Innovation and educational changes: two e-Learning cases in aquaculture
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the potential changes that education innovation can bring to education and training in aquaculture. When introducing Information and Communication Technology methods into new educational contexts, situations and/or practices, in the process teacher/practitioners will almost always make use of innovatory technology which in itself can lead to a measure of change within the relevant educational system. Nevertheless, it should not be forgotten that the use of technology is not an end in itself, its use is only justified as a tool to achieve the educational goals that have been set. It is in this spirit that two case studies are presented from current aquaculture curricula, which make use of innovative teaching methodology in the form of e-Learning: one case study is from the Open University (Universidade Aberta) in Portugal [distance teaching in a Master’s programme (Second Cycle)]; the second is from the NAFC Marine Centre, Scottish Qualifications Authority accredited courses in Scotland, UK. We report the pedagogical models on which these courses were built, the tools required to achieve the intended educational objectives and the teaching and learning resources used. We also report the creative stimulus inherent in the innovation processes that allowed the two teachers/instructors to achieve the same, or better, results than traditional teacher-led classroom methods, by using a technology-enhanced teaching process without the need for face-to-face interaction.
Keywords
Aquaculture Educational change Educational innovation e-Learning ICT toolsAbbreviations
- FAO
UN Food and Agriculture Organisation
- ICT
Information and Communication Technology
- IT Staff
Information Technology Staff
- HE
High Education
- LMP
Learning Management Platform
Portable Document Format
- SCORM
Sharable Content Object Reference Model
- SQA
Scottish Qualifications Authority
- WebCT
Web Course Tools
Notes
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge ‘Margaret Eleftheriou’.
References
- Anderson A, Elloumi F (eds) (2008) Theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca University, Athabasca. http://www.aupress.ca/index.php/books/. Accessed 5 Dec 2010
- Biasutti M (2011) The student experience of a collaborative e-learning university module. Comput Educ 57:1865–1875. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- David PA (1990) The dynamo and the computer: an historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox [Electronic edition]. Am Econ Rev 80(2):355–361. http://www.compilerpress.atfreeweb.com/Anno%20David%20The%20Dynamo%20and%20the%20Computer%20An%20Historical%20Perspective%20on%20the%20Modern%20AER%201990.htm
- Demos (2004) Report of the learning working group ‘learning to learn’. http://www.demos.co.uk/search?q=learning+to+learn. Accessed 16 May 2009
- FAO (2011) World aquaculture 2010. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department. Technical Paper 500(1). Rome, FAO, pp 105. http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/ba0132e/ba0132e00.htm
- Fleischmann K (2013) Big Bang technology: what’s next in design education, radical innovation or incremental change? J Learn Des 6(3):1–17Google Scholar
- Fullan M (2007) The new meaning of educational change, 4th edn. Teachers College Press, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Groff J (2013) Technology-rich innovative learning environments. OECD CERI Innovative Learning Environment projectGoogle Scholar
- ITL Research (2011) Innovative teaching and learning research—findings and implications. ITL Research—Innovative Teaching and LearningGoogle Scholar
- Joint Information Systems Committee (2008) Effective practice with e-Portfolios. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/effectivepracticeeportfolios.pdf
- Joint Information Systems Committee (2014) Introduction to e-Learning. http://www.jiscdigitalmedia.ac.uk/guide/introduction-to-elearning. Accessed 14 Feb 2014
- Katuk N, Kim JH (2013) Experience beyond knowledge: pragmatic e-learning systems design with learning experience. Comput Hum Behav 29:747–758. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Livingstone I, Matthews H (2000) Assessing and recording a skills-based curriculum. Cheltenham, Geography Discipline Network (GDN)Google Scholar
- MClaughlin MW, Mitra D (2001) Theory-based change and change-based theory: going deeper, going broader. J Educ Change 2(4):301–323. doi: 10.1023/A:1014616908334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nicol D, Macfarlane-Dick D (2006) Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good practice. http://www.reap.ac.uk/public/Papers/DN_SHE_Final.pdf. Accessed 10 March 2009
- Oblinger DG, Oblinger J L (eds) (2005) Educating the Net Generation, An Educause ebook publication. http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7101.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan 2013
- OECD (2010) Inspired by technology, driven by pedagogy: a systemic approach to technology-based school innovations. OECD-Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Centre for Educational Research and InnovationGoogle Scholar
- Palacios-Marqués D, Cortés-Grao R, Carral C (2013) Outstanding knowledge competences and web 2.0 practices for developing successful e-learning project management. Int J Project Manage 31(1):14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Peacock S, Murray S (2009) Learners’ initial expectations and experiences of ePortfolios: a pilot study. eJ Learn Teach 2(4). ISSN 1744-7747. http://bejlt.brookes.ac.uk/Brookes. Accessed 15 Jan 2014
- Pereira A, Mendes A, Morgado L, Amante L, Bidarra J (2008) Universidade Aberta’s Pedagogical Model for Distance Education. A University for the future. Universidade Aberta, EuropressGoogle Scholar
- Prensky M (2001) Digital natives, Digital immigrants part 1. Horiz 9(5):1–6Google Scholar
- Saadé R, Morin D, Thomas J (2012) Critical thinking in e-learning environments. Comput Hum Behav 28(5):1608–1617. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Seixas S, Bostock J, Eleftheriou M (2012) Promoting sustainable aquaculture: building the capacity of local institutions and online teaching (elearning). Manag Environ Qual 23(4):434–450. doi: 10.1108/14777831211232245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sergiovanni TJ (2000) Leadership for the schoolhouse—How is it different? Why is it important?. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- Shetland News (2013) Shetland’s worth £1.1 billion. http://www.shetnews.co.uk/news/6842-shet. Accessed 23 May 2013
- Siemens G, Tittenberge P (2009) Handbook of Emerging Technologies for Learning. http://elearnspace.org/Articles/HETL.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2013
- TACCLE (2009) TACCLE—teachers’ aids on creating content for learning environments: the e-learning handbook for classroom teachers. GO! onderwijs van de Vlaamse gemeenschap, Brussel, p 130Google Scholar
- Wang Y (2012) Education in a changing world: flexibility, skills, and employability. The World Bank, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- World Bank (2011) Learning for all: investing in people’s knowledge and skills to promote development. World Bank Group Education Strategy 2020, WashingtonGoogle Scholar