Skip to main content
Log in

Molecular phylogeny of Eupodidae reveals that the family Cocceupodidae (Actinotrichida; Eupodoidea) and its genus Filieupodes are valid taxa

  • Published:
Experimental and Applied Acarology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The family Eupodidae is one of eight families belonging to the superfamily Eupodoidea. Although the Eupodidae are very common mites, they are still poorly investigated and the systematic parameters of the family are vague with unclear intrafamilial relationships between its genera. According to the hypothesis of Jesionowska (Genus 21(4):637–658, 2010), the eupodid genera Cocceupodes, Linopodes and her new genus Filieupodes should be transferred from the Eupodidae to a separate family named Cocceupodidae. The opposite hypothesis of Khaustov (ZooKeys 422:11–22, 2014) considers the family Cocceupodidae an artificial taxon and the genus Filieupodes a junior synonym of Cocceupodes and assignes the family Eupodidae its primary definition. Here, we present the first molecular reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships within the Eupodidae. We test the taxonomic status of the Eupodidae and refer to the previous hypotheses based on morphological data. According to the reconstructed phylogram based on nuclear (18S + 28S rDNA) and mitochondrial (COI) sequences as well as morphological characters tracing this analysis, we have concluded that: (1) the genera Linopodes, Filieupodes and Cocceupodes are a separate monophyletic lineage of familial rank and the sister group of Eupodidae s.s., and (2) the genus Filieupodes should be considered a separate genus being a sister group of the Linopodes-Cocceupodes clade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abou-Awad BA (1984) The Eupodid mites of Egypt (Acari, Eupodoidea, Eupodidae). Acarologia 25(4):329–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Abou-Awad BA, El-Bagoury ME (1984) Two new species of genus Cocceupodes in Egypt (Acari: Eupodoidea: Eupodidae). Bull Zool Soc Egypt 34:68–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker (1987) Caleupodes, a new genus of eupodoid mite (Acari: Acariformes) showing primary opisthosomal segmentation. Bull Br Museum (Nat Hist) 53:103–113. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.4952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker AS (1990) A survey of external morphology of mites of the superfamily Eupodoidea Banks, 1894 (Acari: Acariformes). J Nat Hist 24:1227–1261. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222939000770741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker AS, Lindquist EE (2002) Aethosolenia laselvensis gen. n., sp. n., a new eupodoid mite from Costa Rica (Acari: Prostigmata). Syst Appl Acarol Spec Publ 11:1–11. https://doi.org/10.11158/saasp.11.1.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabert J, Ehrnsberger R, Dabert M (2008) Glaucalges tytonis sp. n. (Analgoidea, Xolalgidae) from the barn owl Tyto alba (Strigiformes, Tytonidae): compiling morphology with DNA barcode data for taxon descriptions in mites (Acari). Zootaxa 1719:41–52. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.181058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabert M, Witalinski W, Kazmierski A, Olszanowski Z, Dabert J (2010) Molecular phylogeny of acariform mites (Acari, Arachnida): Strong conflict between phylogenetic signal and long-branch attraction artifacts. Mol Phylogenet Evol 56:222–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2009.12.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dabert M, Proctor H, Dabert J (2016) Higher-level molecular phylogeny of the water mites (Acariformes: Prostigmata: Parasitengonina: Hydrachnidiae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 101:75–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.05.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D (2012) jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods 9(8):772. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fain A (1958) Un nouvel Acarien Trombidiforme parasitant les fosses nasals d’un Serpent au Ruanda-Urundi. Rev Zool Bot Afr 57:177–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guindon S, Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast and accurate method to estimate large phylogenies by maximum-likelihood. Syst Biol 52:696–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150390235520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jesionowska K (2005) Morfologia Cocceupodes mollicellus Koch, 1838 (Actinotrichida, Actinedida, Eupodidae) z Polski. Acta Biologica 12:35–48. (Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego no 411, in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesionowska K (2010) Cocceupodidae, a new family of eupodoid mites, with description of a new genus and two new species from Poland. Part I. (Acari: Prostigmata: Eupodoidea). Genus 21(4):637–658

    Google Scholar 

  • Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 4:772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khaustov AA (2014) A new genus and species in the mite family Eupodidae (Acari, Eupodoidea) from Crimea. ZooKeys 422:11–22. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.422.7802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaustov AA (2016) Rediagnosis of the genus Niveupodes Barilo, 1991 (Acari: Eupodidae) with the redescription of Niveupodes niveus Barilo. Int J Acarol 42(5):258–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647954.2016.1183044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaustov A (2017) A new genus and species of Eupodidae (Acari: Eupodoidea) from mosses in Crimea. Acarina 25(1):29–44. https://doi.org/10.21684/0132-8077-2017-25-1-29-44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimov BP, OConnor BM, Chetverikov PE, Bolton SJ, Pepato AR, Mortazavia AL, Tolstikov AV, Bauchan GR, Ochoa R (2018) Comprehensive phylogeny of acariform mites (Acariformes) provides insights on the origin of the four-legged mites (Eriophyoidea), a long branch. Mol Phylogenet Evol 119:105–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2017.10.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist EE, Zacharda M (1987) A new genus and species of Rhagidiidae (Acari: Prostigmata) from Chihuahuan Desert litter in New Mexico. Can J Zool 65:2149–2158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddison WP, Maddison DR (2014) Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 3.0. http://mesquiteproject.org. Accessed 16 June 2019

  • Mironov SV, Dabert J, Dabert M (2012) A new feather mite species of the genus Proctophyllodes Robin, 1877 (Astigmata: Proctophyllodidae) from the long-tailed tit Aegithalos caudatus (Passeriformes: Aegithalidae)-morphological description with DNA Barcode Data. Zootaxa 3253:54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivier PAS, Theron PD (1997) The genus Benoinyssus Fain (Acari: Eupodidae) from southern Africa, with descriptions of five new species Olivier. Afr Entomol 5(2):301–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivier PAS, Theron PD (1998) The genus Eupodes Koch, 1835 (Acari: Prostigmata: Eupodidae) from southern African soil and vegetation. Part 1. Characterisation of the genus, designation of the type species and descriptions of three new species. Koedoe 40(1):57–73. https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v40i2.273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oudemans AC (1931) Acarologische aanteekeningen CVIII. Entomologische Berichten (Amsterdam) 8:251–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin TK (1996) A review and cladistic analysis of the Eupodoidea (Acari: Acariformes). Syst Appl Acarol 1:77–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin TK, Halliday B (1997) Eriorhynchidae, a new family of Prostigmata (Acarina), with a cladistics analysis of eupodoid species of Australia and New Zealand. Syst Entomol 22:151–171. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3113.1997.d01-27.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rambaut A (2014) FigTree v. 1.4.2. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/. Accessed 16 August 2019

  • Rambaut A, Drummond AJ (2007) Tracer v1.4. http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer. Accessed 16 Aug 2019

  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol 61:539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Skoracka A, Dabert M (2009) The cereal rust mite Abacarus hystrix (Acari: Eriophyoidea) is a complex of species: evidence from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Bull Entomol Res 100:263–272. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485309990216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strandtmann RW, Goff ML (1978) The Eupodoidea of Hawaii (Acarina: Prostigmata). Pac Insects 19:121–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Strandtmann RW, Prasse J (1977) Prostigmatic mites from the Experimental Farm in Etzdorf/Saalkreis, GDR. Abh Ber Naturkundemus Görlitz 50(2):1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL (2003) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Telford MJ, Lockyer AE, Cartwright-Finch C, Littlewood DTJ (2003) Combined large and small subunit ribosomal RNA phylogenies support a basal position of the acoelomorph flatworms. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 270(1519):1077–1083. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walter DE, Lindquist EE, Smith IM, Cook DR, Krantz GW (2009) Order Trombidiformes. Chapter 13. In: Krantz GW, Walter DE (eds) A manual of acarology. Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock, pp 233–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacharda M (1979) Strandtmanniidae—a new family of Eupodoidea (Acarina: Prostigmata). Věstník Československé společnosti zoologické 63:76–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwickl DJ (2006) Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence data sets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Dissertation, The University of Texas, Austin

Download references

Acknowledgements

The funding for this work came from the National Science Centre—Poland, Grant #2014/13/B/NZ8/04679 (JD) and Dean's grant of Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, GDWB-04/2017 (NST).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalia Szudarek-Trepto.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Szudarek-Trepto, N., Kaźmierski, A., Dabert, M. et al. Molecular phylogeny of Eupodidae reveals that the family Cocceupodidae (Actinotrichida; Eupodoidea) and its genus Filieupodes are valid taxa. Exp Appl Acarol 80, 43–57 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-019-00455-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-019-00455-4

Keywords

Navigation