Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Competitiveness of Chinese and Indonesian tilapia exports in the US market

  • Published:
Aquaculture International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the export performance and competitiveness of Chinese and Indonesian tilapia in the US market. We analyzed the factors that influence exports by using the constant market share model according to data from the USDA aquaculture database between 1996 and 2017. The results showed that the changes in the US market demand had a great impact on the tilapia industry in China and Indonesia but especially the latter. During 2014–2017, the product structures in China and Indonesia were not suitable to meet the demands of the US market, but Indonesian tilapia products exhibited stronger export performance compared with those from China. Changing the current status requires efforts to promote the transformation of Chinese tilapia into low supply, high quality, and high price products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Administration of Fishery in Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the people’s Republic of China, National Fisheries Technology Extension Center, China Society of Fisheries (2018) China fishery Statistical Yearbook. The production of freshwater aquaculture fish: 31

  • Ahmadi-Esfahani FZ (2006) Constant market shares analysis: uses, limitations and prospects.Australian. J Agric Resour Econ 50(4):510–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2006.00364.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi-Esfahani FZ, Jensen PH (1994) Impact of the US-EC price war on major wheat exporters’ shares of the Chinese market. Agric Econ 10(1):61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5150(94)90040-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiginger K, Vogel J (2015) Competitiveness: from a misleading concept to a strategy supporting beyond GDP goals. Compet Rev 25(5):497–523. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-06-2015-0052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JL (2006) The seafood industry: 2020. International Boston seafood show. Boston, MA. [online] available at: http://seafoodreport.com/uploaded_docs/Boston_2006_JLA.p [accessed 12-14 march 2016]

  • Asche F, Bellemare MF, Roheim C, Smith MD, Tveteras S (2015) Fair enough? Food security and the international trade of seafood. World Dev 67:151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balassa B (1965) Trade liberalization and “revealed” comparative advantage. Manchester School Econ Soc Stud 33(2):99–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno M (1972) Domestic resource costs and effective protection: clarifications and synthesis. J Polit Econ 80(1):16–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley PJ, Pass CL, Prescott K (1988) Measures of international competitiveness: a critical survey. J Mark Manag 4(2):175–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.1988.9964068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budiono A (2002) Country report: Indonesia. In: Review of the State of World Aquaculture (Draft Copy) Inland Water Resources and Aquaculture Service Fishery Resource Division FAO Fisheries Department FAO Fisheries Circular No. 886, Rome, Italy: 176–188; 130

  • Chen KZ, Duan Y (2001) Competitiveness of Canadian agri-food exports against competitors in Asia: 1980–97. J Int Food Agribusiness Mark 11(4):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1300/J047v11n04_01

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cho DS (1994) A Dynamic approach to international competitiveness: the case of korea. Asia Pacific Bus Rev 1(1):17–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602389400000002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai YY, Yuan YM, Zhang HY, He YH (2013) Analysis on export trade and outlook of tilapia in China in 2012. Chin Fish Econ 2:170–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai YY, Yuan YM, Yuan Y, Zhang HY (2014) Study on the affecting factors of Chinese tilapia export: based on gravity model. Chin Fish Econ 6:96–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado CL, Wada N, Rosegrant MW, Meijer S, Ahmed M (2003) Fish to 2020: supply and demand in changing global markets. International Food Policy Research Institute and the World Fish Center

  • Dey MM, Rabbani AG, Singh K, Engle CR (2014) Determinants of retail price and sales volume of catfish products in the United States: an application of retail scanner data. Aquac Econ Manag 18(2):120–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2014.903312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhehibi B, Frija A (2009) Impact of domestic resource costs on the competitiveness of Tunisian fresh fruit and vegetable products exports. Paper prepared to be presented to the international conference “energy, climate change and sustainable development”, 15th–17th June, Hammamet, Tunisia. Retrieved from http://www.ps2d.net/media/Boubaker%20Dhehibi.pdf

  • Fagerberg J, Sollie G (1987) The method of constant market shares analysis reconsidered. Appl Econ 19(12):1571–1583. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036848700000084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan XB (2011) Tilapia in China: the fish contributed to the World by China in the 21st Century – study on tilapia's consumption, cultivation, competition and marketing. Ocean Fish 2:50–52

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2018) FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Fishery Information, Data and Statistics Unit. FishStatJ, a tool for fishery statistics analysis, Release: 3.04.5, Universal Software for Fishery Statistical Time Series. Global aquaculture production: Quantity 1950–2016; Value 1950–2016

  • Feldman MRA (1994) Measures of external competitiveness for Germany. International Money Fund, Working paper

  • Ferdouse F (2001). Tilapia in Asian markets: can we sell more? In Subasinghe S and Tarlochan S (eds) Tilapia: production, marketing and technological developments. Proceedings of the Tilapia 2001 International Technical and Trade Conference on Tilapia, 28–30 May , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: 71

  • Fitzsimmons K (2000) Future trends of tilapia aquaculture in the Americas. Tilapia Aquac Am 2:252–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan R, Lu W, Shen L, Jewell C (2007) Competitiveness in construction: a critical review of research. Constr Manag Econ 25(9):989–1000. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190701258039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogarasi J (2003) The competitiveness of Hungarian cereals. PhD Dissertation, Corvinus University of Budapest

  • Fogarasi J (2008) Hungarian and Romanian Agri-food trade in the European Union. Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper 3(1), 3–13

  • Halbrendt C, Wang Q, Fraiz C, O'Dierno L (1995) Marketing problems and opportunities in mid-Atlantic seafood retailing. Am J Agric Econ 77(5):1313–1318. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1243367. Accessed 10 Dec 1995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jepma CJ (1989) Extensions of the constant-market-shares analysis with an application to long-term export data of developing countries. In: The Balance between Industry and Agriculture in Economic Development. Palgrave Macmillan, UK, 129–143

  • Kobayashi M, Msangi S, Batka M, Vannuccini S, Dey MM, Anderson JL (2015) Fish to 2030: the role and opportunity for aquaculture. Aquac Econ Manag 19(3):282–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman PR, Hatsopoulos GN (1987) The problem of U.S. competitiveness in manufacturing. New-England economic review, January: 18–19

  • Li XZ, Wang B (2010) Empirical studies of the international market power of China's tilapia industry: case of American market. Issues Agric Econ 8:70–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad NMN, Yaacob HC (2008) Export competitiveness of Malaysian electrical and electronic (E&E) product: comparative study of China, Indonesia and Thailand. Int J Bus Manag 3(7):65–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir JF, Young JA (1999) Strategic issues in new species development for aquaculture. Elsevier biofutures series. XXXIII international symposium on new species for Mediterranean aquaculture: 85-96. Amsterdam: Elsevier

  • Norman-Lopez A, Asche F (2008) Competition between imported tilapia and US catfish in the US market. Mar Resour Econ 23(2):199–214. https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.23.2.42629611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rammer C, Gottschalk S, Peneder M, Wörter M, Stucki T, Arvanitis S (2017) Does energy policy hurt international competitiveness of firms? a comparative study for Germany, Switzerland and Austria. Energy Policy 109:154–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson JD (1971) Constant-market-shares analysis of export growth. J Int Econ 1:227–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(71)90058-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton WL (2002) Tilapia culture in the 21st century. In: Guerrero RD III, Guerrero-del Castillo MR (eds) Tilapia Farming in the 21st Century. Philippine Fisheries Association Inc., Los Banos, pp 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui AH (2018) Negative export growth of Pakistan during 2011-16:a constant market share analysis. J Bus Strateg 12(1):61–70. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327261655. Accessed 1 June 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh K, Dey MM, Surathkal P (2014) Seasonal and spatial variations in demand for and elasticities of fish products in the United States: an analysis based on market-level scanner data. Can J Agric Econ 62:343–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran N, Rodriguez UP, Chan CY, Phillips MJ, Mohan CV, Henriksson PJG, Koeshendrajana S, Suri S, Hall S (2017) Indonesian aquaculture futures: an analysis of fish supply and demand in Indonesia to 2030 and role of aquaculture using the Asia fish model. Mar Policy 79:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyszynski H (1951) World trade in manufactured commodities, 1899–1950. Manch Sch 19:272–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1951.tb00012.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang HZ, Che B (2010) SWOT analysis and strategies of Chinese tilapia industry. Hunan Agric Sci 1:125–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang HZ, Che B, Chen GP (2010) Export status of China's tilapia and the corresponding measures. J Shanxi Agric Sci 38(8):81–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng XW, Hong HZ, Ling LP, Tong J (2017) Decomposition of the factors influencing export fluctuation in China's new energy industry based on a constant market share model. Energy Policy 10:22–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu JL, Yang H (2011) SWOT analysis and countermeasure discussion of tilapia quality and safety in China. Chin Fish Econ 29(6):122–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu HP, Lu MX, Huang ZH, Gao FY (2009) The current status of China’s tilapia processing, advantages of industrialization development and measures to improve export competitiveness. Fish Sci Technol 5:15–18

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the China Agriculture Research System 46 (Characteristic Freshwater Fish) and the National Nonprofit Institute Research Grant of Freshwater Fisheries Research Center (CAFS) (2019JBFM08).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong-Ming Yuan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest and ethical statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dai, YY., Yuan, YM., Yuan, Y. et al. Competitiveness of Chinese and Indonesian tilapia exports in the US market. Aquacult Int 28, 791–804 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-019-00496-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-019-00496-x

Keywords