Aquaculture International

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 843–859 | Cite as

Innovation and educational changes: two e-Learning cases in aquaculture

  • Sónia Seixas
  • Sathappan Saravanan
  • Susana Gonçalves
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the potential changes that education innovation can bring to education and training in aquaculture. When introducing Information and Communication Technology methods into new educational contexts, situations and/or practices, in the process teacher/practitioners will almost always make use of innovatory technology which in itself can lead to a measure of change within the relevant educational system. Nevertheless, it should not be forgotten that the use of technology is not an end in itself, its use is only justified as a tool to achieve the educational goals that have been set. It is in this spirit that two case studies are presented from current aquaculture curricula, which make use of innovative teaching methodology in the form of e-Learning: one case study is from the Open University (Universidade Aberta) in Portugal [distance teaching in a Master’s programme (Second Cycle)]; the second is from the NAFC Marine Centre, Scottish Qualifications Authority accredited courses in Scotland, UK. We report the pedagogical models on which these courses were built, the tools required to achieve the intended educational objectives and the teaching and learning resources used. We also report the creative stimulus inherent in the innovation processes that allowed the two teachers/instructors to achieve the same, or better, results than traditional teacher-led classroom methods, by using a technology-enhanced teaching process without the need for face-to-face interaction.

Keywords

Aquaculture Educational change Educational innovation e-Learning ICT tools 

Abbreviations

FAO

UN Food and Agriculture Organisation

ICT

Information and Communication Technology

IT Staff

Information Technology Staff

HE

High Education

LMP

Learning Management Platform

PDF

Portable Document Format

SCORM

Sharable Content Object Reference Model

SQA

Scottish Qualifications Authority

WebCT

Web Course Tools

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge ‘Margaret Eleftheriou’.

References

  1. Anderson A, Elloumi F (eds) (2008) Theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca University, Athabasca. http://www.aupress.ca/index.php/books/. Accessed 5 Dec 2010
  2. Biasutti M (2011) The student experience of a collaborative e-learning university module. Comput Educ 57:1865–1875. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. David PA (1990) The dynamo and the computer: an historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox [Electronic edition]. Am Econ Rev 80(2):355–361. http://www.compilerpress.atfreeweb.com/Anno%20David%20The%20Dynamo%20and%20the%20Computer%20An%20Historical%20Perspective%20on%20the%20Modern%20AER%201990.htm
  4. Demos (2004) Report of the learning working group ‘learning to learn’. http://www.demos.co.uk/search?q=learning+to+learn. Accessed 16 May 2009
  5. FAO (2011) World aquaculture 2010. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department. Technical Paper 500(1). Rome, FAO, pp 105. http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/ba0132e/ba0132e00.htm
  6. Fleischmann K (2013) Big Bang technology: what’s next in design education, radical innovation or incremental change? J Learn Des 6(3):1–17Google Scholar
  7. Fullan M (2007) The new meaning of educational change, 4th edn. Teachers College Press, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Groff J (2013) Technology-rich innovative learning environments. OECD CERI Innovative Learning Environment projectGoogle Scholar
  9. ITL Research (2011) Innovative teaching and learning research—findings and implications. ITL Research—Innovative Teaching and LearningGoogle Scholar
  10. Joint Information Systems Committee (2008) Effective practice with e-Portfolios. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/effectivepracticeeportfolios.pdf
  11. Joint Information Systems Committee (2014) Introduction to e-Learning. http://www.jiscdigitalmedia.ac.uk/guide/introduction-to-elearning. Accessed 14 Feb 2014
  12. Katuk N, Kim JH (2013) Experience beyond knowledge: pragmatic e-learning systems design with learning experience. Comput Hum Behav 29:747–758. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Livingstone I, Matthews H (2000) Assessing and recording a skills-based curriculum. Cheltenham, Geography Discipline Network (GDN)Google Scholar
  14. MClaughlin MW, Mitra D (2001) Theory-based change and change-based theory: going deeper, going broader. J Educ Change 2(4):301–323. doi: 10.1023/A:1014616908334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nicol D, Macfarlane-Dick D (2006) Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good practice. http://www.reap.ac.uk/public/Papers/DN_SHE_Final.pdf. Accessed 10 March 2009
  16. Oblinger DG, Oblinger J L (eds) (2005) Educating the Net Generation, An Educause ebook publication. http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7101.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan 2013
  17. OECD (2010) Inspired by technology, driven by pedagogy: a systemic approach to technology-based school innovations. OECD-Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Centre for Educational Research and InnovationGoogle Scholar
  18. Palacios-Marqués D, Cortés-Grao R, Carral C (2013) Outstanding knowledge competences and web 2.0 practices for developing successful e-learning project management. Int J Project Manage 31(1):14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Peacock S, Murray S (2009) Learners’ initial expectations and experiences of ePortfolios: a pilot study. eJ Learn Teach 2(4). ISSN 1744-7747. http://bejlt.brookes.ac.uk/Brookes. Accessed 15 Jan 2014
  20. Pereira A, Mendes A, Morgado L, Amante L, Bidarra J (2008) Universidade Aberta’s Pedagogical Model for Distance Education. A University for the future. Universidade Aberta, EuropressGoogle Scholar
  21. Prensky M (2001) Digital natives, Digital immigrants part 1. Horiz  9(5):1–6Google Scholar
  22. Saadé R, Morin D, Thomas J (2012) Critical thinking in e-learning environments. Comput Hum Behav 28(5):1608–1617. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Seixas S, Bostock J, Eleftheriou M (2012) Promoting sustainable aquaculture: building the capacity of local institutions and online teaching (elearning). Manag Environ Qual 23(4):434–450. doi: 10.1108/14777831211232245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sergiovanni TJ (2000) Leadership for the schoolhouse—How is it different? Why is it important?. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  25. Shetland News (2013) Shetland’s worth £1.1 billion. http://www.shetnews.co.uk/news/6842-shet. Accessed 23 May 2013
  26. Siemens G, Tittenberge P (2009) Handbook of Emerging Technologies for Learning. http://elearnspace.org/Articles/HETL.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2013
  27. TACCLE (2009) TACCLE—teachers’ aids on creating content for learning environments: the e-learning handbook for classroom teachers. GO! onderwijs van de Vlaamse gemeenschap, Brussel, p 130Google Scholar
  28. Wang Y (2012) Education in a changing world: flexibility, skills, and employability. The World Bank, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  29. World Bank (2011) Learning for all: investing in people’s knowledge and skills to promote development. World Bank Group Education Strategy 2020, WashingtonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sónia Seixas
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sathappan Saravanan
    • 3
  • Susana Gonçalves
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidade AbertaLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences CentreUniversidade de CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  3. 3.NAFC Marine CentreShetlandScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations