Abstract
We have previously reported that the level of MyoD expression correlates with the level of apoptosis that occurs in a subpopulation of skeletal myoblasts induced to differentiate by serum withdrawal. Herein we document that MyoD expression contributes to the level of apoptosis in myoblasts and fibroblasts in response to a variety of apoptotic stimuli. Specifically, re-expression of MyoD in skeletal myoblasts rendered defective for both differentiation and apoptosis by the expression of oncogenic Ras restores their ability to undergo both differentiation and apoptosis in response to serum withdrawal. Further, using a fibroblast cell line expressing an estrogen receptor:MyoD fusion protein, we have determined that addition of estrogen sensitizes these fibroblasts to apoptosis induced by serum withdrawal, or by treatment with etoposide or thapsigargin. RNAi mediated silencing of MyoD in either 23A2 or C2C12 myoblasts renders these cells resistant to apoptosis induced by serum withdrawal, or by treatment with etoposide or thapsigargin. Finally, MyoD mediated regulation of the apoptotic response to these various stimuli, in both myoblasts and fibroblasts, correlates with the level of induction of the pro-apoptotic Bcl2 family member PUMA.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.








References
Ellis RE, Yuan JY, Horvitz HR (1991) Mechanisms and functions of cell death. Annu Rev Cell Biol 7:663–698
Raff MC (1992) Social controls on cell survival and cell death. Nature 356:397–400
Zeuner A, Eramo A, Peschle C, De Maria R (1999) Caspase activation without death. Cell Death Differ 6:1075–1080
Schwerk C, Schulze-Osthoff K (2003) Non-apoptotic functions of caspases in cellular proliferation and differentiation. Biochem Pharmacol 66:1453–1458
Partridge TA (2002) Cells that participate in regeneration of skeletal muscle. Gene Ther 9:752–753
Skuk D, Caron NJ, Goulet M, Roy B, Tremblay JP (2003) Resetting the problem of cell death following muscle-derived cell transplantation: detection, dynamics and mechanisms. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 62:951–967
Menasche P (2004) Skeletal myoblast transplantation for cardiac repair. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2:21–28
Dee K, Freer M, Mei Y, Weyman CM (2002) Apoptosis coincident with the differentiation of skeletal myoblasts is delayed by caspase 3 inhibition and abrogated by MEK-independent constitutive Ras signaling. Cell Death Differ 9:209–218
Wang J, Walsh K (1996) Resistance to apoptosis conferred by Cdk inhibitors during myocyte differentiation. Science 273:359–361
Shaltouki A, Freer M, Mei Y, Weyman CM (2007) Increased expression of the pro-apoptotic Bcl(2) family member PUMA is required for mitochondrial release of cytochrome C and the apoptosis associated with skeletal myoblast differentiation. Apoptosis 12:2143–2154
Hollenberg SM, Cheng PF, Weintraub H (1993) Use of a conditional MyoD transcription factor in studies of MyoD trans-activation and muscle determination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:8028–8032
Karasarides M, Dee K, Schulman D, Wolfman A, Weyman CM (2006) Active Ras-induced effects on skeletal myoblast differentiation and apoptosis are independent of constitutive PI3-kinase activity. Cell Biol Int 30:308–318
DeChant AK, Dee K, Weyman CM (2002) Raf-induced effects on the differentiation and apoptosis of skeletal myoblasts are determined by the level of Raf signaling: abrogation of apoptosis by Raf is downstream of caspase 3 activation. Oncogene 21:5268–5279
Konieczny SF, Drobes BL, Menke SL, Taparowsky EJ (1989) Inhibition of myogenic differentiation by the H-ras oncogene is associated with the down regulation of the MyoD1 gene. Oncogene 4:473–481
Olson EN (1992) Interplay between proliferation and differentiation within the myogenic lineage. Dev Biol 154:261–272
Michalak EM, Villunger A, Adams JM, Strasser A (2008) In several cell types tumour suppressor p53 induces apoptosis largely via Puma but Noxa can contribute. Cell Death Differ 15:1019–1029
Li J, Lee B, Lee AS (2006) Endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis: multiple pathways and activation of p53-up-regulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA) and NOXA by p53. J Biol Chem 281:7260–7270
Tapscott SJ (2005) The circuitry of a master switch: Myod and the regulation of skeletal muscle gene transcription. Development 132:2685–2695
Bergstrom DA, Penn BH, Strand A, Perry RL, Rudnicki MA, Tapscott SJ (2002) Promoter-specific regulation of MyoD binding and signal transduction cooperate to pattern gene expression. Mol Cell 9:587–600
Asakura A, Hirai H, Kablar B et al (2007) Increased survival of muscle stem cells lacking the MyoD gene after transplantation into regenerating skeletal muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:16552–16557
Conradt B, Xue D (2005) Programmed cell death. WormBook 1–13
Thellmann M, Hatzold J, Conradt B (2003) The snail-like CES-1 protein of C. elegans can block the expression of the BH3-only cell-death activator gene egl-1 by antagonizing the function of bHLH proteins. Development 130:4057–4071
Dang CV (1999) c-Myc target genes involved in cell growth, apoptosis, and metabolism. Mol Cell Biol 19:1–11
Pelengaris S, Khan M, Evan G (2002) c-MYC: more than just a matter of life and death. Nat Rev Cancer 2:764–776
La Rocca SA, Crouch DH, Gillespie DA (1994) c-Myc inhibits myogenic differentiation and myoD expression by a mechanism which can be dissociated from cell transformation. Oncogene 9:3499–3508
Vousden KH, Prives C (2009) Blinded by the light: the growing complexity of p53. Cell 137:413–431
Lin T, Chao C, Saito S et al (2005) p53 Induces differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells by suppressing Nanog expression. Nat Cell Biol 7:165–171
Molchadsky A, Shats I, Goldfinger N et al (2008) p53 Plays a role in mesenchymal differentiation programs, in a cell fate dependent manner. PLoS One 3:e3707
Porrello A, Cerone MA, Coen S et al (2000) p53 Regulates myogenesis by triggering the differentiation activity of pRb. J Cell Biol 151:1295–1304
Cerone MA, Marchetti A, Bossi G, Blandino G, Sacchi A, Soddu S (2000) p53 Is involved in the differentiation but not in the differentiation-associated apoptosis of myoblasts. Cell Death Differ 7:506–508
Gottifredi V, Peschiaroli A, Fimia GM, Maione R (1999) p53-Independent apoptosis induced by muscle differentiation stimuli in polyomavirus large T-expressing myoblasts. J Cell Sci 112(Pt 14):2397–2407
Peschiaroli A, Figliola R, Coltella L et al (2002) MyoD induces apoptosis in the absence of RB function through a p21(WAF1)-dependent re-localization of cyclin/cdk complexes to the nucleus. Oncogene 21:8114–8127
Toth A, Jeffers JR, Nickson P et al (2006) Targeted deletion of Puma attenuates cardiomyocyte death and improves cardiac function during ischemia-reperfusion. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 291:H52–H60
Nickson P, Toth A, Erhardt P (2007) PUMA is critical for neonatal cardiomyocyte apoptosis induced by endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cardiovasc Res 73:48–56
Sabourin LA, Girgis-Gabardo A, Seale P, Asakura A, Rudnicki MA (1999) Reduced differentiation potential of primary MyoD−/− myogenic cells derived from adult skeletal muscle. J Cell Biol 144:631–643
Megeney LA, Kablar B, Garrett K, Anderson JE, Rudnicki MA (1996) MyoD is required for myogenic stem cell function in adult skeletal muscle. Genes Dev 10:1173–1183
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH grant AR053857 awarded to C. M. Weyman. T. Harford and A. Shaltouki were each supported by a Molecular Medicine Fellowship. ER-MyoD:10T1/2 fibroblasts were kindly provided by Dr. Tapscott, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA. We thank Dr. Margot Freer-Prokop (Department of Biology, Cuyahoga Community College) for careful reading of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harford, T.J., Shaltouki, A. & Weyman, C.M. Increased expression of the pro-apoptotic Bcl2 family member PUMA and apoptosis by the muscle regulatory transcription factor MyoD in response to a variety of stimuli. Apoptosis 15, 71–82 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10495-009-0428-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10495-009-0428-5