Flow, Turbulence and Combustion

, Volume 76, Issue 2, pp 199–219 | Cite as

Presumed Mapping Functions for Eulerian Modelling of Turbulent Mixing

  • Mikael MortensenEmail author
  • Bengt Andersson


The mapping closure of Chen et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett., 63, 1989] is a transported probability density function (PDF) method that has proven very efficient for modelling of turbulent mixing in homogeneous turbulence. By utilizing a Gaussian reference field, the solution to the mapping function (in homogeneous turbulence) can be found analytically for a range of initial conditions common for turbulent combustion applications, e.g. for binary or trinary mixing. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the possibility of making this solution a presumed mapping function (PMF) for inhomogeneous flows. The PMF in turn will imply a presumed mixture fraction PDF that can be used for a wide range of models in turbulent combustion, e.g. flamelet models, the conditional moment closure (CMC) or large eddy simulations. The true novelty of the paper, though, is in the derivation of highly efficient, closed algebraic expressions for several existing models of conditional statistics, e.g. for the conditional scalar dissipation/diffusion rate or the conditional mean velocity. The closed form expressions nearly eliminates the overhead computational cost that usually is associated with nonlinear models for conditional statistics. In this respect it is argued that the PMF is particularly well suited for CMC that relies heavily on manipulations of the PDF for consistency. The accuracy of the PMF approach is shown with comparison to DNS of a single scalar mixing layer to be better than for the β-PDF. Not only in the shape of the PDF itself, but also for all conditional statistics models computed from the PDF.


presumed mapping functions conditional scalar dissipation rate probability density function scalar mixing turbulence conditional mean velocity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Acklam, P.J., An algorithm for computing the inverse normal cumulative distribution function (2005).
  2. 2.
    Baldyga, J. and Bourne, D., Turbulent Mixing and Chemical Reactions. New York: Wiley, (1999).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barlow, R.S. and Frank, J.H., Effects of turbulence on species mass fractions in methane/air jet flames. In: 27th Symposium (International) on Combustion Boulder. pp. 1087–1095, (1998).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bilger, R.W., Turbulent flows with nonpremixed reactants. In: Libby, P.A. and Williams F.A., (eds.), Topics in Applied Physics Number 44: Turbulent Reacting Flows New York: Springer, Chapt 3 65–113, (1980).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buch, K.A. and Dahm W.J.A., Experimental-study of the fine-scale structure of conserved scalar mixing in turbulent shear flows. Part I: Sc ≫ 1. J. Fluid Mech, 317 (1996) 21–71.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cha, C. and Trouillet, P., A model for the mixing time scale of a turbulent reacting scalar. Phys. Fluids 15 (2003a) 1375–1380.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cha, C. and Trouillet, P., A subgrid-scale mixing model for large-eddy simulations of turbulent reacting flows using the filtered density function. Phys. Fluids 15 (2003b) 1496–1504.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, H., Chen, S. and Kraichnan, R.H., Probability distribution of a stochastically advected scalar field. Phys. Rev. Lett 63 (1989) 2657.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cody, W.J., Rational chebyshev approximations for the error function. Mathematics of Computation pp. 631–637, (1969).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    de Bruyn Kops, S.M. and Mortensen, M., Conditional mixing statistics in a self-similar scalar mixing layer. Phys. Fluids 17 (2005) 095107.CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Bruyn Kops, S.M. and Riley, J.J., Direct numerical simulation of laboratory experiments in isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 10(9) (1998) 2125–2127.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    de Bruyn Kops, S.M. and Riley, J.J., Re-examining the thermal mixing layer with numerical simulations. Phys. Fluids 12(1) (2000) 185–192.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    de Bruyn Kops, S.M., Riley, J.J., Kosály, G. and Cook A.W., Investigation of modelling for non-premixed turbulent combustion. Flow, Turb. and Comb 60(1) (1998) 105–122.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fox, R.O., Computational Models for Turbulent Reacting Flows. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (2003).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gao, F., Mapping closure and non-Gaussianity of the scalar probability density functions in isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids A 3 (1991) 2438–2444.zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gao, F. and O'Brien, E.E., A large-eddy simulation scheme for turbulent reacting flows. Phys. Fluids A 5 (1993) 1282–1284.zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Girimaji, S.S., A mapping closure for turbulent scalar mixing using a time-evolving reference field. Phys. Fluids A 4 (1992a) 2875–2886.zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Girimaji, S.S., On the modelling of scalar diffusion in isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids A 4 (1992b) 2529–2537.zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jiang, T.L., Givi, P. and Gao, F., Binary and trinary scalar mixing by Fickian diffusion-Some mapping closure results. Phys. Fluids A 4 (1992) 1028–1035.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kerstein, A.R., Flapping model of scalar mixing in turbulence. Phys. Fluids A 3 (1991) 2838–2840.zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kimura, Y. and Kraichnan, R.H., Statistics of an advected passive scalar. Phys. Fluids A 5 (1993) 2264–2277.zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Klimenko, A.Y. and Bilger, R.W., Conditional moment closure for turbulent combustion. Progress in Energy And Combustion Science 25 (1999) 595–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Klimenko, A.Y. and Pope, S.B., The modelling of turbulent reactive flows based on multiple mapping conditioning. Phys. Fluids 15 (2003) 1907.CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kuznetsov, V.R. and Sabel'nikov, V.A., Turbulence and Combustion. New York: Hemisphere. (1990).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li, J.D. and Bilger, R.W., A simple theory of conditional mean velocity in turbulent scalar-mixing layer. Phys. Fluids 6(2) (1994) 605–610.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ma, B.K. and Warhaft, Z., Some aspects of the thermal mixing layer in grid turbulence. Phys. Fluids 29(10) (1986) 3114–3120.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Madnia, C.K., Frankel, S.H. and Givi, P., Reactant conversion in homogeneous turbulence: Mathematical modeling, Computational validations, and practical applications. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dynamics 4 (1992) 79–93.zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mortensen, M., Consistent modelling of scalar mixing for presumed multiple parameter probability density functions. Phys. Fluids 17 (2005a) 018106.CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mortensen, M., Mathematical modelling of turbulent reactive flows. Ph.D. thesis, Chalmers University of Technology (2005b).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    O'Brien, E.E., Probability density function (pdf) approach to reacting turbulent flows. In: Libby, P.A. and Williams, F. A., (eds.), Topics in Applied Physics. Berlin: Springer (1980).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    O'Brien, E.E. and Jiang, T.L., The conditional dissipation rate of an initially binary scalar. Phys. Fluids A 3 (1991) 3121.zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Peters, N., Laminar diffusion flamelet models in non-premixed turbulent combustion. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci 10 (1984) 319–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Peters, N., Turbulent Combustion. Cambridge University Press (2000).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pope, S., PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 11 (1985) 119–192.CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pope, S.B., Probability distributions of scalars in turbulent shear flows. In: Turbulent Shear Flows 2. Berlin (1980) pp. 7–17.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pope, S.B., Mapping closures for turbulent mixing and reaction. Theor. and Comp. Fluid Dynamics 2 (1991) 255–270.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pope, S.B., Turbulent Flows. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2000).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A. and Vetterling, W.T., Numerical Recipes. New York: Cambridge University Press (1986).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tsai, K. and Fox, R.O., Modelling multiple reactive scalar mixing with the generalized IEM model. Phys. Fluids 7 (1995) 2820–2830.zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic EngineeringThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Chemical and Biological EngineeringChalmers University of TechnologyGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations