## Abstract

Spray evaporation in spatially decaying turbulence is simulated using carrier-phase direct numerical simulations (CP-DNS). The CP-DNS cover a much wider parameter range than earlier fully resolved DNS of regular droplet arrays that were used to calibrate scaling laws for sub-grid closures of the distribution of mixture fraction and its conditionally averaged scalar dissipation. The scaling laws include the effects of sub-grid interactions between droplet evaporation and turbulence, and here they are assessed by direct comparison with the statistics from the CP-DNS. Two issues can be observed: Firstly, care must be taken when interpreting the CP-DNS statistics as the lack of resolution of the point particle surface could impact on the values in DNS cells that are located within the (unresolved) quasi-laminar wake. Secondly, the scaling laws present similar agreement with CP-DNS data as had been observed before for the fully resolved DNS. The scaling law for the scalar dissipation approximates the DNS statistics well, independent of the droplet number density, Stokes number and turbulence intensity. The estimated mixture fraction distribution (the PDF) is good for the mixture fraction values larger than a suitable average value but deteriorates for smaller mixture fractions due to inherent model limitations. The data corroborate that the scaling laws for turbulent micro-mixing can potentially serve as sub-grid closures for mixture fraction based combustion models such as flamelet and conditional moment closure approaches in large eddy simulations and may provide better approximations than existing expressions derived from single-phase non-premixed combustion.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

## References

Menon, S., Patel, N.: Subgrid modeling for simulation of spray combustion in large-scale combustors. AIAA J.

**44**(4), 709–723 (2006)Lackmann, T., Kerstein, A.R., Oevermann, M.: A representative linear eddy model for simulating spray combustion in engines (RILEM). Combust. Flame

**193**, 1–15 (2018)Boileau, M., Pascaud, S., Riber, E., Cuenot, B., Gicquel, L.Y.M., Poinsot, T.J., Cazalens, M.: Investigation of two-fluid methods for large eddy simulation of spray combustion in gas turbines. Flow Turbul. Combust.

**80**(3), 291–321 (2008)Ma, L., Roekaerts, D.: Modeling of spray jet flame under MILD condition with non-adiabatic FGM and a new conditional droplet injection model. Combust. Flame

**165**, 402–423 (2016)Bojko, B.T., DesJardin, P.E.: On the development and application of a droplet flamelet-generated manifold for use in two-phase turbulent combustion simulations. Combust. Flame

**183**, 50–65 (2017)Ukai, S., Kronenburg, A., Stein, O.T.: Simulation of dilute acetone spray flames with LES-CMC using two conditional moments. Flow Turbul. Combust.

**93**(3), 405–423 (2014)Ukai, S., Kronenburg, A., Stein, O.T.: Large eddy simulation of dilute acetone spray flames using CMC coupled with tabulated chemistry. Proc. Combust. Inst.

**35**(2), 1667–1674 (2015)Giusti, A., Mastorakos, E.: Detailed chemistry LES/CMC simulation of a swirling ethanol spray flame approaching blow-off. Proc. Combust. Inst.

**36**(2), 2625–2632 (2017)Hasse, C., Peters, N.: A two mixture fraction flamelet model applied to split injections in a DI Diesel engine. Proc. Combust. Inst.

**30**(2), 2755–2762 (2005)Navarro-Martinez, S., Kronenburg, A., Di Mare, F.: Conditional moment closure for large eddy simulations. Flow Turbul. Combust.

**75**(1-4), 245–274 (2005)Bilger, R.W.: Turbulent flows with nonpremixed reactants. In: Turbulent reacting flows, pp 65–113. Springer, Berlin (1980)

O’Brien, E.E., Jiang, T.L.: The conditional dissipation rate of an initially binary scalar in homogeneous turbulence. Phys. Fluids A

**3**(12), 3121–3123 (1991)Réveillon, J., Vervisch, L.: Spray vaporization in nonpremixed turbulent combustion modeling: a single droplet model. Combustion and flame

**121**(1-2), 75–90 (2000)Schroll, P., Wandel, A.P., Cant, R.S., Mastorakos, E.: Direct numerical simulations of autoignition in turbulent two-phase flows. Proc. Combust. Inst.

**32**(2), 2275–2282 (2009)Wacks, D.H., Chakraborty, N., Mastorakos, E.: Statistical analysis of turbulent flame-droplet interaction: a direct numerical simulation study. Flow Turbul. Combust.

**96**(2), 573–607 (2016)Sreedhara, S., Huh, K.Y.: Conditional statistics of nonreacting and reacting sprays in turbulent flows by direct numerical simulation. Proc. Combust. Inst.

**31**(2), 2335–2342 (2007)Wang, H., Luo, K., Fan, J.: Direct numerical simulation and CMC (conditional moment closure) sub-model validation of spray combustion. Energy

**46**(1), 606–617 (2012)Seo, J., Huh, K.Y.: Analysis of combustion regimes and conditional statistics of autoigniting turbulent n-heptane sprays. Proc. Combust. Inst.

**33**(2), 2127–2134 (2011)Ukai, S., Kronenburg, A., Stein, O.T.: LES-CMC Of a dilute acetone spray flame. Proc. Combust. Inst.

**34**(1), 1643–1650 (2013)Bilger, R.W.: A mixture fraction framework for the theory and modeling of droplets and sprays. Combust. Flame

**158**(2), 191–202 (2011)Klimenko, A.Y., Bilger, R.W.: Conditional moment closure for turbulent combustion. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.

**25**(6), 595–687 (1999)Zoby, M.R.G., Navarro-Martinez, S., Kronenburg, A., Marquis, A.J.: Turbulent mixing in three-dimensional droplet arrays. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow

**32**(3), 499–509 (2011)Wang, B., Kronenburg, A., Dietzel, D., Stein, O.T.: Assessment of scaling laws for mixing fields in inter-droplet space. Proc. Combust. Inst.

**36**(2), 2451–2458 (2017)Wang, B., Kronenburg, A., Tufano, G.L., Stein, O.T.: Fully resolved DNS of droplet array combustion in turbulent convective flows and modelling for mixing fields in inter-droplet space. Combust. Flame

**189**, 347–366 (2018)Kolmogorov, A.N.: The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR

**30**(4), 299–303 (1941)Salazar, J.P., Collins, L.R.: Two-particle dispersion in isotropic turbulent flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.

**41**, 405–432 (2009)Tufano, G.L., Stein, O.T., Wang, B., Kronenburg, A., Rieth, M., Kempf, A.M.: Coal particle volatile combustion and flame interaction. Part II: effects of particle Reynolds number and turbulence. Fuel

**234**, 723–731 (2018)Kronenburg, A., Bilger, R.W.: Modelling of differential diffusion effects in nonpremixed nonreacting turbulent flow. Phys. Fluids

**9.5**, 1435–1447 (1997)Kronenburg, A., Bilger, R.W.: Modelling differential diffusion in nonpremixed reacting turbulent flow: model development. Combust. Sci. Technol.

**166**(1), 195–227 (2001)Xu, H., Hunger, F., Vascellari, M., Hasse, C.: A consistent flamelet formulation for a reacting char particle considering curvature effects. Combust. Flame

**160**(11), 2540–2558 (2013)Hunger, F., Dietzsch, F., Gauding, M., Hasse, C.: A priori analysis of differential diffusion for model development for scale-resolving simulations. Phys. Rev. Fluids

**3**(1), 014601 (2018)Batchelor, G.K.: Small-scale variation of convected quantities like temperature in turbulent fluid Part 1. General discussion and the case of small conductivity. J. Fluid Mech.

**5**(1), 113–133 (1959)Elghobashi, S.: On predicting particle-laden turbulent flows. Appl. Sci. Res.

**52**(4), 309–329 (1994)Miller, R.S., Bellan, J.: Direct numerical simulation of a confined three-dimensional gas mixing layer with one evaporating hydrocarbon-droplet-laden stream. J. Fluid Mech.

**384**, 293–338 (1999)White, F.M.: Viscous Fluid Flow. McGraw-Hill, New York (1974)

Turns, S.R.: An introduction to combustion. McGraw-Hill, New York (1996)

Faeth, G.M.: Current status of droplet and liquid combustion. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.

**3**(4), 191–224 (1977)Green, D.W., Perry, R.H.: Perry’s chemical engineers’ handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York (2008)

Billson, M., Eriksson, L.E., Davidson, L.: Jet noise prediction using stochastic turbulence modeling. In: 9th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference and exhibit, p 3282 (2003)

Sulabh, K.D., Jacob, E.T., Driscoll, J.F.: Unsteady aspects of lean premixed-prevaporized (LPP) gas turbine combustors: flame-flame interactions. AIAA g010-1148 (2010)

Williams, F.A.: Combustion theory, 2nd edn. Perseus Books, Reading, Massachussetts (1985)

Sirignano, W.A.: Fluid dynamics and transport of droplets and sprays. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)

Vo, S., Kronenburg, A., Stein, O.T., Hawkes, E.R.: Direct numerical simulation of non-premixed syngas combustion using OpenFOAM. In: High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering ’16, pp 245–257. Springer (2017)

Yeung, P.K., Pope, S.B.: Lagrangian statistics from direct numerical simulations of isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech.

**207**, 531–586 (1989)Shekar, S.: Direct numerical simulation of isotropic, decaying turbulence. ITV report, University of Stuttgart (2011)

## Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the financial support by the Chinese Scholarship Council (NO 201406020093) (B. Wang) and the computational resources by HLRS Stuttgart.

## Author information

### Authors and Affiliations

### Corresponding author

## Additional information

### Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Appendix: Derivation of the Mixture Fraction PDF in Inter-droplet Space

### Appendix: Derivation of the Mixture Fraction PDF in Inter-droplet Space

Here, spherical symmetry and constant thermodynamic properties are assumed for simplification. The continuity and mixture fraction transport equation for the droplet evaporation in the spherical coordinate system can be written as

We introduce the evaporation rate of the droplet, *J*_{m}, and the integral of Eq. A.1 is then given by

Equation A.2 is rewritten by substitution of Eq. A.3 as

The integral of Eq. A.4 from the droplet surface at *r*_{s} to a distance *r* is

where *f*_{s} is the mixture fraction at the droplet surface. The boundary condition of *f* at the droplet surface is given by

where *f*_{d} is the mass fraction of the evaporating fuel in the droplet and it equals 1 for a single component droplet. Substituting Eq. A.6 into Eq. A.5 yields

The scalar dissipation *N*_{f} can be derived using Eq. A.7 as

The PDF of mixture fraction is evaluated by an identity formula

where *c* is the droplet number density. Equation A.9 is rewritten with the substitution of Eq. A.8, viz.

It is important to note that the identity in Eq. A.9 assumes lack of interaction between the mixing fields of the different droplets and accounts for multiple droplets by simple multiplication by *c*. This will be - as shown in this paper - a sufficiently accurate approximation for dilute sprays but will lead to larger inaccuracies for *P*_{f} with *f* smaller than the average mixture fraction value, \(f < \tilde {f}\), if the droplet loading is high as for these values the mixing fields will interact.

## Rights and permissions

## About this article

### Cite this article

Wang, B., Kronenburg, A. & Stein, O.T. Modelling Sub-Grid Passive Scalar Statistics in Moderately Dense Evaporating Sprays.
*Flow Turbulence Combust* **103**, 519–535 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-019-00024-0

Received:

Accepted:

Published:

Issue Date:

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-019-00024-0

### Keywords

- DNS
- Turbulent sprays
- Mixture fraction
- Scalar dissipation