Aquatic Geochemistry

, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 775–807 | Cite as

Arsenic and Antimony in Groundwater Flow Systems: A Comparative Study

  • Stephanie S. Willis
  • Shama E. Haque
  • Karen H. Johannesson
Original Paper

Abstract

Arsenic (As) and antimony (Sb) concentrations and speciation were determined along flow paths in three groundwater flow systems, the Carrizo Sand aquifer in southeastern Texas, the Upper Floridan aquifer in south-central Florida, and the Aquia aquifer of coastal Maryland, and subsequently compared and contrasted. Previously reported hydrogeochemical parameters for all three aquifer were used to demonstrate how changes in oxidation–reduction conditions and solution chemistry along the flow paths in each of the aquifers affected the concentrations of As and Sb. Total Sb concentrations (SbT) of groundwaters from the Carrizo Sand aquifer range from 16 to 198 pmol kg−1; in the Upper Floridan aquifer, SbT concentrations range from 8.1 to 1,462 pmol kg−1; and for the Aquia aquifer, SbT concentrations range between 23 and 512 pmol kg−1. In each aquifer, As and Sb (except for the Carrizo Sand aquifer) concentrations are highest in the regions where Fe(III) reduction predominates and lower where SO4 reduction buffers redox conditions. Groundwater data and sequential analysis of the aquifer sediments indicate that reductive dissolution of Fe(III) oxides/oxyhydroxides and subsequent release of sorbed As and Sb are the principal mechanism by which these metalloids are mobilized. Increases in pH along the flow path in the Carrizo Sand and Aquia aquifer also likely promote desorption of As and Sb from mineral surfaces, whereas pyrite oxidation mobilizes As and Sb within oxic groundwaters from the recharge zone of the Upper Floridan aquifer. Both metalloids are subsequently removed from solution by readsorption and/or coprecipitation onto Fe(III) oxides/oxyhydroxides and mixed Fe(II)/Fe(III) oxides, clay minerals, and pyrite. Speciation modeling using measured and computed Eh values predicts that Sb(III) predominate in Carrizo Sand and Upper Floridan aquifer groundwaters, occurring as the Sb(OH)30 species in solution. In oxic groundwaters from the recharge zones of these aquifers, the speciation model suggests that Sb(V) occurs as the negatively charged Sb(OH)6 species, whereas in sufidic groundwaters from both aquifers, the thioantimonite species, HSb2S4 and Sb2S42−, are predicted to be important dissolved forms of Sb. The measured As and Sb speciation in the Aquia aquifer indicates that As(III) and Sb(III) predominate. Comparison of the speciation model results based on measured Eh values, and those computed with the Fe(II)/Fe(III), S(-II)/SO4, As(III)/As(V), and Sb(III)/Sb(V) couples, to the analytically determined As and Sb speciation suggests that the Fe(II)/Fe(III), S(-II)/SO4 couples exert more control on the in situ redox condition of these groundwaters than either metalloid redox couple.

Keywords

Arsenic Antimony Groundwater Carrizo Sand Upper Floridan Aquia 

Supplementary material

10498_2011_9131_MOESM1_ESM.doc (164 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 164 kb)

References

  1. Aeschbach-Hertig W, Stute M, Clark M, Reuter RF, Scholosser P (2002) A Paleotemperature record derived from dissolved noble gases in groundwater of the Aquia aquifer (Maryland, USA). Geochim Cosmochim Acta 66:797–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander WH, White DE (1966) Ground-water resources of Atascosa and Frio Counties, Texas. Texas Water Development Board, Rep. 32, 211 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson LD, Kent DB, Davis JA (1994) Batch experiment characterizing the reduction of Cr(VI) using suboxic material from a mildly reducing sand and gravel aquifer. Environ Sci Technol 28:178–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Appelo CAJ (1994) Cation and proton exchange, pH variations, and carbonate reactions in a freshening aquifer. Water Resour Res 30:2793–2805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Appelo CAJ, Postma D (2005) Geochemistry, groundwater and pollution, 2nd edn. Balkema, LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Appelo CAJ, van der Weiden MJJ, Tournassat C, Charlet L (2002) Surface complexation of ferrous iron and carbonate on ferrihydrite and mobilization of arsenic. Environ Sci Technol 36:3096–3103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Back W, Hanshaw BB (1970) Comparison of chemical hydrogeology of the carbonate peninsulas of Florida and Yucatan. J Hydrol 10:330–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Basu R, Haque SE, Tang J, Ji J, Johannesson KH (2007) Evolution of selenium concentrations and speciation in groundwater flow systems: Upper Floridan (Florida) and Carrizo Sand (Texas) aquifers. Chem Geol 246:147–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bencze K (1994) Antimony. In: Seiler HG, Sigel A, Sigel H (eds) Handbook on metals in clinical and analytical chemistry. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 227–236Google Scholar
  10. Berner RA (1981) A new geochemical classification of sedimentary environments. J. Sediment. Petrol. 51:359–365Google Scholar
  11. Bertine KK, Lee DS (1983) Antimony content and speciation in the water column and interstitial waters of Saanich Inlet. In: Wong CS, Boyle EA, Bruland KW, Burton JD, Goldberg ED (eds) Trace metals in seawater. Plenum, New York, pp 21–38Google Scholar
  12. Bethke CM (2008) Geochemical and biogeochemical reaction modeling. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Bhattacharya P, Chatterjee D, Jacks G (1997) Occurrence of arsenic-contaminated groundwater in alluvial aquifers of the Delta Plain, eastern India: options for a safe drinking water supply. Water Res Dev 13:79–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bhattacharya P, Jacks G, Ahmed KM, Khan AA, Routh J (2002) Arsenic in groundwater of the Bengal Plain aquifers in Bangladesh. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 69:538–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bostick BC, Fendorf S (2003) Arsenite sorption to triolite (FeS) and pyrite (FeS2). Geochim Cosmochim Acta 67:909–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bostick BC, Fendorf S, Manning BA (2003) Arsenite adsorption on galena (PbS) and sphalerite (ZnS). Geochim Cosmochim Acta 67:895–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brookins DG (1986) Geochemical behavior of antimony, arsenic, cadmium and thallium: Eh-pH diagrams for 25°C, 1-bar pressure. Chem Geol 54:271–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bush PW, Johnston RH (1988) Ground water hydraulics, regional flow, and ground-water development of the Floridan aquifer system in Florida and parts of Georgia, South Carolina, and Alabama. U. S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 1403-CGoogle Scholar
  19. Byrd JT (1990) Comparative geochemistries of arsenic and antimony in rivers and estuaries. Sci Total Environ 97(98):301–314Google Scholar
  20. Castro MC (2004) Helium sources in passive margin aquifers—new evidence for a significant mantle 3He source in aquifers with unexpectedly low in situ 3He/4He production. Earth Planet Sci Lett 222:897–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Castro MC, Goblet P (2003) Calibration of regional groundwater flow models: working toward a better understanding of site-specific systems. Water Resour Res 39(6):1172. doi:10.1029/2002WR001653 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Castro MC, Goblet P (2005) Calculation of ground water ages—a comparative analysis. Ground Water 43:368–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Castro MC, Stute M, Schlosser P (2000) Comparison of 4He ages and 14C ages in simple aquifer systems: implications for groundwater flow and chronologies. Appl Geochem 15:1137–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chapelle FH (1983) Ground-water geochemistry and calcite cementation of the Aquia aquifer in southern Maryland. Water Resour Res 19:545–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chapelle FH, Knobel LL (1983) Aqueous geochemistry and the exchangeable cation composition of glauconite in the Aquia aquifer, Maryland. Ground Water 21:343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chapelle FH, Knobel LL (1985) Stable carbon isotopes of biocarbonate in the Aquia aquifer, Maryland—evidence for an isotopically heavy source of carbon dioxide. Ground Water 21:343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chowdhury TR, Basu GK, Mandal BK, Biswas BK, Samanta G, Chowdhury UK, Chanda CR, Lodh D, Saha KC, Roy S, Kabir S, Quamruzzaman Q, Chakraborti D (1999) Arsenic poisoning in the Ganges delta. Nature 401:545–546Google Scholar
  28. Cloy JM, Farmer JG, Graham MC, MacKenzie AB (2009) Retention of As and Sb in ombrotrophic peat bogs: records of As, Sb, and Pb deposition at four Scottish sites. Environ Sci Technol 43:1756–1762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Council of the European Communities (1976) Council Directive 76/464/EEC of 4 May 1976 on pollution caused by certain dangerous substances discharged into the aquatic environment of the Community. Official journal L 129, 18/05/1976, pp 23–29Google Scholar
  30. Council of the European Union (1998) Council Directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption. Official Journal L 330, 05/12/1998, pp 32–54Google Scholar
  31. Cowart JR, Osmond JK (1977) Uranium isotopes in groundwater: their use in prospecting for sandstone-type uranium deposits. J Geochem Explor 8:365–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Crececlius EA, Bothner MH, Carpenter R (1975) Geochemistries of arsenic antimony, mercury, and related elements in sediments of Puget Sound. Environ Sci Technol 9:325–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Cummings DE, Caccavo F Jr, Fendorf S, Rosenzweif RF (1999) Arsenic mobilization by the dissimilatory Fe(III)-reducing bacterium Shewanella alga BrY. Environ Sci Technol 33:723–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Cutter GA (1991) Dissolved arsenic and antimony in the Black Sea. Deep-Sea Res 38:S825–S843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Cutter GA, Cutter LS (1995) Behavior of dissolved antimony, arsenic, and selenium in the Atlantic Ocean. Mar Chem 49:295–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Cutter GA, Cutter LS (1998) Metalloids in the high latitude North Atlantic Ocean: sources and internal cycling. Mar Chem 61:25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Cutter GA, Cutter LS, Featherstone AM, Lohrenz SE (2001) Antimony and arsenic biogeochemistry in the western Atlantic Ocean. Deep-Sea Res II 48:2895–2915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Dai Z, Samper J (2006) Inverse modeling of water flow and multicomponent reactive transport in coastal aquifer systems. J Hydrol 327:447–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Das D, Chatterjee A, Mandal BK, Samanta G, Chakroborti D, Chanda B (1995) Arsenic in ground-water in 6 districts of West Bengal, India—the biggest arsenic calmanity in the world. 2. Arsenic concentrations in drinking-water, hair, nails, urine, skin-scale and liver-tissue (biopsy) of the affected people. Analyst 120:917–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Dave H, Johannesson KH (2008a) Geochemistry of tungsten in groundwater flow systems. Geol Soc Am Abstr Progr 40(6):341Google Scholar
  41. Dave H, Johannesson KH (2008b) An initial examination of tungsten geochemistry along groundwater flow paths. Eos Trans., AGU, 89(53) Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract B21B-0352Google Scholar
  42. Delany JM, Lundeen SR (1990) The LLNL thermochemical database. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report UCRL-21658. Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  43. Dia Z, Samper J, Ritzi R Jr (2006) Identifying geochemical processes by inverse modeling of multicomponent reactive transport in the Aquia aquifer. Geosphere 2:210–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Dixit S, Hering JG (2003) Comparison of arsenic (V) and arsenic (III) sorption to iron oxide minerals: implications for arsenic mobility. Environ Sci Technol 37:4182–4189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Dowling CB, Poreda RJ, Basu AR, Peters SL, Aggarwal PK (2002) Geochemical study of arsenic release mechanisms in the Bengal Basin groundwater. Water Resour Res 38:1173. doi:10.1029/2001/WR000968 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Drever JI (1988) The geochemistry of natural waters, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  47. Drummond DD (2001) Hydrogeology of the Coastal Plain aquifer system in Queen Anne’s and Talbot Counties, Maryland, with a discussion of brackish-water intrusion in the Aquia aquifer. Maryland Geological Survey, Report of Investigations 72Google Scholar
  48. Drummond DD (2007) Water-supply potential of the Coastal Plain aquifers in Calvert, Charles, and St. Mary’s Counties, Maryland, with emphasis on the upper Patapsco and lower Patapsco aquifers. Maryland Geological Survey, Report of Investigations 76Google Scholar
  49. Drummond DD, Bolton DW (2010) Arsenic in ground water in the Coastal Plain aquifers of Maryland. Maryland Geological Survey, Report of Investigations 78Google Scholar
  50. Dutton AR, Nicot J-P, Kier KS (2006) Hydrodynamic convergence of hydropressured and geopressured zones, Central Texas, Gulf of Mexico Basin, USA. Hydrogeol J 14:859–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Dzombak DA, Morel FMM (1990) Surface complexation modeling: hydrous ferric oxide. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE (eds) (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 3-67-68Google Scholar
  53. Filella M, May PM (2003) Computer simulation of the low-molecular-weight inorganic species distribution of antimony(III) and antimony(V) in natural waters. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 67:4013–4031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Filella M, Belzile N, Chen Y-W (2002a) Antimony in the environment: a review focused on natural waters I. Occur Earth-Sci Rev 57:125–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Filella M, Belzile N, Chen Y-W (2002b) Antimony in the environment: a review focused on natural waters II. Relevant solution chemistry. Earth-Sci Rev 59:265–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Fuller C, Davis J, Waychunas G (1992) Surface chemistry of ferrihydrite: part 2. Kinetics of arsenate adsorption and coprecipitation. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 57:2271–2281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Gebel T (1997) Arsenic and antimony: comparative approach on mechanistic toxicology. Chem Biol Interact 107:131–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Gebel T (1998) Suppression of arsenic-induced chromosome mutagenicity by antimony in V79 cells. Mutat Res 412:213–218Google Scholar
  59. Gebel T (2000) Confounding variables in the environmental toxicity of arsenic. Toxicol 144:155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Gilbert TW, Behymer TD, Castaneda HB (1982) Determination of dissolved oxygen in natural and wastewaters. Am Lab 14:119–134Google Scholar
  61. Goldberg S (2002) Competitive adsorption of arsenate and arsenite on oxides and clay minerals. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52:1287–1300Google Scholar
  62. Grenthe I, Stumm W, Laaksuharju M, Nilsson A-C, Wikberg P (1992) Redox potentials and redox reactions in deep groundwater systems. Chem Geol 98:138–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Hach (2004) The handbook DR/2400 portable spectrophotometer procedure, USAGoogle Scholar
  64. Hamlin HS (1988) Depositional and ground-water flow systems of the Carrizo-Upper Wilcox, South Texas. The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, Report of Investigations No. 175, 61 ppGoogle Scholar
  65. Hansen HJ (1974) Sedimentary facies of the Aquia formation in the subsurface of the Maryland Coastal Plain. Maryland Geological Survey Report of Investigations 21Google Scholar
  66. Hanshaw BB, Back W, Rubin M (1965a) Radiocarbon determinations for estimating groundwater flow velocities in central Florida. Science 148:494–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Hanshaw BB, Back W, Rubin M (1965b) Carbonate equilibria and radiocarbon distribution related to groundwater flow in the Floridan Limestone aquifer, U.S.A. Hydrology of Fractured Rocks, vol. 1. In: Proceeding of the Dubrovnik Symposium, International Association of Scientific Hydrology. UNESCO, pp 601–614Google Scholar
  68. Haque SE (2007) Hydrogeochemical evolution of arsenic along groundwater flow paths: linking aqueous and solid phase arsenic speciation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas, Arlington, 145 pGoogle Scholar
  69. Haque S, Johannesson KH (2006a) Arsenic concentrations and speciation along a groundwater flow path: the Carrizo Sand aquifer, Texas, USA. Chem Geol 228:57–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Haque SE, Johannesson KH (2006b) Concentrations and speciation of arsenic along a groundwater flow-path in the Upper Floridan aquifer, Florida, USA. Environ Geol 50:219–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Haque SE, Johannesson KH (2007) Arsenic and antimony in groundwater flow systems. Geol Soc Am Abstr Progr 39:517Google Scholar
  72. Haque SE, Ji J, Johannesson KH (2008) Evaluating mobilization and transport of arsenic in sediments and groundwaters of Aquia aquifer, Maryland, USA. J Contam Hydrol 99:68–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Harmon RE, Lombi E, Fortunati P, Nolan AL, McLaughlin MJ (2004) Coupling speciation and isotope dilution techniques to study arsenic mobilization in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 38:1794–1798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Harsh JF, Laczniak RJ (1990) Conceptualization and analysis of groundwater flow system in the Coastal Plain of Virginia and adjacent parts of Maryland and North Carolina. U. S. Geol. Surv. Professional Pap. 1404F, p 100Google Scholar
  75. Harvey CF, Swartz CH, Badruzzaman ABM, Keon-Blute N, Yu W, Ali MA, Jay J, Beckie R, Niedan V, Brabander D, Oates PM, Ashfaque KN, Islam S, Hemond HF, Ahmed MF (2002) Arsenic mobility and groundwater extraction in Bangladesh. Science 298:1602–1606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Helz GR, Tossell JA (2008) Thermodynamic model for arsenic speciation in sulfidic waters: a novel use of ab initio computations. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 72:4457–4468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Hughes MF (2002) Arsenic toxicity and potential mechanisms of action. Toxicol Lett 133:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Hughes MF, Thomas DJ, Kenyon EM (2009) Toxicology and epidemiology of arsenic and its compounds. In: Henke KR (ed) Arsenic: environmental chemistry, health threats and waste treatment. Wiley, Chichester, pp 237–275Google Scholar
  79. Inskeep WP, McDermott TR, Fendorf S (2002) Arsenic (V)/(III) cycling in soils and natural waters: chemical and microbiological processes. In: Frankenberger WT Jr (ed) Environmental chemistry of arsenic. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 183–215Google Scholar
  80. Islam F, Gault A, Boothman C, Polya D, Charnock J, Chatterjee D, Lyond J (2004) Role of metal-reducing bacteria in arsenic release from Bengal delta sediments. Nature 430:68–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Jay JA, Blute NK, Hemond HF, Durant JL (2004) Arsenic-sulfides confound anion exchange resin speciation of aqueous arsenic. Water Res 38:1155–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Johannesson KH, Tang J (2009) Conservative behavior of arsenic and other oxyanion-forming trace elements in an oxic groundwater flow system. J Hydrol 378:13–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Johannesson KH, Tang J, Daniels JM, Bounds WJ, Burdige DJ (2004) Rare earth element concentrations and speciation in organic-rich blackwaters of the Great Dismal Swamp, Virginia, USA. Chem Geol 209:271–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Johnston RG, Krause RE, Meyer FW, Ryder PW, Tibbals CH, Hunn JD (1980) Estimated potentiometric surface for the Tertiary limestone aquifer system, southeastern United States, prior to development. U. S., Geol. Surv. Open-File Rept., pp 80–406Google Scholar
  85. Kirk MF, Holm TR, Park J, Jin Q, Sanford RA, Fouke BW, Bethke CM (2004) Bacterial sulfate reduction limits natural arsenic contamination in groundwater. Geology 32:953–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Lamoreaux PE (1989) Water development for phosphate mining in a karst setting—a complex environmental problem. Environ Geol Water Sci 14:117–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Landrum JT, Bennett PC, Engel AS, Alsina MA, Pastén PA, Milliken K (2009) Partitioning geochemistry of arsenic and antimony, El Tatio Geyser Field, Chile. Appl Geochem 24:664–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Leuz A-K, Mönch H, Johnson CA (2006) Sorption of Sb(III) and Sb(V) to goethite: influence on Sb(III) oxidation and mobilization. Environ Sci Technol 40:7277–7282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Lindberg RD, Runnells DD (1984) Ground water redox reactions: an analysis of equilibrium state applied to Eh measurements and geochemical modeling. Science 225:925–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Lowers HA, Breit GN, Foster AL, Whitney J, Yount J, Uddin MN, Muneem AA (2007) Arsenic incorporation into authigenic pyrite, Bengal Basin sediments, Bangladesh. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71:2699–2717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Mailloux BJ, Alexandrova E, Keimowitz AR, Wovkulich K, Freyer GA, Herron M, Stolz JF, Kenna TC, Pichler T, Polizzotto ML, Dong H, Bishop M, Knappett PSK (2009) Microbial mineral weathering for nutrient acquisition releases arsenic. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:2558–2565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Manning BA, Goldberg S (1996) Modeling arsenate competitive adsorption onto kaolinite, montmorillonite and illite. Clays Clay Mineral 44:609–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Manning BA, Goldberg S (1997) Adsorption and stability of As(III) at the clay mineral—water interface. Environ Sci Technol 31:2005–2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Martínez-Lladó X, de Pablo J, Giménez J, Ayora C, Martí V, Rovira M (2008) Sorption of antimony(V) onto synthetic goethite in carbonate medium. Solv Extract Ion Exchange 26:289–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. McArthur JM, Ravenscroft P, Safiulla S, Thirlwall MF (2001) Arsenic in groundwater: testing pollution mechanisms for sedimentary aquifers in Bangladesh. Water Resour Res 37:109–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. McArthur JM, Banerjee DM, Hudson-Edwards KA, Mishra R, Purohit R, Ravenscroft P, Cronin A, Howarth RJ, Chatterjee A, Talukder T, Lowry D, Houghton S, Chadha DK (2004) Natural organic matter in sedimentary basins and its relation to arsenic in anoxic ground water: the example of West Bengal and its worldwide implications. Appl Geochem 19:1255–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. McArthur JM, Ravenscroft P, Banerjee DM, Milsom J, Hudson-Edwards KA, Sengupta S, Bristow C, Sarkar A, Tonkin S, Purohit R (2008) How paleosols influence groundwater flow and arsenic pollution: a model from the Bengal Basin and its worldwide implications. Water Resour Res 44:W11411. doi:10.1029/2007/WR006552 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. McArthur JM, Banerjee DM, Sengupta S, Ravencroft P, Klump S, Sarkar A, Disch B, Kipfer R (2010) Mirgration of As and 3H/3He ages, in groundwater from West Bengal: implications for monitoring. Water Res 44:4171–4185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. McCarley AB (1981) Metamorphic terrane favored over Rocky Mountains as source of Claiborne Group, Eocene, Texas Coastal Plain. J Sed Petrol 51:1267–1276Google Scholar
  100. McCleskey RB, Nordstrom DK, Maest AS (2004) Preservation of water samples for arsenic (III/V) determinations: an evaluation of the literature and new analytical results. Appl Geochem 19:995–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. McCreadie H, Blowes DW, Ptacek CJ, Jambor JL (2000) Influence of reduction reactions and solid-phase composition on porewater concentrations of arsenic. Environ Sci Technol 34:3159–3166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Meliker JR, Nriagu JO (2007) Arsenic in drinking water and bladder cancer: review of epidemiological evidence. In: Bhattacharya P, Mukherjee AB, Bundschuh J, Zevenhoven R, Loeppert RH (eds) Arsenic in soil and groundwater environment: biogeochemical interactions, health effects and remediation. Trace metals and other contaminants in the environment, vol 9. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 551–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Middelburg JJ, Hoede D, van der Sloot HA, van der Weijden CH, Wijstra J (1988) Arsenic, antimony and vanadium in the North Atlantic Ocean. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 52:2871–2878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Miller JA (1986) Hydrogeological framework of the Floridan Aquifer system in Florida and in parts of Georgia, Alabama, and South Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey Prof. Paper 1403-BGoogle Scholar
  105. Mitsunobu S, Harada T, Takahashi Y (2006) Comparison of antimony behavior with that of arsenic under various soil redox conditions. Environ Sci Technol 40:7270–7276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Moore JN, Ficklin WH, Johns C (1988) Partitioning of arsenic and metals in reducing sulfidic sediments. Environ Sci Technol 22:432–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Navas-Acien A, Silbergeld EK, Pastor-Barriuso R, Guallar E (2008) Arsenic exposure and prevalence of type 2 diabetes in US adults. JAMA 300:814–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Neumann RB, Ashfaque KN, Badruzzaman ABM, Ali MA, Shoemaker JK, Harvey CF (2010) Anthropogenic influences on groundwater arsenic concentrations in Bangladesh. Nat Geosci 3:46–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Nickson R, McArthur J, Burgess W, Ahmed KM, Ravenscroft P, Rahman M (1998) Arsenic poisoning of Bangladesh groundwater. Nature 395:338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Nickson RT, McArthur JM, Ravenscroft P, Burgess WG, Ahmed KM (2000) Mechanism of arsenic release to groundwater, Bangladesh and West Bengal. Appl Geochem 15:403–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Niedzielski P, Siepak J, Siepak M (2001) Total content of arsenic, antimony and selenium in groundwater samples from western Poland. Polish J EnvironStud 10:347–350Google Scholar
  112. NRC (1999) Arsenic in drinking water. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  113. NRC (2001) Arsenic in drinking water (2001 Update). National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  114. Nriagu JO (2002) Arsenic poisoning through the ages. In: Frankenberger WT (ed) Environmental chemistry of arsenic. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 1–26Google Scholar
  115. O’Day PA, Vlassopoulos D, Root R, Rivera N (2004) The influence of sulfur and iron on dissolved arsenic concentrations in the shallow subsurface under changing redox conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101:13703–13708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Oremland RS, Stolz JF (2005) Arsenic, microbes and contaminated aquifers. Trend Microbiol 13:45–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Page RA (1957) The questionable age of the Aquia formation. J Paleontol 33:347–350Google Scholar
  118. Pauling L (1988) General chemistry. Dover Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  119. Pearcy CA, Chevis DA, Haug JT, Jeffires HA, Yang N, Tang J, Grimm DA, Johannesson KH (2011) Evidence of microbially mediated arsenic mobilization from sediments of the Aquia aquifer, Maryland, USA. Appl Geochem 26:575–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Pearson FJ Jr, White DE (1967) Carbon 14 ages and flow rates of water in Carrizo sand, Atascosa County, Texas. Water Resour Res 3:251–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Pierce ML, Moore CB (1982) Adsorption of arsenite and arsenate on amorphous iron hydroxides. Water Res 16:1247–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Pitman AL, Pourbaix M, de Zoubov N (1957) Potential-pH diagram of the antimony water system: its applications to properties of the metal, its compounds, its corrosion, and antimony electrodes. J Electrochem Soc 104:594–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Plummer LN, Sprinkle CL (2001) Radiocarbon dating of dissolved inorganic carbon in groundwater from confined parts of the Upper Floridan aquifer, Floridan, USA. Hydrogeol J 9:127–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Plummer LN, Parkhurst DL, Thorstenson DC (1983) Development of reaction models for ground-water systems. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 47:665–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Polizzotto ML, Harvey CF, Sutton SR, Fendorf S (2005) Processes conducive to release and transport of arsenic into aquifers of Bangladesh. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:18819–18823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Purdy CB, Mignerey AC, Helz GR, Drummond DD, Kubik PW, Elmore D, Hemmick T (1987) 36Cl: a tracer in groundwater in the Aquia formation of Southern Maryland. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B 29:372–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Purdy CB, Burr GS, Rubin M, Helz GR, Mignerey AC (1992) Dissolved organic and inorganic 14C concentrations and ages for Coastal Plain aquifers in Southern Maryland. Radiocarbon 34:654–663Google Scholar
  128. Purdy CB, Helz GR, Mignerey AC (1996) Aquia aquifer dissolved Cl and 36Cl/Cl: implications for flow velocities. Water Resour Res 32:1163–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Ratnaike RN (2003) Acute and chronic arsenic toxicity. Postgrad Med J 79:391–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Ravenscroft P, Brammer H, Richards K (2009) Arsenic pollution: a global synthesis. Wiley-Blackwell, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Rittle KA, Drever JI, Colberg PJS (1995) Precipitation of arsenic during bacterial sulfate reduction. Geomicrobiol J 13:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Runnells DD, Lindberg RD (1990) Selenium in aqueous solutions: the impossibility of obtaining a meaningful Eh measurement using a platinum electrode, with implications for modeling of natural waters. Geology 18:212–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Rye RO, Back W, Hanshaw BB, Rightmire CT, Pearson FJ (1981) The origin and isotopic composition of dissolved sulfide in groundwater from carbonate aquifers in Florida and Texas. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 45:1941–1950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Sacks LA, Herman JS, Kauffman SJ (1995) Controls on high sulfate concentrations in the Upper Floridan aquifer in southwest Florida. Water Resour Res 31:2541–2551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Smedley PL, Kinniburgh DG (2002) A review of the source, behavior and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Appl Geochem 17:517–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Smith AH, Lopipero PA, Bates MN, Steinmaus CM (2002) Arsenic epidemiology and drinking water standards. Science 296:2145–2146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Somasundaran P, Aqar GE (1967) The zero point of charge of calcite. J Colloids Interface Sci 24:433–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Sprinkle CL (1989) Geochemistry of the Floridan aquifer system in Florida and in parts of Georgia, South Carolina, and Alabama. U. S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 1403-1, 105 pGoogle Scholar
  139. Sracek O, Bhattacharya P, Jacks G, Gustafsson J, Bromssen M (2004) Behavior of arsenic and geochemical modeling of arsenic enrichment in aqueous environments. Appl Geochem 19:169–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Stauffer RE, Thompson JM (1984) Arsenic and antimony in geothermal waters of Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 48:2547–2561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Stefánsson A, Arnórsson S, Sveinbjörnsdóttir Á (2005) Redox reactions and potentials in natural waters at disequilibrium. Chem Geol 221:289–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Stookey L (1970) Ferrozine—a new spectrophotometric reagent for iron. Anal Chem 42:779–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Stringfield VT (1936) Artesian water in the Florida peninsula. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 773-C, pp 115–195Google Scholar
  144. Stringfield VT (1966) Artesian water in Tertiary limestone in the southeasterns States. U.S. Geological Survey Prof Paper, 517Google Scholar
  145. Stute M, Schlosser P, Clark JF, Broecker WS (1992) Paleotemperatures in the southwestern United States derived from noble gases in ground water. Science 256:1000–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Tang J, Johannesson KH (2005) Rare earth element concentrations, speciation, and fractionation along groundwater flow paths: the Carrizo Sand (Texas) and Upper Floridan aquifers. In: Johannesson KH (ed) Rare earth elements in groundwater flow systems. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 223–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Tang J, Johannesson KH (2006) Controls on the geochemistry of rare earth elements along a groundwater flow path in the Carrizo Sand aquifer, Texas, USA. Chem Geol 225:156–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Taylor SR, McLennan SR (1985) The continental crust: its composition and evolution. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  149. Tighe ME, Ashley P, Lockwood P, Wilson S (2005) Soil, water, and pasture enrichment of antimony and arsenic within a coastal floodplain system. Sci Total Environ 347:175–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Todd TW, Folk RL (1957) Basal Claiborne of Texas, record of Appalachian tectonism during Eocene. Am Assoc Petroleum Geologists Bull 41:2545–2566Google Scholar
  151. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1979) Water related fate of the 129 Priority Pollutants, vol 1. USEPA, Washington, DC, USA, Doc. 745-R-00-007Google Scholar
  152. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2001) National primary drinking water regulations; arsenic and clarifications to compliance and new source contaminants monitoring. Federal Register: 22 Jan 2001, vol 66, no 14, p 6975 (http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-WATER/2001/January/Day-22/w1668.htm), accessed 17 Feb 2011
  153. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2009) National primary drinking water regulations. EPA 816-F-09-004, http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/upload/mcl-2.pdf, Accessed 17 Feb 2011
  154. van Geen A, Rose J, Thoral S, Garnier JM, Zheng Y, Bottero JY (2004) Decoupling of As and Fe release to Bangladesh groundwater under reducing conditions. Part II: evidence from sediment incubations. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 68:3475–3486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Wagman DD, Evans WH, Parker VB, Schumm RH, Halow I, Bailey SM, Churney KL, Nuttall RL (1982) The NBS tables of chemical thermodynamic properties: Selected values for inorganic and C1 and C2 organic substances in SI units. J Phys Chem Ref Data 11(2):1–392Google Scholar
  156. Wedepohl KH (1995) The composition of the continental crust. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 59:1217–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Wenzel WW, Kirchbaumer N, Prohaska T, Stingeder G, Lombi E, Adriano DC (2001) Arsenic fractionation in soils using an improved sequential extraction procedure. Anal Chim Acta 436:309–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Whitfield M (1974) Thermodynamic limitations on the use of the platinum electrode in Eh measurments. Limnol Oceanogr 19:857–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Wicks CM, Herman JS (1994) The effect of confining unit on the geochemical evolution of ground water in the Upper Floridan aquifer system. J Hydrol 153:139–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Wicks CM, Herman JS (1996) Regional hydrogeochemistry of a modern coastal mixing zone. Water Resour Res 32:401–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Wilkie JA, Hering JG (1998) Rapid oxidation of geothermal As(III) in streamwaters of the eastern Sierra Nevada. Environ Sci Technol 32:657–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Wilkin RT, Wallschläger D, Ford RG (2003) Speciation of arsenic in sulfidic waters. Geochem Trans 4:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Willis SS, Johannesson KH (2011) Controls on the geochemistry of rare earth elements in sediments and groundwaters of the Aquia aquifer, Maryland, USA. Chem Geol. doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.02.020
  164. Wilson SC, Lockwood PV, Ashley PM, Tighe M (2010) The chemistry and behavior of antimony in the soil environment with comparisons to arsenic: a critical review. Environ Poll 158:1169–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Wilson WE, Gerhart JM (1979) Simulated changes in potentiometric levels resulting from groundwarer development for phosphate mines, West-Central Florida. Dev Water Sci 12:491–515Google Scholar
  166. Wolff RG (1967) X-ray and chemical study of weathering glauconite. Am Mineral 52:1129–1138Google Scholar
  167. World Health Organization (1996) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, vol 2, 2nd edn. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  168. World Health Organization (2003) Antimony in drinking-water. Background document for preparation of WHO Guidelines for drinking-water quality. World Health Organization, Geneva, WHO/SDE/WSH/03.04/74Google Scholar
  169. Yoshida T, Yamauchi H, Sun GF (2004) Chronic health effects in people exposed to arsenic via drinking water: dose-response relationships in review. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 198:243–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Zheng Y, Stute M, van Geen A, Gavrieli I, Dhar R, Simpson H, Schlosser P, Ahmed K (2004) Redox control of arsenic mobilization in Bangladesh groundwater. Appl Geochem 19:201–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Zheng Y, van Geen A, Stute M, Dhar R, Mo Z, Cheng Z, Horneman A, Gavrieli I, Simpson HJ, Versteeg R, Steckler M, Gravzioli-Venier A, Goodbred S, Shahnewaz M, Shamsudduha M, Hoque MA, Ahmed KM (2005) Geochemical and hydrogeological contrasts between shallow and deeper aquifers in two villages of Araihazar, Bangladesh: implications for deeper aquifers as drinking water sources. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 69:5203–5218CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie S. Willis
    • 1
  • Shama E. Haque
    • 2
  • Karen H. Johannesson
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Earth and Environmental SciencesThe University of Texas at ArlingtonArlingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Earth and Ocean SciencesThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  3. 3.Department of Earth and Environmental SciencesTulane UniversityNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations