Abstract
In order to study the effect of rearing juvenile halibut in different social environments, individually tagged juvenile halibut were size-graded into two size classes (Large, L, and Small, S) with ungraded fish as control. After ca 6 weeks, the two size-graded groups were again graded into two size classes creating four experimental groups: Large of the Large (LL), Small of the Large (SL), Large of the Small (LS), and Small of the Small (SS). Grading (overall mean of the four grading groups) improved growth rate by 10% compared with ungraded controls, but the effect was also significantly affected by social environments, because in the latter half of the experiment overall growth was improved by 11 and 12% in the two groups with larger size variation (i.e. SL and LS, respectively) compared with the two other groups (i.e. LL and SS). Significant size rank correlations were maintained during the experiment, these were higher in the ungraded (Control) group and the SS and LL groups than in the SL and LS groups. Further, the degree of mean rank position changes varied between the experimental groups and was higher in the SL (20.7) and LS (25.6) groups than in the Control (10.5), LL (15.1), and SS (15.4) groups. This could possibly indicate a stronger social hierarchy in the last three groups. Growth rate differences may be the product of different degrees of interactions among individuals, and based on the higher overall growth rates in the groups with larger size variation (i.e. SL, LS) it is concluded that juvenile halibut should not be too intensively size graded.


Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aune A, Imsl AK, Pittman K (1997) Growth of juvenile halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus L.) under a constant and switched temperature regime. Aquac Res 28:931–939. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.1997.tb01018.x
Baardvik BM, Jobling M (1990) Effect of size-sorting on biomass gain and individual growth rates in Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus L. Aquaculture 90:11–16. doi:10.1016/0044-8486(90)90278-U
Chambers RC, Miller TJ (1995) Evaluating fish growth by means of otolith increment analysis: special properties of individual-level longitudinal data. In: Secor DH, Dean JM, Campana SE (eds) Recent developments in fish otolith research. University of South Carolina Press, Colombia, SC, USA, pp 155–175
Doyle RW, Talbot AJ (1986) Artificial selection on growth and correlated selection on competitive behaviour in fish. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 43:1059–1064
Hallaråker H, Folkvord A, Stefansson SO (1995) Growth of juvenile halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) related to temperature, light period and feeding regime. Neth J Sea Res 34:139–147. doi:10.1016/0077-7579(95)90022-5
Huntingford FA, Metcalfe NB, Thorpe JE, Graham WD, Adams CE (1990) Social dominance and body size in Atlantic salmon parr, Salmo salar L. J Fish Biol 36:877–881. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1990.tb05635.x
Imsland AK, Nilsen T, Folkvord A (1998) Stochastic simulation of size-variation in turbot: possible causes analysed with an individual based model. J Fish Biol 53:237–258. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1998.tb00978.x
Jobling M (1982) Some observations on the effects of feeding frequency on the food intake and growth of plaice, Pleuronectes platessa L. J Fish Biol 20:431–444. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1982.tb03936.x
Jobling M (1995) Simple indices for the assessment of the influences of social environment on growth performance, exemplified by studies on Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus). Aquac Int 3:60–65
Jobling M, Koskela J (1996) Interindividual variations in feeding and growth in rainbow trout during restricted feeding and in a subsequent period of compensatory growth. J Fish Biol 49:658–667. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1996.tb00062.x
Jobling M, Baardvik BM, Christiansen B (1991) Does size-grading of farmed fish pay off? (Lønner det seg å sortere oppdrettsfisken?). Nor Fiskeoppdrett 16(15):32–33 in Norwegian
Jobling M, Jørgensen EH, Arnesen AM, Ringø E (1993) Feeding, growth and environmental requirements of Arctic charr: a review of aquaculture potential. Aquac Int 1:20–46. doi:10.1007/BF00692662
Jonassen TM, Imsland AK, Stefansson SO (1999) The interaction of temperature and size on growth of juvenile Atlantic halibut. J Fish Biol 54:556–572. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1999.tb00635.x
Kamstra A (1993) The effect of size grading on individual growth in eel, Anguilla anguilla, measured by individual marking. Aquaculture 112:67–77. doi:10.1016/0044-8486(93)90159-V
McCarthy ID, Carter CG, Houlihan DF (1992) The effect of feeding hierarchy on individual variability in daily feeding of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchyus mykiss (Walbaum). J Fish Biol 41:257–263. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1992.tb02655.x
Searle SR, Casella G, McCulloch CE (1992) Variance components. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA
Stefánsson MÖ, Imsland AK, Jenssen MD, Jonassen TM, Stefansson SO, FitzGerald R (2000) The effect of different initial size distributions on the growth of Atlantic halibut. J Fish Biol 56:826–836. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb00875.x
Sunde LM, Imsland AK, Folkvord A, Stefansson SO (1998) Effects of size grading on growth and survival of juvenile turbot reared at two temperatures. Aquac Int 6:19–32. doi:10.1023/A:1009265602388
Timm NH (1980) Multivariate analysis of variance of repeated measurements. In: Krishnaiah PR (ed) Handbook of statistics, vol 1. Analysis of variance. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp 41–87.
Wallace JC, Kolbeinshavn AG (1988) The effect of size grading on subsequent growth in fingerling Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus (L.). Aquaculture 73:101–110. doi:10.1016/0044-8486(88)90045-2
Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, NJ, p 718
Acknowledgments
This study was financed by the Norwegian Research Council (Contract: 110993/120).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Imsland and Jenssen have contributed equally.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Imsland, A.K., Jenssen, M.D., Jonassen, T.M. et al. Best among unequals? Effect of size grading and different social environments on the growth performance of juvenile Atlantic halibut. Aquacult Int 17, 217–227 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-008-9193-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-008-9193-7


