Preventing introduction and spread of Dermanyssus gallinae in poultry facilities using the HACCP method
Preventing the establishment of ectoparasitic poultry red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae) populations is key in ensuring welfare and egg production of laying hens and absence of allergic reactions of workers in poultry facilities. Using the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point method, a panel of experts identified hazards and associated risks concerning the introduction and spread of this mite in poultry facilities. Together we provide an overview of possible corrective actions that can be taken to prevent population establishment. Additionally, a checklist of the most critical control points has been devised as management tool for poultry farmers. This list was evaluated by Dutch and British poultry farmers. They found the checklist feasible and useful.
KeywordsControl Corrective actions Monitoring Checklist Risks Farm processes
This research was funded by the Dutch Product Board for Poultry and Eggs and the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality. We are grateful to T. Fiks-Van Niekerk, R. van Emous and B. Reuvekamp (Animal Sciences Group, Wageningen University) for their knowledgeable contribution to this research. We would like to thank all Dutch and British farmers that participated in the evaluation of the checklist. We also thank B. Bell (ADAS) for testing the checklist during her course for poultry farmers on D. gallinae.
- Kijlstra A, Meerburg BG, Mul M (2004) Animal-friendly production systems may cause re-emergence of Toxoplasma gondii. NJAS-Wag J Life Sci 52(2):119–132Google Scholar
- Marangi M, Giangaspero A, Raele D, Assunta Cafiero M, Camarda A, Sparagano OAE (2008). Evaluation of poultry red mite susceptibility, Dermanyssus gallinae (Acarina: Dermanyssidae), to some acaricides in Italy. In: Abstracts of the BSP Spring, Trypanosomiasis/Leishmaniasis & Malaria Meetings. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK 168, 30 March, 2 AprilGoogle Scholar
- Maurer V, Hertzberg H (2001) Ökologische Legehennenhaltung. Was tun die kleinen Vampire? DGS-Mag 40:49–52Google Scholar
- Maurer V, Perler E (2006). Silicas for control of the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae. Paper presented at the Joint Organic Congress, Odense, Denmark, 30–31 May (http://orgprints.org/7274/01/Maurer_Dermanyssus_Odense.pdf)
- Maurer V, Baumgärtner J, Bieri M, Fölsch DW (1993) The occurrence of the chicken mite Dermanyssus gallinae in Swiss poultry houses. Mitt Schweiz Entomol Ges 66:87–97Google Scholar
- Moro CV, Chauve C, Zenner L (2005) Vectorial role of some Dermanyssoid mites (Acari, Mesostigmata, Dermanyssoidea). Parasite 12:99–109Google Scholar
- Mouchtouri VA, Anagnostopoulou R, Samanidou-Voyadjoglou A, Theodoridou K, Hatzoglou C, Kremastinou J, Hadjichristodoulou C (2008) Surveillance study of vector species on board passenger ships risk factors related to infestations. BMC Public Health 8:100. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-100 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mul M, Van der Gaag M (2003). Control of Salmonella at pig finishing farms with a farm decision tree. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on the Epidemiology and Control of Foodborn Pathogens in Pork, Crete, Greece, 149–151Google Scholar
- Nordenfors H (2000). Epidemiology and control of the Poultry Red Mite, Dermanyssus gallinae. Doctoral thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden, 19–20Google Scholar
- Steenberg T, Kilpinen O, Jespersen JB, Soler-Cruz MD, Vega-Robles C, Birkett M, Dewhirst S, Pickett J (2005) Advances in the development of novel control methods against chicken mites (Dermanyssus gallinae). Bull-OILB/SROP 28:89–91Google Scholar
- Wood HP (1917). The chicken mite: its life history and habits. USDA Bulletin No. 553Google Scholar