Negative ties and gender (as a contextual variable) have remained under-studied in the social networks research in management. Drawing on occupational gender-typing theory, the paper hypothesizes that the relationship between indegree centrality of employees in a positive ties-based network and their tendency to cite their colleagues in negative ties differs in a feminine and a masculine occupation. Using network data from two organizations in India, the paper shows that in a feminine occupation (nursing), the higher the indegree centrality of the employees in a positive ties-based network, the less likely are they to cite negative ties whereas, in a masculine occupation (mining), the higher the indegree centrality of the employees in a positive ties-based network, more likely are they to cite negative ties. We make a theoretical contribution by extending the occupational gender-typing theory in social networks research by theorizing and examining the distinctive effects of the context – feminine and masculine occupations – on networks and work relations. We also discuss the managerial implications of the study.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.
Acker, J. 1990. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2): 139–158.
Ashcraft, K. L. 2013. The glass slipper: “Incorporating” occupational identity in management studies. Academy of Management Review, 38(1): 6–31.
Balkundi, P., Kilduff, M., & Harrison, D. A. 2011. Centrality and charisma: Comparing how leader networks and attributions affect team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6): 1209–1222.
Banerjee, D., & Doshi, V. 2020. Gender, workplace support, and perceived job demands in the US and Indian context. Personnel Review, 49(7): 1451–1465.
Barbulescu, R., & Bidwell, M. J. 2013. Do women choose different jobs from men? Mechanisms of application segregation in the market for managerial workers. Organization Science, 24(3): 737–756.
Becker, T. E. 2005. Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8(3): 274–289.
Belitski, M., & Desai, S. 2019. Female ownership, firm age and firm growth: A study of south Asian firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09689-7.
Belliveau, M. A. 2005. Blind ambitions? The effects of social networks and institutional sex composition on the job search outcomes of elite coeducational and women’s college graduates. Organization Science, 16(2): 134–150.
Bhardwaj, A., Qureshi, I., Konrad, A. M., & Lee, S. H. 2015. A two-wave study of self-monitoring personality, social network churn, and in-degree centrality in close friendship and general socializing networks. Group & Organization Management, 41(1): 526–559.
Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. 2003. The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6): 991–1013.
Brands, R. A., Menges, J. I., & Kilduff, M. 2015. The leader-in-social-network schema: Perceptions of network structure affect gendered attributions of charisma. Organization Science, 26(4): 1210–1225.
Brands, R. A., & Mehra, A. 2019. Gender, brokerage, and performance: A construal approach. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2): 196–219.
Brass, D. J. 1985. Men’s and women’s networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2): 27–43.
Britton, D. M. 2000. The epistemology of the gendered organization. Gender and Society, 14(3): 418–434.
Burt, R. S. 1998. The gender of social capital. Rationality and Society, 10(1): 5–46.
Carboni, I., & Ehrlich, K. 2013. The effect of relational and team characteristics on individual performance: A social network perspective. Human Resource Management, 52(4): 11–535.
Cardador, M. T. 2017. Promoted up but also out? The unintended consequences of increasing women’s representation in managerial roles in engineering. Organization Science, 28(4): 597–780.
Carlson, K. D., & Wu, J. 2012. The illusion of statistical control: Control variable practice in management research. Organizational Research Methods, 15(3): 413–435.
Cejka, M. A., & Eagly, A. H. 1999. Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(4): 413–423.
Chandrashekaran, S., Sanyal, D., Tripathy, S., & Jain, T. 2020. Breaking through the old boys club: The rise of women in the lower judiciary. Economic & Political Weekly, 4: 33–40.
Cheung, H. K., Goldberg, C. B., Konrad, A. M., Lindsey, A., Nicolaides, V., & Yang, Y. 2020. A meta-analytic review of gender composition influencing employees’ work outcomes: Implications for human resource development. Human Resource Development International, 23(5): 491–518.
Chiu, C., Balkundi, P., Owens, B. P., & Tesluk, P. E. 2020. Shaping positive and negative ties to improve team effectiveness: The roles of leader humility and team helping norms. Human Relations: 001872672096813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726720968135.
Cockburn, C. 1988. The gendering of jobs: Workplace relations and the reproduction of sex segregation. In S. Walby (Ed.). Gender segregation at work: 29–42. Open University Press.
Collins, J. C. 2014. Characteristics of “masculinized” industries: Gay men as a provocative exception to male privilege and gendered rules. Human Resource Development Review, 14(4): 415–441.
Cooke, F. L., & Xiao, Y. 2013. Gender roles and organizational HR practices: The case of women’s careers in accountancy and consultancy firms in China. Human Resource Management, 53(1): 23–44.
Cottingham, M. D. 2016. Theorizing emotional capital. Theory & Society, 45(5): 451–470.
Derks, B., Ellemers, N., van Laar, C., & de Groot, K. 2011. Do sexist organizational cultures create the queen bee? British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3): 519–535.
Diekman, A. B., & Goodfriend, W. 2006. Rolling with the changes: A role congruity perspective on gender norms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(4): 369–383.
Eagly, A. H. 1987. Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ely, R. J. 1995. The power in demography: Women's social constructions of gender identity at work. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3): 589–634.
Ely, R. J., & Padavic, I. 2007. A feminist analysis of organizational research on sex differences. Academy of Management Review, 32(4): 1121–1143.
Ely, R. J., & Meyerson, D. (2008). Unmasking manly men. Harvard Business Review, July–August.
Faris, R., & Felmlee, D. 2011. Status struggles: Network centrality and gender segregation in same- and cross-gender aggression. American Sociological Review, 76(1): 48–73.
Fernandez, R. M., & Sosa, M. L. 2005. Gendering the job: Networks and recruitment at a call Centre. American Journal of Sociology, 111(3): 859–904.
Freeman, L. C. 1979. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1: 215–239.
Gascoigne, C., Parry, E., & Buchanan, D. 2015. Extreme work, gendered work? How extreme jobs and the discourse of ‘personal choice’ perpetuate gender inequality. Organization, 22(4): 457–475.
Glick, P., Wilk, K., & Perreault, M. 1995. Images of occupations: Components of gender status in occupational stereotypes. Sex Roles, 32(9-10): 565–582.
Harrigan, N. M., Labianca, G. J., & Agneessens, F. 2020. Negative ties and signed graphs research: Stimulating research on dissociative forces in social networks. Social, Networks, 60: 1–10.
Hatton, E. 2014. Mechanisms of gendering: Gender typing and the ideal worker norm in the temporary help industry, 1946–1979. Journal of Gender Studies, 23(4): 440–456.
Hedreen, S. (2019). Gendered jobs are on the decline, but stereotypes remain. Business New Daily. https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/10085-male-female-dominated-jobs.html.
Ho, Y., & Chiu, H. 2013. A social network analysis of leading semiconductor companies’ knowledge flow network. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(4): 1265–1283.
Hochschild, A. R. 1983. The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
Horak, S., Afiouni, F., Bian, Y., Ledeneva, A., Muratbekova-Touron, M., & Fey, C. 2018. Special issue ‘social networks – The dark and bright sides of informal networks’. Management and Organization Review, 14(3): 641–646.
Hsu, I. C., & Lawler, J. J. 2019. An investigation of the relationship between gender composition and organizational performance in Taiwan—The role of task complexity. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36(1): 275–304.
Ibarra, H. 1993. Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 18(1): 56–87.
Jayapal, S. K., & Arulappan, J. 2020. Historical trajectory of men in nursing in India. Open Nursing, 6: 1–10.
Kanter, R. 1977. Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5): 965–990.
Klein, K. J., Lim, B., Saltz, J. L., & Mayer, D. M. 2004. How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6): 952–963.
Krackhardt, D., & Porter, L. W. 1985. When friends leave: A structural analysis of the relationship between turnover and stayer’s attitudes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(June): 242–261.
Krefting, L. A., Berger, P. K., & Wallace, M. J. 1978. The contribution of sex distribution, job content and occupational classification to job sextyping: Two studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 13(2): 181–191.
Kulkarni, S., & Hatekar, N. 2013. Stereotypical occupational segregation and gender inequality: An experimental study. Economic & Political Weekly, 48(32): 112–120.
Kwan, H. K., Yim, F. H.-K., & Zhou, X. 2015. Effects of mentoring on customer orientation: The moderating role of gender. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 53(1): 124–140.
Labianca, G., & Brass, D. 2006. Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 31(3): 596–614.
Labianca, G. 2014. Negative ties in organizational networks. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 40: 239–259.
Lahiri-Dutt, L. 2012. The shifting gender of coal: Feminist musings on women's work in Indian collieries, South Asia. Journal of South Asian Studies, 35(2): 456–476.
Lee, R. T., & Brotheridge, C. M. 2011. Sex and position status differences in workplace aggression. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26(5): 403–418.
Lee, S. H., Cotte, J., & Noseworthy, T. 2016. The role of network centrality in the flow of consumer influence. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20: 66–77.
Mackey, J. D., Roth, P. L., Van Iddekinge, C. H., & McFarland, L. A. 2019. A meta-analysis of gender proportionality effects on job performance. Group & Organization Management, 44(3): 578–610.
Marsden, P. V. 2005. Recent developments in network measurement. In P. J. Carrington, J. Scott, & S. Wasserman (Eds.). Models and methods in social network analysis: 8–30. Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, D. M. (2018). How men get penalized for straying from masculine norms. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2018/10/how-men-get-penalized-for-straying-from-masculine-norms.
McDowell, J. 2015. Masculinity and non-traditional occupation: Men’s talk in women’s work. Gender, Work & Organization, 22(3): 273–291.
McDowell, J. 2020. De-gendering gendered occupations: Analysing professional discourse. Routledge.
McPherson, M., Lynn, S., & Cook, J. M. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1): 415–444.
Merluzzi, J., & Burt, R. S. 2013. How many names are enough? Identifying network effects with the least set of listed contacts. Social Networks, 35(3): 331–337.
Merluzzi, J. 2017. Gender and negative ties: Exploring difficulty work relationships within and across gender. Organization Science, 28(4): 636–652.
Murgatroyd, L. G. 1982. Gender and occupational stratification. Sociological Review, 30(4): 575–602.
Nanda, P. K. 2019. Now, Centre allows women to work in mines. Mint. https://www.livemint.com/news/india/now-centre-allows-women-to-work-in-mines-1549283219461.html.
Oswald, D. L. 2008. Gender stereotypes and women’s reports of liking and ability in traditionally masculine and feminine occupations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(2): 196–203.
Pullen, A., & Simpson, R. 2009. Managing difference in feminized work: Men, otherness and social practice. Human Relations, 62(4): 561–587.
Roos, P. A., & Stevens, L. M. 2018. Integrating occupations: Changing occupational sex segregation in the United States from 2000 to 2014. Demographic Research, 38(5): 127–154.
Rubineau, B., & Fernandez, R. M. 2015. Tipping points: The gender segregating and desegregating effects of network recruitment. Organization Science, 26(6): 1646–1664.
Servon, L. J., & Visser, M. A. 2010. Progress hindered: The retention and advancement of women in science, engineering and technology careers. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(3): 272–284.
Sheppard, L. D., & Aquino, K. 2017. Sisters at arms: A theory of female same-sex conflict and its problematization in organizations. Journal of Management, 43(3): 691–715.
Simon, R. M., Wagner, A., & Killion, B. 2017. Gender and choosing a STEM major in college: Femininity, masculinity, chilly climate, and occupational values. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(3): 299–323.
Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R., Wayne, C. S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. 2001. Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2): 316–325.
United Nations Development Programmes. 2020. Human development report - The next frontier: Human development and the Anthropocence. Retrieved on November 11, 2020, from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr2020.pdf.
Venkataramani, V., Labianca, G., & Grosser, T. J. 2013. Positive and negative workplace relationships, social satisfaction, and organizational attachment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6): 1028–1039.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. 1987. Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2): 125–151.
Williams, M., & Polman, E. 2015. Is it me or her? How gender composition evokes interpersonally sensitive behavior on collaborative cross-boundary projects. Organization Science, 26(2): 334–355.
Wong, S., & Boh, W. F. 2014. The contingent effects of social network sparseness and centrality on managerial innovativeness. Journal of Management Studies, 51(7): 1180–1203.
Wright, R. 1997. Occupational gender in women’s and men’s occupations. Qualitative Sociology, 20(3): 437–442.
Yang, S. W., Trincado, F., Labianca, G., & Agneessens, F. 2019. Negative ties at work. In D. J. Brass, & S. P. Borgatti (Eds.). Social networks at work: 49–78. Routledge.
Zhu, Y., Konrad, A. M., & Jiao, H. 2016. Violation and activation of gender expectations: Do Chinese managerial women face a narrow band of acceptable career guanxi strategies? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(1): 53–86.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Doshi, V., Mukherjee, S. & Yang, Y. Network centrality and negative ties in feminine and masculine occupations. Asia Pac J Manag (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-021-09785-7
- Social networks
- Feminine occupations
- Masculine occupations
- Negative ties; India