Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Horizontally integrated aquaculture development: Exploring consensus on constraints and opportunities with a stakeholder Delphi

  • Published:
Aquaculture International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Horizontal integration represents a technically viable opportunity for aquaculture producers to reduce environmental impacts whilst apparently enhancing production efficiency and gaining from economies of integration. Despite significant research, pilot-scale developments and recommendations advocating adoption by producers, uptake has been limited. Consequently, research was undertaken, invoking the iterative Delphi methodology, to explore consensus amongst a multidisciplinary stakeholder panel concerning the nature and significance of constraints and opportunities associated with horizontal integration. Round 1 participants (n = 24) submitted 84 and 94 statements identifying constraints and opportunities, respectively, within physical, environmental, managerial, institutional, economic and social subcategories; aggregating similar statements produced 29 distinct constraints and 27 opportunities for subsequent evaluation. Friedman’s randomised block analysis indicated similar rank patterns (P < 0.001, two-tailed) in the distribution of weights assigned to opportunities and constraints by panel members after round 3. Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (W) indicated that agreement on constraints was ‘strong’ and confidence in rank patterns ‘high’; agreement was ‘very strong’ and confidence ‘high’ to ‘unusually high’ concerning opportunities. Agreement within subcategories ranged from ‘unusually high’ for physical and environmental constraints and opportunities to ‘moderate’ for institutional and social constraints. Economic, physical and managerial constraints were ranked highest, as compared with environmental and physical opportunities. These findings confirm that constraints and opportunities associated with horizontal integration are multifaceted and that a multidisciplinary, systems-based approach to aquaculture development is critical. Furthermore, the stakeholder Delphi constitutes a promising approach to facilitating constructive dialogue and consensus-building amongst diverse, antagonistic and hierarchical stakeholder groups frequently associated with aquaculture development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berg H, Michelsen P, Troell M, Folke C, Kautsky N (1996) Managing aquaculture for sustainability in tropical Lake Kariba, Zimbabwe. Ecolog Econ 18:141–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge MCM (1996) Cage aquaculture, 2nd edn. Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science

  • Beveridge MCM, Phillips MJ, Macintosh DJ (1997) Aquaculture and the environment: the supply and demand for environmental goods and services by Asian aquaculture and the implications for sustainability. Aquacult Res 28:797–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd CE (1999) Aquaculture sustainability and environmental issues. J World Aquacult Soc 30(2):10–13, 71–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunting SW (2001a) Appropriation of environmental goods and services by aquaculture: a reassessment employing the ecological footprint methodology and implications for horizontal integration. Aquacult Res 32:605–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunting SW (2001b) A design and management approach for horizontally integrated aquaculture systems. PhD thesis, University of Stirling, UK

  • Bunting SW (2005a) Bioeconomic modelling: operations guide and temperate and warmwater GENESIS system case studies. Report to the European Commission funded GENESIS Project (Contract: INNOVATION-IPS-2000-102). University of Stirling, UK

  • Bunting SW (2005b) Second market analysis. Report to the European Commission funded GENESIS Project (Contract: INNOVATION-IPS-2000-102). University of Stirling, UK

  • Bunting SW (2007) Confronting the realities of wastewater aquaculture in peri-urban Kolkata with bioeconomic modelling. Water Res 41:499–505

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bunting SW, Bostock JC, Lefebvre S, Muir JF (2003) Assessing prospects for horizontally integrated aquaculture using bioeconomic modelling. In: Chopin T, Reinertsen H (eds) Aquaculture Europe ‘06—beyond monoculture. European Aquaculture Society, Special Publication 33, Bredene, Belgium, pp 140–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Caffey RH (1998) Quantifying sustainability in aquaculture production. PhD thesis, School of Forestry, Wildlife, and Fisheries, Louisiana State University, Louisiana

  • Chopin T, Reinertsen H (eds) (2003) Aquaculture Europe ‘06—beyond monoculture. European Aquaculture Society, Special Publication 33, Bredene, Belgium, p 408

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook EJ, Black KD, Sayer MDJ (2003) In situ bio-filters at commercial salmon farms in Scotland—how effective are mussel lines as biological filters? In: Chopin T, Reinertsen H (eds) Aquaculture Europe ‘06—beyond monoculture. European Aquaculture Society, Special Publication 33, Bredene, Belgium, pp 148–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Corea A, Johnstone R, Jayasinghe J, Ekaratne S, Jayawardene K (1998) Self-pollution: a major threat to the prawn farming industry in Sri Lanka. Ambio 27:662–668

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002) A strategy for the sustainable development of European aquaculture. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1995) Code of conduct for responsible fisheries. UN Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson P, Stone T, Young JA (2005) Consumer perceptions of aquatic products to be produced from GENESIS integrated systems: the UK perspective. Department of Marketing and Stirling Aquaculture, University of Stirling, Scotland

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Kautsky N, Berg H, Jansson A, Troell M (1998) The ecological footprint concept for sustainable seafood production: a review. Ecol Appl 8:63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of South Australia (2007) Australian aquaculture code of conduct. http://www.pir.sa.gov.au/byteserve/aquaculture/farm_practice/code_of_conduct.pdf. Cited 28 Feb 2007

  • Halling C, Aroca G, Cifuentes M, Buschmann AH, Troell M (2005) Comparison of spore inoculated and vegetative propagated cultivation methods of Gracilaria chilensis in an integrated seaweed and fish cage culture. Aquacult Int 13:409–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H (2000) Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs 32:1008–1015

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kautsky N, Berg H, Folke C, Larsson J, Troell M (1997) Ecological footprint for assessment of resource use and development limitations in shrimp and tilapia aquaculture. Aquacult Res 28:753–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre S, Probert I, Lefrancois C, Hussenot J (2004) Outdoor phytoplankton continuous culture in a marine fish-phytoplankton-bivalve integrated system: combined effects of dilution rate and ambient conditions on growth rate, biomass and nutrient cycling. Aquaculture 240:211–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow J (1975) Delphi inquiries and knowledge utilization. In: Linstone HA, Turoff M (eds) The Delphi method. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir JF (1996) A systems approach to aquaculture and environmental management. In: Baird DJ, Beveridge MCM, Kelly LA, Muir JF (eds) Aquaculture and water resource management. Blackwell Science, London

    Google Scholar 

  • NACA/FAO (2000) Aquaculture development beyond 2000: the Bangkok declaration and strategy. Conference on Aquaculture in the Third Millennium, Bangkok, 20–25 February 2000. NACA, Bangkok and FAO, Rome

  • Naturland (2005) Naturland standards for organic aquaculture. Naturland, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Neori A, Chopin T, Troell M, Buschmann AH, Kraemer GP, Halling C, Shpigel M, Yarrish C (2004) Integrated aquaculture: rationale, evolution and state of the art emphasizing seaweed biofiltration in modern mariculture. Aquaculture 231:361–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New Scientist (1999) Forget the shellfish. New Sci 163(2197):5

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt RC (1997) Managing Delphi surveys using nonparametric statistical techniques. Decision Sci 28:763–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Executive (2003) A strategic framework for Scottish aquaculture. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2003/03/16842/20516. Cited 28 Feb 2007

  • Shetland Islands Council (2003) Develop new mussel farm, Lunga Skerries, south of Weisdale Voe. Works licence application 2003/147/NS. http://www.shetland.gov.uk/coins/commpdfs/Public/1548.pdf. Cited 28 Feb 2007

  • Shpigel M, Neori A (1996) The integrated culture of seaweed, abalone, fish and clams in modular intensive land-based systems: I. proportions of size and projected revenues. Aquacult Eng 15:313–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shpigel M, Gasith A, Kimmel E (1997) A biomechanical filter for treating fish-pond effluents. Aquaculture 152:103–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spedding CRW (1988) An Introduction to Agricultural Systems. Elsevier, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumsion T (1998) The Delphi technique: an adaptive research tool. Br J Occup Ther 61(4):153–156

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2003) The promise of a blue revolution. The Economist 368(8336):19–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Troell M, Halling C, Nilsson A, Buschmann AH, Kautsky N, Kautsky L (1997) Integrated marine cultivation of Gracilaria chilensis (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta) and salmon cages for reduced environmental impacts and increased economic output. Aquaculture 156:45–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN (1992) Rio declaration on environment and development. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID (2005) Livelihoods & conflict: a toolkit for programming. US Agency for International Development, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmarsh DJ, Cook EJ, Black KD (2006) Searching for sustainability in aquaculture: an investigation into the economic prospects for an integrated salmon-mussel production system. Mar Policy 30:293–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WWF (2003) Intensive marine fish aquaculture. WWF Position Paper. http://assets.panda.org/downloads/wwfaquaculturepolicyfinaljuly2003.doc. Cited 28 Feb 2007

Download references

Acknowledgement

The contribution of the participants was greatly appreciated, as was correspondence with Dr Caffey and guidance from my supervisors Professor James Muir and Dr Malcolm Beveridge. This publication is based on research supported by a Technology Foresight Studentship from the University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland. Comments on earlier drafts by two anonymous reviewers were greatly appreciated. Subsequent revision was supported by the EC INCO-DEV MANGROVE project which received research funding from the European Community’s Sixth Framework Programme (contract INCO-CT-2005-003697). This publication reflects the author’s views and the European Community is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained herein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, Centre for Environment and Society, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex, CO4 3SQ, UK

    Stuart W. Bunting

Authors
  1. Stuart W. Bunting
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart W. Bunting.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bunting, S.W. Horizontally integrated aquaculture development: Exploring consensus on constraints and opportunities with a stakeholder Delphi. Aquacult Int 16, 153–169 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-007-9134-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-007-9134-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation