Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The influence of managerial optimism and self-regulation on learning and business growth expectations within an emerging economic context

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines psychological and behavioral mechanisms that underlie business growth expectations by examining how managerial optimism and self-regulatory focus influence learning behaviors. To empirically examine these relationships, the study situates in a resource-constrained business context by studying managers in two Pacific Island economies. Results indicate that a positive view toward gains encourages exploratory learning in unknown situations; whereas, a less optimistic disposition and avoidance are related to exploitative learning. This finding is consequential as managerial learning that leans toward development of new insights and possibilities is associated with greater business growth expectations versus learning that adheres to familiar and proven ideas and alternatives. The study results have implications for both practice and theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmadi, S., Khanagha, S., Berchicci, L., & Jansen, J. J. P. 2017. Are managers motivated to explore in the face of a new technological change? The role of regulatory focus, fit, and complexity of decision-making. Journal of Management Studies, 54(2): 209–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audia, P. G., Locke, E. A., & Smith, G. G. 2000. The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5): 837–853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. 1991. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2): 248–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C. I. 1938. The functions of the executive. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. R., & Bird, B. J. 2010. The successful intelligence of high-growth entrepreneurs: Links to new venture growth. Organization Science, 21(2): 397–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., & Gibson, C. 2004. Building ambidexterity into an organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(4): 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briguglio, L. 1995. Small inland developing states and their economic vulnerabilities. World Development, 23(9): 1615–1632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockner, J., Higgins, E. T., & Low, M. B. 2004. Regulatory focus theory and the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2): 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. 2014. Review: Dispositional optimism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18: 293–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Segerstrom, S. C. 2010. Optimism. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7): 879–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIA World Factbook. 2016a. The world factbook: Fiji. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/fj.html, Accessed May 31, 2017.

  • CIA World Factbook. 2016b. The world factbook: Tonga. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/tn.html, Accessed May 31, 2017.

  • Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. 1997. Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2): 117–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Noni, I., & Apa, R. 2015. The moderating effect of exploitative and exploratory learning on internationalisation-performance relationship in SMEs. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 13(2): 96–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. 2009. Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. 2001. The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6): 1001–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gundry, L. K., & Welsch, H. P. 2001. The ambitious entrepreneur: High growth strategies of women-owned enterprises. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5): 453–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. 2006. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4): 693–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. 2010. Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C. 2007. Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2): 334–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2): 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haws, K. L., Dholakia, U. M., & Bearden, W. O. 2010. An assessment of chronic regulatory focus measures. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(5): 967–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. 2015. Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6): 831–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. 1997. Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12): 1280–1300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. 1998. Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30: 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmieleski, K. M., & Baron, R. A. 2008. Regulatory focus and new venture performance: A study of entrepreneurial opportunity exploitation under conditions of risk versus uncertainty. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2: 285–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmieleski, K. M., & Baron, R. A. 2009. Entrepreneurs’ optimism and new venture performance: A social cognitive perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3): 473–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M., Hughes, P., & Morgan, R. E. 2007. Exploitative learning and entrepreneurial orientation alignment in emerging young firms: Implications for market and response performance. British Journal of Management, 18(4): 359–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kammerlander, N., Burger, D., Fust, A., & Fueglistaller, U. 2015. Exploration and exploitation in established small and medium-sized enterprises: The effect of CEOs’ regulatory focus. Journal of Business Venturing, 30: 582–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanaj, K., Chang, C. H., & Johnson, R. E. 2012. Regulatory focus and work-related outcomes: A review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5): 998–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. 2013. Disentangling the effect of exploratory learning and exploitative learning in product innovation process. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences [Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De l’Administration], 30(2): 101–114.

  • Liberman, N., Molden, D. C., Idson, L. C., & Higgins, E. T. 2001. Promotion and prevention focus on alternative hypotheses: Implications for attributional functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1): 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. 1981. Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1981. Psychological Bulletin, 90: 125–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. 2002. Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4): 854–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. 2007. Emerging positive organizational behavior. Journal of Management, 33(3): 321–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markovits, Y. 2012. The development of regulatory foci characters and moderation effects on satisfaction and commitment. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 2(4): 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miner, J. B., & Raju, N. S. 2004. Risk propensity differences between managers and entrepreneurs and between low-and high-growth entrepreneurs: A reply in a more conservative vein. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1): 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mom, T. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. 2009. Understanding variation in managers’ ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4): 812–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H., Miyasaki, N. N., Watters, C. E., & Coombes, S. M. 2006. The dilemma of growth: Understanding venture size choices of women entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2): 221–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A., & Bergin-Seers, S. 2002. Pro-growth small businesses: Learning “architecture”. Journal of Management Development, 21(5): 388–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadkarni, S., & Herrmann, P. 2010. CEO personality, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The case of the Indian business process outsourcing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5): 1050–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neill, S., Metcalf, L. E., & York, J. 2017. Distinguishing entrepreneurial approaches to opportunity perception. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(2): 296–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neill, S., Pathak, R. D., & Reddy, N. 2009. Marketing concept manifestations in Fiji enterprises: Confirming the link to organizational competitiveness. Journal of Global Marketing, 22(1): 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neill, S., Singh, G., & Pathak, R. D. 2014. Technology and marketing capabilities in a developing economic context: Assessing the resource-based view within a boundary condition. International Journal of Business and Economics, 13(1): 75–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nes, L. S., & Segerstrom, S. C. 2006. Dispositional optimism and coping: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3): 235–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neubert, M. J., Kacmar, K. M., Carlson, D. S., Chonko, L. B., & Roberts, J. A. 2008. Regulatory focus as a mediator of the influence of initiating structure and servant leadership on employee behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6): 1220–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noel, T. W., & Latham, G. P. 2006. The importance of learning goals versus outcome goals for entrepreneurs. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 7(4): 213–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papenhausen, C. 2010. Managerial optimism and search. Journal of Business Research, 63: 716–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piao, M., & Zajac, E. J. 2016. How exploitation impedes and impels exploration: Theory and evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 37: 1431–1447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. 2009. Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4): 685–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. 1994. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the life orientation test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6): 1063–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. 2004. Mapping and interpreting cultural differences around the world. In H. Vinken, J. Soeters, & P. Ester (Eds.). Comparing cultures: Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective: 43–73. Liden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D. A., Williams, T. A., & Patzelt, H. 2015. Thinking about entrepreneurial decision making: Review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41(1): 11–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, R., Siegel, E., & Macmillan, I. C. 1993. Characteristics distinguishing high-growth ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(2): 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, G., Pathak, R. D., & Naz, R. 2010. Issues faced by SMEs in the internationalization process: Results from Fiji and Samoa. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 5(2): 153–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S., Pathak, R. D., Shee, H., Kazmi, A., & Parker, D. 2013. Interplay between entrepreneurial characteristics, organisational structure, corporate culture and SME performance: Empirical results from Fiji Islands. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 18(2): 229–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summerville, A., & Roese, N. J. 2008. Self-report measures of individual differences in regulatory focus: A cautionary note. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(1): 247–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treacy, M., & Sims, J. 2004. Take command of your growth. Harvard Business Review, 82(4): 127–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumasjan, A., & Braun, R. 2012. In the eye of the beholder: How regulatory focus and self-efficacy interact in influencing opportunity recognition. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(6): 622–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 2008. Statistics of the human development report. http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/, Accessed January 17, 2009.

  • Wallace, J. C., Butts, M. M., Johnson, P. D., Stevens, F. G., & Smith, M. B. 2016. A multilevel model of employee innovation: Understanding the effects of regulatory focus, thriving, and employee involvement climate. Journal of Management, 42(4): 982–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, J., Davidsson, P., & Delmar, F. 2003. What do they think and feel about growth? An expectancy-value approach to small business managers’ attitudes toward growth. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 27(3): 247–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, D., & Latham, G. P. 1996. The effect of learning versus outcome goals on a simple versus a complex task. Group & Organization Management, 21(2): 236–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2008. World bank group entrepreneurship survey 2008. http://go.worldbank.org/T8G73Z9ZM0, Accessed July 8, 2009.

  • World Bank. 2009. World development indicators database. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DATASTATISTICS/Resources/GDP_PPP.pdf, Accessed July 5, 2009.

  • World Bank. 2012. Pacific Islands overview. http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/pacificislands/overview, Accessed September 23, 2012.

  • Wu, C., McMullen, J. S., Neubert, M. J., & Yi, X. 2008. The influence of leader regulatory focus on employee creativity. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(5): 587–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youssef, C. M., & Luthans, F. 2007. Positive organizational behavior in the workplace the impact of hope, optimism, and resilience. Journal of Management, 33(5): 774–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orfalea College of Business, California Polytechnic State University, 1 Grand Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407, USA

    Stern Neill

  2. Graduate School of Business, Statham Campus, (Visitor, ANU, 2016-2017), University of the South Pacific, Suva, Fiji

    Raghuvar Dutt Pathak

  3. College of Business, Illinois State University, Campus Box 5580, Normal, IL, 61790-5580, USA

    Barbara A. Ribbens & Terry W. Noel

  4. School of Management & Public Administration, Faculty of Business & Economics, University of the South Pacific, Suva, Fiji

    Gurmeet Singh

Authors
  1. Stern Neill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Raghuvar Dutt Pathak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Barbara A. Ribbens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Terry W. Noel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gurmeet Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stern Neill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neill, S., Pathak, R.D., Ribbens, B.A. et al. The influence of managerial optimism and self-regulation on learning and business growth expectations within an emerging economic context. Asia Pac J Manag 37, 187–204 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9612-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9612-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation