Experimental and Applied Acarology

, Volume 77, Issue 1, pp 59–64 | Cite as

Fatal attraction: lone star ticks (Amblyomma americanum) exhibit preference for human female breath over male breath

  • Tanya JosekEmail author
  • Allison M. Gardner
  • Tyler J. Hedlund
  • Allison T. Parker
  • Erin Allmann Updyke
  • Brian F. Allan


Ticks use a variety of chemical cues to locate hosts, the main cue being carbon dioxide, which is exhaled by hosts. This study sought to experimentally determine whether ticks exhibit preference among human hosts based on host sex, as the chemical components of human male and female breath have been shown to differ. We focused on the lone star tick, Amblyomma americanum, due to its importance as a disease vector in the United States and its active host-seeking behavior. To test the hypothesis that ticks exhibit preference based upon host sex, we conducted a binary choice behavioral bioassay. Male and female human volunteers (n = 20 pairs) breathed into opposite sides of a secured polycarbonate tube containing 10 adult A. americanum and the proportion of ticks that exhibited a host preference was recorded. We found that under controlled conditions, human females attract a significantly larger proportion of ticks than males. Possible mechanisms to explain these results include that (1) female breath contains components that ticks find attractive, and/or (2) male breath contains a repellent chemical component.


Lone star tick Amblyomma americanum Host preference Tick biology 



We thank all of the volunteers who participated in this experiment and members of the Allan lab who provided helpful feedback on this manuscript.


  1. Carr AL, Roe RM, Arellano C, Sonenshine DE, Schal C, Apperson CS (2013) Responses of Amblyomma americanum and Dermacentor variabilis to odorants that attract haematophagous insects. Med Vet Entomol 27:86–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Curran AM, Rabin SI, Prada PA, Furton KG (2005) Comparison of the volatile organic compounds present in human odor using SPME-GC/MS. J Chem Ecol 31:1607–1619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Doty RL, Green PA, Ram C, Yankell SL (1982) Communication of gender from human breath odors: relationship to perceived intensity and pleasantness. Horm Behav 16:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Havlicek J, Lenochova P (2006) The effect of meat consumption on body odor attractiveness. Chem Senses 31:747–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Havlicek J, Lenochova P (2008) Environmental effects on human body odour. Chem Signals Vertebr 11:199–210Google Scholar
  6. Himeidan YE, Elbashir MI, Adam I (2004) Attractiveness of pregnant women to the malaria vector, Anopheles arabiensis, in Sudan. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 98:631–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Knols B, GJ R, Jong, Takken W (1995) Differential attractiveness of isolated humans to mosquitoes in Tanzania. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 89:604–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lefèvre T, Gouagna LC, Dabiré KR, Elguero E, Fontenille D, Renaud F, Costantini C, Thomas F (2010) Beer consumption increases human attractiveness to malaria mosquitoes. PloS one 5:e9546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lindsay S, Ansell J, Selman C, Cox V, Hamilton K, Walraven G (2000) Effect of pregnancy on exposure to malaria mosquitoes. Lancet. 355: 1972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Maekawa E, Aonuma H, Nelson B, Yoshimura A, Tokunaga F, Fukumoto S, Kanuka H (2011) The role of proboscis of the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles stephensi in host-seeking behavior. Parasites Vectors 4:4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ogimoto Y, Selyanchyn R, Takahara N, Wakamatsu S, Lee SW (2015) Detection of ammonia in human breath using quartz crystal microbalance sensors with functionalized mesoporous SiO2 nanoparticle films. Sens Actuators B 215:428–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Popov TA (2011) Human exhaled breath analysis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 106:451–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ramírez CC, Fuentes-Contreras E, Rodríguez LC, Niemeyer HM (2000) Pseudoreplication and its frequency in olfactometric laboratory studies. J Chem Ecol 26:1423–1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schulze TL, Jordan RA, Hung RW (1997) Biases associated with several sampling methods used to estimate abundance of Ixodes scapularis and Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae). J Med Entomol 34:615–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schulze TL, Jordan RA, Hung RW (2001) Effects of selected meteorological factors on diurnal questing of Ixodes scapularis and Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae). J Med Entomol 38:318–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shaw MT, Keesing F, McGrail R, Ostfeld RS (2003) Factors influencing the distribution of larval blacklegged ticks on rodent hosts. Am J Trop Med Hyg 68:447–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sheel AW, Richards JC, Foster GE, Guenette JA (2004) Sex differences in respiratory exercise physiology. Sports Med 34(9):567–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sonenshine DE (2004) Pheromones and other semiochemicals of ticks and their use in tick control. Parasitology 129:S405–S425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Taneja J, Guerin PM (1995) Oriented responses of the triatomine bugs Rhodnius prolixus and Triatoma infestans to vertebrate odours on a servosphere. J Comp Physiol A Sens Neural Behav Physiol 176:455–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Xu C, Nielsen PV, Gong G, Liu L, Jensen RL (2015) Measuring the exhaled breath of a manikin and human subjects. Indoor Air 25:188–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EntomologyUniversity of Illinois Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations