Aquaculture International

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 437–448 | Cite as

Mytilus species under rope culture in Scotland: implications for management

  • P. J. Dias
  • M. Bland
  • A. M. Shanks
  • A. Beaumont
  • S. B. Piertney
  • I. M. Davies
  • M. Snow


Mussel (Mytilus spp.) production is one of the most economically important aspects of global aquaculture and, in Scotland, production has increased from 262 t in 1986 to 4,219 t in 2006. Until recently, mussel production in Scotland was considered to be based exclusively on the blue mussel Mytilus edulis, the native species. In Europe, production is known to consist of M. edulis and M. galloprovincialis, while a third less profitable species M. trossulus occurs in the Baltic Sea, where it is unexploited. In Scotland, the sympatric occurrence of M. edulis, M. trossulus, M. galloprovincialis and their hybrids in cultivation in Loch Etive has recently been reported, with significant losses in production attributed to the presence of M. trossulus. Samples of mussels were taken at three depths from 10 rope-farm sites in Loch Etive. The distribution of the Mytilus species and their hybrids in Loch Etive was investigated using the Me 15/16 nuclear DNA locus for species and hybrid identification. All three species and their hybrids were detected and the data were in agreement with the Hardy–Weinberg model suggesting panmixia. Frequencies of M. galloprovincialis and its hybrids were very low. Overall, M. trossulus (37%) was found to be more common than M. edulis (30%) and 23% of the sampled mussels were M. trossulus × M. edulis hybrids. Species distribution did not correlate with year of settlement nor with salinities taken at the time of sampling. There were significant differences in species distribution due to site location and depth, with M. edulis being more frequent at 8 m depth and M. trossulus more common at shallower depths. These differences might be exploitable in management strategies for continuing production, for example to decrease the prevalence of M. trossulus at shellfish farms in favour of the more desirable M. edulis.


Blue mussel Hybridization Loch Me 15/16 Mytilus Scotland Shellfish aquaculture 


  1. Beaumont AR, Abdul-Matin AKM, Seed R (1993) Early development, survival and growth in pure and hybrid larvae of Mytilus edulis and M. galloprovincialis. J Moll Stud 59:120–123. doi:10.1093/mollus/59.1.120-b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beaumont AR, Turner G, Wood AR, Skibinski OF (2005) Laboratory hybridizations between Mytilus species and performance of pure species and hybrid veliger larvae at lowered salinity. J Moll Stud 71(3):303–306. doi:10.1093/mollus/eyi026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaumont AR, Gjedrem T, Moran P (2007) Blue Mussel Mytilus edulis, Mediterranean mussel M. galloprovincialis. In: Svasand T, Crosetti D, Garcia-Vasquez E, Verspoor E (ed) Genetic impact of aquaculture activities in native populations. Genimpact Final Scientific Report pp 62–69Google Scholar
  4. Beaumont AR, Hawkins MP, Doig FL, Davies IM, Snow M (2008) Three species of Mytilus and their hybrids identified in a Scottish Loch: relicts, endemics and invaders? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol (in press)Google Scholar
  5. Bierne N, Borsa P, Daguin C, Jollivet D, Viard F, Bonhomme F et al (2003) Introgression patterns in the mosaic hybrid zone between Mytilus edulis and M. galloprovincialis. Mol Ecol 12:447–461. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01730.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braby CE, Somero GN (2006) Following the heart: temperature and salinity effects on heart rate in native and invasive species of blue mussels (genus Mytilus). J Exp Biol 209:2554–2566. doi:10.1242/jeb.02259 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Canadian Aquaculture R&D Review (2007) Capamara Communications Inc., Victoria, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  8. Coghlan B, Gosling E (2007) Genetic structure of hybrid mussel populations in the west of Ireland: two hypotheses revisited. Mar Biol 150:841–852. doi:10.1007/s00227-006-0408-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Comesana AS, Toro JE, Innes DJ, Thompson RJ (1999) A molecular approach to the ecology of a mussel (Mytilus edulisM. trossulus) hybrid zone on the east coast of Newfoundland, Canada. Mar Biol 133:213–221. doi:10.1007/s002270050460 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. FAO (2004) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Food and Agricultural Organization Publishing Management Service, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  11. FAO (2006) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Food and Agricultural Organization Publishing Management Service, Rome, Italy 162 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. FRS (1996) Scottish shellfish farm production survey. Fisheries Research Services, Aberdeen, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. FRS (2006) Scottish shellfish farm production survey. Fisheries Research Services, Aberdeen, UKGoogle Scholar
  14. Gosling E (1992) The mussel Mytilus: ecology, physiology, genetics and culture. Elsevier Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science, 25Google Scholar
  15. Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 76:111–117Google Scholar
  16. Hilbish TJ, Carson EW, Plante JR, Weaver LA, Gilg MR (2002) Distribution of Mytilus edulis, M. galloprovincialis and their hybrids in open-coast populations of mussels in southwestern England. Mar Biol 140(1):137–142. doi:10.1007/s002270100631 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Inoue K, Waite JH, Matsuoka M, Odo S, Harayama S (1995) Interspecific variations in adhesive protein sequences of Mytilus edulis, M. galloprovincialis and M. trossulus. Biol Bull 189:370–375. doi:10.2307/1542155 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson SB, Geller JB (2006) Larval settlement can explain the adult distribution of Mytilus californianus Conrad but not of M. galloprovincialis Lamarck or M. trossulus Gould in Moss Landing, central California: evidence from genetic identification of spat. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 328:136–145. doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2005.07.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Karayucel S, Karayucel I (2000) The effect of environmental factors, depth and position on the growth and mortality of raft-cultured blue mussels (Mytilus edulis L.). Aquac Res 31:893–899. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2109.2000.00496.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Okomus I, Stirling HP (1998) Seasonal variations in the meat weight, condition index and biochemical composition of mussels (Mytilus edulis) in suspended culture in two Scottish sea lochs. Aquaculture 159:249–261. doi:10.1016/S0044-8486(97)00206-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Penney RW, Hart MJ (1999) Distribution, genetic structure, and morphometry of Mytilus edulis and M. trossulus within a mixed species zone. J Shellfish Res 18:367–374Google Scholar
  22. Penney RW, Hart MJ, Templeman N (2002) Comparative growth of cultured blue mussels, Mytilus edulis, M. trossulus and their hybrids, in naturally occurring mixed-species stocks. Aquac Res 33:693–702. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2109.2002.00706.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Penney RW, Hart MJ, Templeman ND (2006) Genotype-dependent survival, growth, and production in cultured blue mussels Mytilus spp.: results of a reciprocal seed transfer experiment. J Shellfish Res 25:515–525. doi:10.2983/0730-8000(2006)25[515:GSGAPI]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Penney RW, Hart MJ, Templeman N (2007) Shell strength and appearance in cultured blue mussels Mytilus edulis, M. trossulus, and M. edulis × M. trossulus hybrids. North Am J Aquac 69:3281–3295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rawson PD, Hayhurst S, Vanscoyoc B (2001) Species composition of blue mussel populations in the northeastern Gulf of Maine. J Shellfish Res 20(1):31–38Google Scholar
  26. Riginos C, Cunningham CW (2005) Local adaptation and species segregation in two mussel (M. edulis × M. trossulus) hybrid zones. Mol Ecol 14:381–400. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02379.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shields JL, Barnes P, Heath DD (2008) Growth and survival differences among native, introduced and hybrid blue mussels (Mytilus spp.): genotype, environment and interaction effects. Mar Biol 154:919–928. doi:10.1007/s00227-008-0985-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Skibinski DOF, Beardmore JA, Cross TF (1983) Aspects of the population genetics of Mytilus (Mytilidae; Mollusca) in the British Isles. Biol J Linn Soc 19:137–183. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1983.tb00782.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smaal AC (2002) European mussel cultivation along the Atlantic coast: production status, problems and perspectives. Hydrobiologia 484:89–98. doi:10.1023/A:1021352904712 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smietanka B, Zbawicka M, Wolowicz M, Wenne R (2004) Mitochondrial DNA lineages in the European populations of mussels (Mytilus spp.). Mar Biol 146:79–92. doi:10.1007/s00227-004-1418-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Toro J, Innes DJ, Thompson RJ (2004) Genetic variation among life-history stages of mussels in a Mytilus edulisM. trossulus hybrid zone. Mar Biol 145:713–725Google Scholar
  32. Wonham MJ (2004) Distribution of the mediterranean mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis (bivalvia: Mytilidae) and hybrids in the Northeast Pacific. J Shellfish Res 23:535–543Google Scholar
  33. Wood AR, Beaumont AR, Skibinski DOF, Turner G (2003) Analysis of a nuclear-DNA marker for species identification of adults and larvae in the Mytilus edulis complex. J Molluscan Stud 69:61–66. doi:10.1093/mollus/69.1.61 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zardi GI, McQuaid CD, Teske PR, Barker NP (2007) Unexpected genetic structure of mussel populations in South Africa: indigenous Perna perna and invasive Mytilus galloprovincialis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 337:135–144. doi:10.3354/meps337135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. J. Dias
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Bland
    • 1
  • A. M. Shanks
    • 1
  • A. Beaumont
    • 3
  • S. B. Piertney
    • 2
  • I. M. Davies
    • 1
  • M. Snow
    • 1
  1. 1.Fisheries Research Services Marine LaboratoryAberdeenScotland
  2. 2.Institute of Biological and Environmental SciencesUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenScotland
  3. 3.School of Ocean Sciences, College of Natural SciencesBangor UniversityGwyneddUK

Personalised recommendations