Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Best among unequals? Effect of size grading and different social environments on the growth performance of juvenile Atlantic halibut

  • Published:
Aquaculture International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to study the effect of rearing juvenile halibut in different social environments, individually tagged juvenile halibut were size-graded into two size classes (Large, L, and Small, S) with ungraded fish as control. After ca 6 weeks, the two size-graded groups were again graded into two size classes creating four experimental groups: Large of the Large (LL), Small of the Large (SL), Large of the Small (LS), and Small of the Small (SS). Grading (overall mean of the four grading groups) improved growth rate by 10% compared with ungraded controls, but the effect was also significantly affected by social environments, because in the latter half of the experiment overall growth was improved by 11 and 12% in the two groups with larger size variation (i.e. SL and LS, respectively) compared with the two other groups (i.e. LL and SS). Significant size rank correlations were maintained during the experiment, these were higher in the ungraded (Control) group and the SS and LL groups than in the SL and LS groups. Further, the degree of mean rank position changes varied between the experimental groups and was higher in the SL (20.7) and LS (25.6) groups than in the Control (10.5), LL (15.1), and SS (15.4) groups. This could possibly indicate a stronger social hierarchy in the last three groups. Growth rate differences may be the product of different degrees of interactions among individuals, and based on the higher overall growth rates in the groups with larger size variation (i.e. SL, LS) it is concluded that juvenile halibut should not be too intensively size graded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aune A, Imsl AK, Pittman K (1997) Growth of juvenile halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus L.) under a constant and switched temperature regime. Aquac Res 28:931–939. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.1997.tb01018.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baardvik BM, Jobling M (1990) Effect of size-sorting on biomass gain and individual growth rates in Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus L. Aquaculture 90:11–16. doi:10.1016/0044-8486(90)90278-U

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers RC, Miller TJ (1995) Evaluating fish growth by means of otolith increment analysis: special properties of individual-level longitudinal data. In: Secor DH, Dean JM, Campana SE (eds) Recent developments in fish otolith research. University of South Carolina Press, Colombia, SC, USA, pp 155–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle RW, Talbot AJ (1986) Artificial selection on growth and correlated selection on competitive behaviour in fish. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 43:1059–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallaråker H, Folkvord A, Stefansson SO (1995) Growth of juvenile halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) related to temperature, light period and feeding regime. Neth J Sea Res 34:139–147. doi:10.1016/0077-7579(95)90022-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntingford FA, Metcalfe NB, Thorpe JE, Graham WD, Adams CE (1990) Social dominance and body size in Atlantic salmon parr, Salmo salar L. J Fish Biol 36:877–881. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1990.tb05635.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imsland AK, Nilsen T, Folkvord A (1998) Stochastic simulation of size-variation in turbot: possible causes analysed with an individual based model. J Fish Biol 53:237–258. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1998.tb00978.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jobling M (1982) Some observations on the effects of feeding frequency on the food intake and growth of plaice, Pleuronectes platessa L. J Fish Biol 20:431–444. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1982.tb03936.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jobling M (1995) Simple indices for the assessment of the influences of social environment on growth performance, exemplified by studies on Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus). Aquac Int 3:60–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobling M, Koskela J (1996) Interindividual variations in feeding and growth in rainbow trout during restricted feeding and in a subsequent period of compensatory growth. J Fish Biol 49:658–667. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1996.tb00062.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jobling M, Baardvik BM, Christiansen B (1991) Does size-grading of farmed fish pay off? (Lønner det seg å sortere oppdrettsfisken?). Nor Fiskeoppdrett 16(15):32–33 in Norwegian

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobling M, Jørgensen EH, Arnesen AM, Ringø E (1993) Feeding, growth and environmental requirements of Arctic charr: a review of aquaculture potential. Aquac Int 1:20–46. doi:10.1007/BF00692662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen TM, Imsland AK, Stefansson SO (1999) The interaction of temperature and size on growth of juvenile Atlantic halibut. J Fish Biol 54:556–572. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1999.tb00635.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamstra A (1993) The effect of size grading on individual growth in eel, Anguilla anguilla, measured by individual marking. Aquaculture 112:67–77. doi:10.1016/0044-8486(93)90159-V

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy ID, Carter CG, Houlihan DF (1992) The effect of feeding hierarchy on individual variability in daily feeding of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchyus mykiss (Walbaum). J Fish Biol 41:257–263. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1992.tb02655.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle SR, Casella G, McCulloch CE (1992) Variance components. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stefánsson MÖ, Imsland AK, Jenssen MD, Jonassen TM, Stefansson SO, FitzGerald R (2000) The effect of different initial size distributions on the growth of Atlantic halibut. J Fish Biol 56:826–836. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb00875.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunde LM, Imsland AK, Folkvord A, Stefansson SO (1998) Effects of size grading on growth and survival of juvenile turbot reared at two temperatures. Aquac Int 6:19–32. doi:10.1023/A:1009265602388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timm NH (1980) Multivariate analysis of variance of repeated measurements. In: Krishnaiah PR (ed) Handbook of statistics, vol 1. Analysis of variance. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp 41–87.

  • Wallace JC, Kolbeinshavn AG (1988) The effect of size grading on subsequent growth in fingerling Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus (L.). Aquaculture 73:101–110. doi:10.1016/0044-8486(88)90045-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, NJ, p 718

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was financed by the Norwegian Research Council (Contract: 110993/120).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert K. Imsland.

Additional information

Imsland and Jenssen have contributed equally.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Imsland, A.K., Jenssen, M.D., Jonassen, T.M. et al. Best among unequals? Effect of size grading and different social environments on the growth performance of juvenile Atlantic halibut. Aquacult Int 17, 217–227 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-008-9193-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-008-9193-7

Keywords