey R (1995) Management ability and the economics of recirculating aquaculture production systems. Mar Resour Econ 10(2):187–209 Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/42629110. Accessed 18 Jul 2020

  • Larson KD, Wild JJ, Chiappetta B (2002) Fundamental accounting principles (16th ed). McGraw-Hill Irwin Publishing, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazur AM, Goldman J, Semmens KJ, Timmons MB (2003) Land-based aquaculture production systems, engineering, and technology: opportunities and needs. Northeastern Regional Aquaculture Center. Publication No. 03-002. 17 pp.

  • Losordo TM, Westerman PW (1994) An analysis of biological, economic and engineering factors affecting the cost of fish production in recirculating aquaculture systems. J World Aquacult Soc 25(2):193–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.1994.tb00181.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins CIM, Eding EH, Verdegem MCJ, Heinsbroek LTN, Schneider O, Blancheton JP, Rogue d’Orbcastel E, Verreth JAJ (2010) New developments in recirculating aquaculture systems in Europe: a perspective on environmental sustainability. Aquacult Eng 43(3):83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2010.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammad T, Moulick S, Mukherjee CK (2018) Economic feasibility of goldfish (Carassius auratus Linn.) recirculating aquaculture system. Aquacult Res 49(9):2945–2953. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray F, Bostock J, Fletcher D (2014) Review of recirculation aquaculture system technologies and their commercial application. University of Stirling Aquaculture, Highlands and Islands Enterprise

    Google Scholar 

  • NCRAC (2002) Tilapia report. https://www.ncrac.org/files/project/files/tilapiareport2_0.pdf. Accessed on 10 July 2020

  • Ngoc PTA, Meuwissen MP, Cong Tru L, Bosma RH, Verreth J, Lansink AO (2016) Economic feasibility of recirculating aquaculture systems in pangasius farming. Aquacult Econ Manag 20(2):185–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2016.1156190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke PD (1991) Current status on profits in recirculating systems, In: Regional Workshop on Commercial Fish Culture Using Water Recirculating Systems. IL-IN-SG-E-91-8. Illinois/Indiana Sea Grant, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois, pp 65-99

  • O’Rourke PD (1996) The economics of recirculating aquaculture systems. In: Successes and failures in commercial re-circulating aquaculture. Proceedings of an international workshop, Roanoke, Virginia, VA, USA, pp 61–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira DAS, Henriques MB (2019) Economic feasibility for producing Imperial Zebra pleco (Hypancistrus zebra) in recirculating aquaculture systems: an alternative for a critically endangered ornamental fish. Aquacult. Econ. Manag. 23(4):428–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2019.1641574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty JW, Peacock R, Martin P, Burrow M, Keown AJ, Scott DF, Martin JD (1996) Basic financial management. Prentice Hall Publishing, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawlinson P (2002) The economic efficiencies of partial and intensive recirculation aquaculture systems for Murray cod. In: Ingram BA (ed) Murray Cod Aquaculture: Now and into the Future Victorian Institute of Animal Science. Attwood, Victoria, Australia, pp 17–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider O, Blancheton JP, Varadi L, Eding EH, Verreth JAJ (2006) Cost price and production strategies in European recirculation systems. In:Conference Aqua 2006: Linking Tradition & Technology Highest Quality for the Consumer, Firenze (Florence), Italy, 9-13 May 2006, pp 855

  • Shang YC (1990) Aquaculture economic analysis: an introduction. World Aquaculture Society

    Google Scholar 

  • Terjesen BF, Ulgenes Y, Færa SO, Summerfelt ST, Brunsvik P, Baeverfjord G, Nerland S, Takle H, Norvik OC, Kittelsen A (2008) RAS research facility dimensioning and design: a special case compared to planning production systems. In: Aquaculture Engineering Society Issues Forum Proceedings, Roanoke, Virginia, 23–24 July, pp 223–238

  • Timmons MB, Ebeling JB (2013) Recirculating aquaculture, 3rd edn. Ithaca Publishing Company, LLC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright A, Arianpoo N (2010) Technologies for viable salmon aquaculture: an examination of land-based closed containment aquaculture: a public domain report. SOS Marine Conservation Foundation

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Availability of data and material

All relevant data are included in the manuscript and in supplementary materials.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was partially supported by the University Grants Commission of Bangladesh through the University of Dhaka for the financial year 2018–2019; Arifa received the National Science and Technology (NST) fellowship of Bangladesh as an MS research student.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Aquatic Animal Health Group, Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh

    Arifa, Mst Khadiza Begum & Mohammad Shamsur Rahman

  2. Department of Banking and Insurance, Faculty of Business Studies, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh

    Raad Mozib Lalon

  3. Agro3 Fish Hatchery & Culture Farm, Mymensingh, 2202, Bangladesh

    ABM Shamsul Alam

Authors
  1. Arifa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mst Khadiza Begum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Raad Mozib Lalon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. ABM Shamsul Alam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mohammad Shamsur Rahman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Arifa: investigation, data curation, formal analysis, writing – original draft preparation. Mst Khadiza Begum: data curation, formal analysis, writing – original draft preparation. Raad Mozib Lalon: formal analysis, writing – reviewing and editing. ABM Shamsul Alam: investigation, resources, writing – reviewing and editing. Mohammad Shamsur Rahman: conceptualization, methodology, resources, supervision, writing – reviewing and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Shamsur Rahman.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Gavin Burnell

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arifa, Begum, M.K., Lalon, R.M. et al. Economic feasibility of Pabda and stinging catfish culture in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) in Bangladesh. Aquacult Int 30, 445–465 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-021-00807-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-021-00807-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation