Abstract
In this paper, an experimental study, aimed at delaying flow separation on a high-lift device using a pulsed blowing excitation method, is reported. The main objective of this investigation was to evaluate a new pulsed jet generation strategy to enhance flow control performance. In these experiments, two types of signal waveform were implemented to produce the unsteady blowing; a simple square-wave excitation signal for the first case, and a burst modulated excitation signal for the second case. The signal modulation was the first time to be used for a fast-switching solenoid valve actuator. Another objective of this study was to evaluate a new arrangement of the jet exit slots, in the form of a vortex generator which was employed for the first time on the high-lift device. For this purpose, a NASA SC(2)-0714 airfoil with a single slotted flap was employed. The vortex generator jets emanated from the shoulder of the trailing-edge flap with excitation frequencies from 40 to 1000 Hz. Pressure distribution around the model and wake total pressure deficit were measured. The results indicated that ejection from vortex generator slot pairs was able to prevent flow separation completely in most conditions. These measurements revealed that the burst modulated excitation signal was accompanied by more aerodynamic improvements and less air consumption relative to the simple pulsed jet excitation signal. In the best flow control mode, the results showed about a 53% increase in the value of the suction pressure peak on the flap and a 38% decrease in drag with a reduction in total pressure loss.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- A :
-
Exit area of the slot pair (m2)
- C ref. :
-
Clean cruise chord length (m)
- C flap :
-
Flap chord length (m)
- C p :
-
Pressure coefficient
- C μ :
-
Excitation momentum coefficient
- DC:
-
Duty cycle
- f :
-
Excitation frequency (Hz)
- f m :
-
Modulating frequency (Hz)
- f c :
-
Carrier frequency (Hz)
- F + :
-
Nondimensional frequency, F+ = f Lf/V
- F m + :
-
Nondimensional modulating frequency, F+ = fm Lf/V
- F c + :
-
Nondimensional carrier frequency, F+ = fc Lf/V
- k :
-
Number of active actuators or number of slot pairs
- L :
-
Length scale of the flow domain (m)
- L f :
-
Length of flap chord (m)
- l :
-
Length of actuator slot (m)
- MPJ:
-
Modulated pulse jet
- N:
-
Number of hot-wire samples in each position
- \(q\) :
-
Dynamic pressure (\(q=\frac{1}{2}\rho {V}^{2}\))
- \(\dot{q}\) :
-
Volume flow rate (m3/s)
- S :
-
Planform area of flap (m2)
- SPJ:
-
Simple pulsed jet
- U i :
-
Instantaneous velocity (m/s)
- U c :
-
Mean centerline velocity of the jet (m/s)
- U exit :
-
Mean centerline velocity at the jet exit (m/s)
- u rms :
-
RMS of jet centerline velocity fluctuations (m/s)
- V :
-
Freestream velocity (m/s)
- w :
-
Length of the wake rake (m)
- x/D :
-
Nondimensional downstream centerline distance from jet exit
- x/c flap :
-
Nondimensional length of flap chord
- x/c ref. :
-
Nondimensional length of the model chord
- α :
-
Angle of attack (°)
- ∆P Total :
-
Total pressure loss (pa)
References
Abdolahipour, S., Mani, M., Taleghani, A.S.: Parametric study of a frequency-modulated pulse jet by measurements of flow characteristics. Phys. Scr. 96(12), 12–5012 (2021)
Abdolahipour, S., Mani, M., Taleghani, A.S.: Enhancing the high-lift properties of a supercritical wing by means of a modulated pulse jet actuator. Tech. Phys. Lett. (2022). https://doi.org/10.21883/PJTF.2022.01.51869.18999
Aley, K., Guha, T.K., Kumar, R.: Experimental characterization of a high-lift supercritical airfoil with microjets. In: 2018 flow control conference (p. 3688) (2018).
Aley, K., Guha, T.K., Kumar, R.: Active flow control of a high-lift supercritical airfoil with microjet actuators. AIAA J. 58(5), 2053–2069 (2020)
Amitay, M., Glezer, A.: Role of actuation frequency in controlled flow reattachment over a stalled airfoil. AIAA J. 40(2), 209–216 (2002a)
Amitay, M., Glezer, A.: Controlled transients of flow reattachment over stalled airfoils. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 23(5), 690–699 (2002b)
Amitay, M., Smith, D.R., Kibens, V., Parekh, D.E., Glezer, A.: Aerodynamic flow control over an unconventional airfoil using synthetic jet actuators. AIAA J. 39(3), 361–370 (2001)
Bauer, M., Lohse, J., Haucke, F., Nitsche, W.: High-lift performance investigation of a two-element configuration with a two-stage actuator system. AIAA J. 52(6), 1307–1313 (2014)
Benard, N., Moreau, E.: Capabilities of the dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator for multi-frequency excitations. J. Phys. D 43(14), 145–201 (2010)
Benard, N., Moreau, E.: Response of a circular cylinder wake to a symmetric actuation by non-thermal plasma discharges. Exp. Fluids 54(2), 1467 (2013)
Benard, N., Pons-Prats, J., Periaux, J., Bugeda, G., Braud, P., Bonnet, J.P., Moreau, E.: Turbulent separated shear flow control by surface plasma actuator: experimental optimization by genetic algorithm approach. Exp. Fluids 57(2), 22 (2016)
Bernardini, C., Benton, S.I., Chen, J.P., Bons, J.P.: Pulsed jets laminar separation control using instability exploitation. AIAA J. 52(1), 104–115 (2014)
Cai, Z., Chen, P., Angland, D., Zhang, X.: Active flow separation control by a positional based iterative learning control with experimental validation. Int. J. Control 87(3), 633–641 (2013a)
Cai, Z., Chen, P., Angland, D., Zhang, X.: A position based iterative learning control applied to active flow control. In: American control conference, IEEE, NJ, 5184–5189 (2013b)
Cai, Z., Angland, D., Zhang, X., Chen, P.: Iterative learning control for trailing-edge flap lift enhancement with pulsed blowing. AIAA J. 53(7), 1969–1979 (2015)
Çetin, C., Çelik, A., Yavuz, M.M.: Control of flow structure over a nonslender delta wing using periodic blowing. AIAA J. 56(1), 90–99 (2018)
Choutapalli, I., Krothapalli, A., Arakeri, J.H.: An experimental study of an axisymmetric turbulent pulsed air jet. J. Fluid Mech. 631, 23 (2009)
Ciobaca, V., Wild, J.: An overview of recent DLR contributions on active flow-separation control studies for high-lift configurations. AerospaceLab 6, 1 (2013)
Ciobaca, V., Kühn, T., Rudnik, R., Bauer, M., Gölling, B., Breitenstein, W.: Active flow-separation control on a high-lift wing-body configuration. J. Aircr. 50(1), 56–72 (2013)
Corke, T.C.: Design of Aircraft. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2003)
Darabi, A. and Wygnanski, I., 2004. Active management of naturally separated flow over a solid surface. Part 1. The forced reattachment process. J. Fluid Mech. 510, 105
Dhakal, S., Yang, Y., Zha, G., Boling, J.: Numerical investigation of low speed performance of transonic coflow jet airfoil. In: 35th AIAA applied aerodynamics conference (p. 3249) (2017)
Eroglu, A., Breidenthal, R.E.: Structure, penetration, and mixing of pulsed jets in crossflow. AIAA J. 39(3), 417–423 (2001)
Feero, M.A.: Investigation of synthetic jet flow control parameters for the mitigation of laminar boundary layer separation, Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto (2018)
Feero, M.A., Goodfellow, S.D., Lavoie, P., Sullivan, P.E.: Flow reattachment using synthetic jet actuation on a low-Reynolds-number airfoil. AIAA J. 53(7), 2005–2014 (2015)
Feero, M.A., Lavoie, P., Sullivan, P.E.: Influence of synthetic jet location on active control of an airfoil at low Reynolds number. Exp. Fluids 58(8), 99 (2017)
Fiedler, H.E., Fernholz, H.H.: On management and control of turbulent shear flows. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 27(4), 305–387 (1990)
Glezer, A.: Some aspects of aerodynamic flow control using synthetic-jet actuation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 369(1940), 1476–1494 (2011)
Glezer, A., Amitay, M., Honohan, A.M.: Aspects of low-and high-frequency actuation for aerodynamic flow control. AIAA J. 43(7), 1501–1511 (2005)
Godard, G., Stanislas, M.: Control of a decelerating boundary layer. Part 1: optimization of passive vortex generators. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 10(3), 181–191 (2006)
Godard, G., Stanislas, M.: Control of a decelerating boundary layer. Part 3: optimization of round jets vortex generators. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 10(6), 455–464 (2006)
Godard, G., Foucaut, J.M., Stanislas, M.: Control of a decelerating boundary layer. Part 2: optimization of slotted jets vortex generators. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 10(5), 394–400 (2006)
Greenblatt, D., Wygnanski, I.J.: The control of flow separation by periodic excitation. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 36(7), 487–545 (2000)
Haucke, F., Bauer, M., Nitsche, W.: Combined active separation control on the leading-edge and on the trailing-edge flap of a slatless high-lift configuration. In: New results in numerical and experimental fluid mechanics X (pp. 215–225). Springer, Cham (2016)
Johari, H.: Scaling of fully pulsed jets in crossflow. AIAA J. 44(11), 2719–2725 (2006)
Johari, H., Pacheco-Tougas, M., Hermanson, J.C.: Penetration and mixing of fully modulated turbulent jets in crossflow. AIAA J. 37(7), 842–850 (1999)
Kölzsch, A.: Active flow control of delta wing leading-edge vortices (Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universität München) (2017)
Konstantinidis, E.: Active control of bluff-body flows using plasma actuators. In: Actuators (vol. 8, p. 66). Multidisciplinary digital publishing institute (2019)
Kostas, J., Foucaut, J.M., Stanislas, M.: The effects of pulse frequency and duty cycle on the skin friction downstream of pulsed jet vortex generators in an adverse pressure gradient turbulent boundary layer. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 13(1), 36–48 (2009)
Marxen, O., Kotapati, R.B., Mittal, R., Zaki, T.: Stability analysis of separated flows subject to control by zero-net-mass-flux jet. Phys. Fluids 27(2), 024107 (2015)
McManus, K., Joshi, P., Legner, H. and Davis, S., 1995, June. Active control of aerodynamic stall using pulsed jet actuators. In Fluid Dynamics Conference (p. 2187).
Mirzaei, M., Taleghani, A.S., Shadaram, A.: Experimental study of vortex shedding control using plasma actuator. Appl. Mech. Mater. 186, 75–86 (2012)
Ortmanns, J., Kähler, C.J., Weg, B.: Investigation of pulsed actuators for active flow control using phase locked stereoscopic particle image velocimetry. In: International symposium on applications of laser techniques in fluid mechanics (vol 12) (2004)
Pauley, W.R., Eaton, J.K.: Experimental study of the development of longitudinal vortex pairs embedded in a turbulent boundary layer. AIAA J. 26(7), 816–823 (1988)
Petz, R., Nitsche, W.: Active separation control on the flap of a two-dimensional generic high-lift configuration. J. Aircr. 44(3), 865–874 (2007)
Radespiel, R., Burnazzi, M., Casper, M., Scholz, P.: Active flow control for high lift with steady blowing. Aeronaut. J. 120(1223), 171–200 (2016)
Rice, T.T., Taylor, K., Amitay, M.: Quantification of the S817 airfoil aerodynamic properties and their control using synthetic jet actuators. Wind Energy 21(10), 823–836 (2018)
Salmasi, A., Shadaram, A., Taleghani, A.S.: Effect of plasma actuator placement on the airfoil efficiency at poststall angles of attack. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 41(10), 3079–3085 (2013)
Sato, M., Okada, K., Asada, K., Aono, H., Nonomura, T., Fujii, K.: Unified mechanisms for separation control around airfoil using plasma actuator with burst actuation over Reynolds number range of 103–106. Phys. Fluids 32(2), 025102 (2020)
Schlichting, H.: Boundary Layer Theory, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1987)
Scholz, P., Ortmanns, J., Kähler, C.J., Radespiel, R.: Performance optimization of jet actuator arrays for active flow control. In: CEAS/KATnet conference on key aerodynamic technologies, Bremen (pp. 20–22) (2005)
Scholz, P., Ortmanns, J., Kähler, C.J., Radespiel, R.: Influencing the mixing process in a turbulent boundary layer by pulsed jet actuators. In: New results in numerical and experimental fluid mechanics V (vol. 92, pp. 265–272). Springer, Berlin (2006)
Scholz, P., Casper, M., Ortmanns, J., Kähler, C.J., Radespiel, R.: Leading-edge separation control by means of pulsed vortex generator jets. AIAA J. 46(4), 837–846 (2008)
Seifert, A., Darabi, A., Wyganski, I.: Delay of airfoil stall by periodic excitation. J. Aircr. 33(4), 691–698 (1996)
Seifert, A., Greenblatt, D., Wygnanski, I.J.: Active separation control: an overview of Reynolds and Mach numbers effects. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 8(7), 569–582 (2004)
Steinfurth, B., Haucke, F.: Coherent structures in the actively controlled wake of a high-lift configuration. AIAA J. 56(10), 3848–3856 (2018)
Taleghani, A.S., Shadaram, A., Mirzaei, M.: Effects of duty cycles of the plasma actuators on improvement of pressure distribution above a NLF0414 airfoil. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 40(5), 1434–1440 (2012)
Taleghani, A.S., Shadaram, A., Mirzaei, M., Abdolahipour, S.: Parametric study of a plasma actuator at unsteady actuation by measurements of the induced flow velocity for flow control. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 40(4), 173 (2018)
Tilmann, C.P., Langan, K.J., Betterton, J.G., Wilson, M.J.: Characterization of pulsed vortex generator jets for active flow control. Air Force Research Laboratory AFRL-VA-WP-TP-2003- 336, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (2003)
Wang, L., Wong, C. W., Fu, X., Zhou, Y.: Influence of burst-modulated frequency on sawtooth DBD plasma actuator for flow separation control. In: 2018 AIAA aerospace sciences meeting (p. 1062) (2018)
Wu, W., Seo, J.H., Meneveau, C., Mittal, R. (2018). Response of a laminar separation bubble to forcing with zero-net mass flux jets. In: Proc. 2018 flow control conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum (AIAA 2018-4018)
Yarusevych, S., Kawall, J.G., Sullivan, P.E.: Airfoil performance at low Reynolds numbers in the presence of periodic disturbances (2006)
Zhang, X., Collins, M.W.: Measurements of a longitudinal vortex generated by a rectangular jet in a turbulent boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 9(6), 1665–1673 (1997)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abdolahipour, S., Mani, M. & Shams Taleghani, A. Pressure Improvement on a Supercritical High-Lift Wing Using Simple and Modulated Pulse Jet Vortex Generator. Flow Turbulence Combust 109, 65–100 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-022-00327-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-022-00327-9