Experimental and Applied Acarology

, Volume 48, Issue 1–2, pp 167–181 | Cite as

Preventing introduction and spread of Dermanyssus gallinae in poultry facilities using the HACCP method

  • Monique F. Mul
  • Constantianus J. M. Koenraadt


Preventing the establishment of ectoparasitic poultry red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae) populations is key in ensuring welfare and egg production of laying hens and absence of allergic reactions of workers in poultry facilities. Using the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point method, a panel of experts identified hazards and associated risks concerning the introduction and spread of this mite in poultry facilities. Together we provide an overview of possible corrective actions that can be taken to prevent population establishment. Additionally, a checklist of the most critical control points has been devised as management tool for poultry farmers. This list was evaluated by Dutch and British poultry farmers. They found the checklist feasible and useful.


Control Corrective actions Monitoring Checklist Risks Farm processes 



This research was funded by the Dutch Product Board for Poultry and Eggs and the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality. We are grateful to T. Fiks-Van Niekerk, R. van Emous and B. Reuvekamp (Animal Sciences Group, Wageningen University) for their knowledgeable contribution to this research. We would like to thank all Dutch and British farmers that participated in the evaluation of the checklist. We also thank B. Bell (ADAS) for testing the checklist during her course for poultry farmers on D. gallinae.


  1. Baselga E, Drolet BA, Esterly NB (1996) Avian mite dermatitis. Pediatrics 97(5):743–745PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonde MJ, Sørensen JT (2004) Herd health management in organic pig production using a quality assurance system based on hazard analysis and critical control Points. NJAS-Wag J Life Sci 52:133–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chauve CM (1998) The poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae (De Geer, 1778) : current situation and future prospects for control. Vet Parasitol 79:239–245. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(98)00167-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chirico J, Tauson R (2001) Traps containing acaricides for the control of Dermanyssus gallinae. Vet Parasitol 110:109–116. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00310-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hegelund L, Sørensen JT (2007) Developing a HACCP-like system for improving animal health and welfare in organic egg production—based on an expert panel analysis. Animal 1:1018–1025. doi: 10.1017/S1751731107000213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kijlstra A, Meerburg BG, Mul M (2004) Animal-friendly production systems may cause re-emergence of Toxoplasma gondii. NJAS-Wag J Life Sci 52(2):119–132Google Scholar
  7. Kilpinen O, Roepstorff A, Permin A, Nørgaard-Nielsen G, Lawson LG, Simonsen HB (2005) Influence of Dermanyssus gallinae and Ascaridia galli infections on behaviour and health of lying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Br Poult Sci 45(1):26–34. doi: 10.1080/00071660400023839 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lundh J, Wiktelius D, Chirico J (2005) Azadirachtin-impregnated traps for the control of Dermanyssus gallinae. Vet Parasitol 130:337–342. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.02.012 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Marangi M, Giangaspero A, Raele D, Assunta Cafiero M, Camarda A, Sparagano OAE (2008). Evaluation of poultry red mite susceptibility, Dermanyssus gallinae (Acarina: Dermanyssidae), to some acaricides in Italy. In: Abstracts of the BSP Spring, Trypanosomiasis/Leishmaniasis & Malaria Meetings. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK 168, 30 March, 2 AprilGoogle Scholar
  10. Maurer V, Hertzberg H (2001) Ökologische Legehennenhaltung. Was tun die kleinen Vampire? DGS-Mag 40:49–52Google Scholar
  11. Maurer V, Perler E (2006). Silicas for control of the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae. Paper presented at the Joint Organic Congress, Odense, Denmark, 30–31 May (
  12. Maurer V, Baumgärtner J, Bieri M, Fölsch DW (1993) The occurrence of the chicken mite Dermanyssus gallinae in Swiss poultry houses. Mitt Schweiz Entomol Ges 66:87–97Google Scholar
  13. Mayes T (1993) The application of management systems to food safety and quality. Trends Food Sci Technol 4:216–219. doi: 10.1016/0924-2244(93)90154-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mayes T (1998) Risk analysis in HACCP: burden or benefit? Food Contr 9:171–176. doi: 10.1016/S0956-7135(97)00055-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moro CV, Chauve C, Zenner L (2005) Vectorial role of some Dermanyssoid mites (Acari, Mesostigmata, Dermanyssoidea). Parasite 12:99–109Google Scholar
  16. Mouchtouri VA, Anagnostopoulou R, Samanidou-Voyadjoglou A, Theodoridou K, Hatzoglou C, Kremastinou J, Hadjichristodoulou C (2008) Surveillance study of vector species on board passenger ships risk factors related to infestations. BMC Public Health 8:100. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-100 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mul M, Van der Gaag M (2003). Control of Salmonella at pig finishing farms with a farm decision tree. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on the Epidemiology and Control of Foodborn Pathogens in Pork, Crete, Greece, 149–151Google Scholar
  18. Noordhuizen JPTM, Frankena K (1999) Epidemiology and quality assurance: applications at farm level. Prev Vet Med 39:93–110. doi: 10.1016/S0167-5877(98)00151-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nordenfors H (2000). Epidemiology and control of the Poultry Red Mite, Dermanyssus gallinae. Doctoral thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden, 19–20Google Scholar
  20. Nordenfors H, Chirico J (2001) Evaluation of a sampling trap for Dermanyssus gallinae (Acari: Dermanyssidae). J Econ Entomol 94:1617–1621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nordenfors H, Höglund J, Tauson R, Chirico J (2001) Effect of permethrin impregnated plastic strips on Dermanyssus gallinae in loose-housing systems for laying hens. Vet Parasitol 102:121–131. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(01)00528-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rayment GE (2006) Australian efforts to prevent the accidental movement of pests and diseases in soil and plant samples. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 37:2107–2117. doi: 10.1080/00103620600817069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sikes RK, Chamberlain RW (1954) Laboratory observations on three species of bird mites. J Parasitol 40:691–697. doi: 10.2307/3273713 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Steenberg T, Kilpinen O, Jespersen JB, Soler-Cruz MD, Vega-Robles C, Birkett M, Dewhirst S, Pickett J (2005) Advances in the development of novel control methods against chicken mites (Dermanyssus gallinae). Bull-OILB/SROP 28:89–91Google Scholar
  25. Stetter J, Lieb F (2000) Innovation in crop protection: trends in research. Angew Chem Int Ed 39:1724–1744. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(20000515)39:10<;1724::AID-ANIE1724>;3.0.CO;2-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sun YM, Ockerman HW (2005) A review of the needs and current applications of hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) system in foodservice areas. Food Contr 16:325–332. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2004.03.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wood HP (1917). The chicken mite: its life history and habits. USDA Bulletin No. 553Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monique F. Mul
    • 1
  • Constantianus J. M. Koenraadt
    • 2
  1. 1.Animal ProductionAnimal Sciences Group of Wageningen URLelystadThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Laboratory of Entomology, Department of Plant SciencesWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations