Aquaculture International

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 969–973 | Cite as

Application of real-time PCR for specific detection of Lepeophtheirus salmonis in fluid samples from lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus) stomachs

  • Jonhard EysturskarðEmail author
  • Ása Johannesen
  • Kirstin Eliasen


The Norwegian Food Safety Authority recently stated that stomach flushing is in violation of the Animal Welfare Act. The objective of our research was to develop a genetic method for the routine identification of Lepeophtheirus salmonis in stomach fluid samples taken through the mouth of lumpfish. The established method was based on a previously published real-time PCR assay targeting the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (mtCOI) gene in L. salmonis. Lumpfish were fed with L. salmonis, then captured upon ingestion and subsequently transferred to an incubation tank. The method was used to test 62 fluid samples collected during the first, second and third days post L. salmonis consumption. No DNA extraction or purification was used prior to the real-time PCR. The results were compared with visual examination subsequent to dissection. Visual identification was able to identify 51 L. salmonis (82%) whereas real-time PCR was able to detect 59 L. salmonis (95%) out of the 62 examined samples. The results indicate that real-time PCR assays can be used for specific detection of L. salmonis in fluid samples from the stomach of lumpfish. Furthermore, our study demonstrates that the PCR assay offers a reliable non-lethal alternative to dissection or stomach flushing and the subsequent visual identification of L. salmonis.


Lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpusStomach flushing Lepeophtheirus salmonis Real-time PCR 



The study was financed by the Aquaculture Research Station of the Faroes. We would like to thank Ingibjørg Joana Mortensen, Faroese Veterinary Service, Faroe Islands, Birna Højsted and Sólvá Samuelsen, Aquaculture Research Station of the Faroes, as well as Julia Frank and Malin Wollens, University of Applied Sciences, Bremerhaven, Germany, for their practical assistance.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Costello MJ (2009) The global economic cost of sea lice to the salmonid farming industry. J Fish Dis 32:115–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Deady S, Varian SJA, Fives JM (1995) The use of cleaner-fish to control sea lice on two Irish salmon (Salmo salar) farms with particular reference to wrasse behaviour in salmon cages. Aquaculture 131:73–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dingemanse NJ, Barber I, Wright J, Brommer JE (2012) Quantitative genetics of behavioural reaction norms: genetic correlations between personality and behavioural plasticity vary across stickleback populations. J Evol Biol 25:485–496CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Imsland AK, Reynolds P, Eliassen G, Hangstad TA, Foss A, Vikingstad E, Elvegård TA (2014) The use of lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus L.) to control sea lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis Krøyer) infestations in intensively farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Aquaculture 424-425:18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Imsland AK, Reynolds P, Eliassen G, Mortensen A, Hansen ØJ, Puvanendran V, Hangstad TA, Jónsdóttir ÓDP, Emaus P-A, Elvegård TA, Lemmens SCA, Rydland R, Nytrø AV, Jonassen TM (2016) Is cleaning behaviour in lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus) parentally controlled? Aquaculture 459:156–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mattilsynet (2016) Mageskylling av rognkjeks er i strid med dyrevelferdsloven. Cited 21 Mar 2016
  7. McBeath A, Penston M, Snow M, Cook P, Bricknell I, Cunningham C (2006) Development and application of real-time PCR for specific detection of Lepeophtheirus salmonis and Caligus elongatus larvae in Scottish plankton samples. Dis Aquat Org 73:141–150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Skiftesvik AB, Blom G, Agnalt A-L, Durif CMF, Browman HI, Bjelland RM, Harkestad LS, Farestveit E, Paulsen OI, Fauske M, Havelin T, Johnsen K, Mortensen S (2014) Wrasse (Labridae) as cleaner fish in salmonid aquaculture—the Hardangerfjord as a case study. Mar Biol Res 10:289–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Treasurer JW (2002) A review of potential pathogens of sea lice and the application of cleaner fish in biological control. Pest Manag Sci 58:546–558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aquaculture Research Station of the FaroesHvalvíkFaroe Islands
  2. 2.Department of Food Technology, Faculty of TechnologyNTNU – Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations