How does an intra-family succession effect strategic change and performance in China’s family firms?

Article

Abstract

Motivated by the sparse literature on succession dynamics in China and other transitional markets we consider the effects of initiating an intra-family leadership succession on firm strategic change and performance on a sample of publicly listed family firms from China. Grounded in upper echelons theory we find that the initiation of a succession process leads to significant strategic change. Based on generational differences between founders and successors we find the succession-strategic change relationship is positively moderated by a successor’s international education. We also consider the strategic change to performance relationship.

Keywords

Family firms Strategic change Succession Foriegn education Performance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by Chinese National Natural Science Foundation, project number 71472176 and 71372200; and also funded by Renmin University of China Research Foundation, project number 2017030057. The second author also acknowledges the financial support of the Canadian Social Science and Humanities Research Council Award number 890-2014-0098.

References

  1. Au, K., Chiang, F. F., Birtch, T. A., & Ding, Z. 2013. Incubating the next generation to venture: The case of a family business in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(3): 749–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bassetti, T., Dal Maso, L., & Lattanzi, N. 2015. Family businesses in Eastern European countries: How informal payments affect exports. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6: 219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennedsen, M., Nielsen, K. M., Pérez-González, F., & Wolfenzon, D. 2007. Inside the family firm: The role of families in duccession decisions and performance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122: 647–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. 2006. The role of family in family firms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2): 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biggart, N. W., & Hamilton, G. G. 1992. On the limits of a firm-based theory to explain business networks: The Western bias of neoclassical economics. In N. Nohria, & R. G. Eccles (Eds.). Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action: 471–490. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  6. Boeker, W. 1988. Organizational origins: Entrepreneurial and environmental imprinting of the time of founding. Ecological Models of Organizations, 7: 33–51.Google Scholar
  7. Boeker, W. 1997. Executive migration and strategic change: The effect of top manager movement on productmarket entry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2): 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boisot, M., & Meyer, M. W. 2008. Which way through the open door? Reflections on the internationalization of Chinese firms. Management and Organization Review, 4(3): 349–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boling, J. R., Pieper, T. M., & Covin, J. G. 2016. CEO tenure and entrepreneurial orientation within family and nonfamily firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 40(4): 891–913.Google Scholar
  10. Cao, J., Cumming, D., & Wang, X. 2015. One-child policy and family firms in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 33: 317–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Child, J. 1997. Strategic choice in the analysis of action, structure, organizations and environment: Retrospect and prospect. Organization Studies, 18(1): 43–76.Google Scholar
  12. Chung, C. N., & Luo, X. 2008. Human agents, contexts, and institutional change: The decline of family in the leadership of business groups. Organization Science, 19(1): 124–142.Google Scholar
  13. Chung, C. N., & Luo, X. R. 2013. Leadership succession and firm performance in an emerging economy: Successor origin, relational embeddedness, and legitimacy. Strategic Management Journal, 34(3): 338–357.Google Scholar
  14. Cucculelli, M., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. 2016. Product innovation, firm renewal and family governance. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(2): 90–104.Google Scholar
  15. Cucculelli, M., & Micucci, G. 2008. Family succession and firm performance: Evidence from Italian family firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(1): 17–31.Google Scholar
  16. Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. 1992. Financial performance of founder-managed versus professionally managed small corporations. Journal of Small Business Management, 30(2): 25–34.Google Scholar
  17. Daspit, J. J., Holt, D. T., Chrisman, J. J., & Long, R. G. 2016. Examining family firm succession from a social exchange perspective: A multiphase, multistakeholder review. Family Business Review, 29(1): 44–64.Google Scholar
  18. Dou, J., & Li, S. 2013. The succession process in chinese family firms: A guanxi perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(3): 893–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eddleston, K. A., Kellermanns, F. W., Floyd, S. W., Crittenden, V. L., & Crittenden, W. F. 2013. Planning for growth: Life stage differences in family firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 37(5): 1177–1202.Google Scholar
  20. Engelen, A., Neumann, C., & Schwens, C. 2015. “Of course I can”: The effect of CEO overconfidence on entrepreneurially oriented firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 39(5): 1137–1160.Google Scholar
  21. Ermisch, J., & Gambetta, D. 2010. Do strong family ties inhibit trust? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 75(3): 365–376.Google Scholar
  22. Fainshmidt, S., Judge, W. Q., Aguilera, R. V., & Smith, A. 2016. Varieties of institutional systems: A contextual taxonomy of understudied countries. Journal of World Business.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2016.05.003.
  23. Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. 1989. Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3): 484–503.Google Scholar
  24. Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. 2009. Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. New York:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Fuller, D. B. 2016. Paper tigers, hidden dragons: Firms and the political economy of China’s technological development. Oxford:Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gedajlovic, E., Carney, M., Chrisman, J. J., & Kellermanns, F. W. 2012. The adolescence of family firm research. Journal of Management, 38(4): 1010–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gedajlovic, E., Lubatkin, M. H., & Schulze, W. S. 2004. Crossing the threshold from founder management to professional management: A governance perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 41(5): 899–912.Google Scholar
  28. Geers, A. L., & Lassiter, G. D. 2002. Effects of affective expectations on affective experience: The moderating role of optimism-pessimism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(8): 1026–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Geletkanycz, M. A., & Hambrick, D. C. 1997. The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4): 654–681.Google Scholar
  30. Girma, S., & Gorg, H. 2007. Evaluating the foreign ownership wage premium using a difference-in-difference matching approach. Journal of International Economics, 72: 97–112.Google Scholar
  31. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & De Castro, J. 2011. The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1): 653–707.Google Scholar
  32. Greenhalgh, S. 1994. De-Orientalizing the Chinese family firm. American Ethnologist, 21(4): 746–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grühn, B., Strese, S., Flatten, T. C., Jaeger, N. A., & Brettel, M. 2017. Temporal change patterns of entrepreneurial orientation: A longitudinal investigation of CEO successions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 41(4): 591–619.Google Scholar
  34. Hambrick, D. C. 2007. Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2): 334–343.Google Scholar
  35. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2): 193–206.Google Scholar
  36. Hambrick, D. C., & Quigley, T. J. 2014. Toward more accurate contextualization of the CEO effect on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4): 473–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. 1984. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2): 149–164.Google Scholar
  38. Haveman, H. A., & Khaire, M. V. 2004. Survival beyond succession? The contingent impact of founder succession on organizational failure. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3): 437–463.Google Scholar
  39. Haynes, K. T., & Hillman, A. 2010. The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 31(11): 1145–1163.Google Scholar
  40. Hayward, M. L., & Hambrick, D. C. 1997. Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1): 103–127.Google Scholar
  41. Henderson, A. D., Miller, D., & Hambrick, D. C. 2006. How quickly do CEOs become obsolete? Industry dynamism, CEO tenure, and company performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(5): 447–460.Google Scholar
  42. Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., & Lander, M. W. 2009. Structure! Agency! (and other quarrels): A meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1): 61–85.Google Scholar
  43. Hmieleski, K. M., & Baron, R. A. 2009. Entrepreneurs’ optimism and new venture performance: A social cognitive perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3): 473–488.Google Scholar
  44. Hrebiniak, L. G., & Joyce, W. F. 1985. Organizational adaptation: Strategic choice and environmental determinism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(3): 336–349.Google Scholar
  45. Hutzschenreuter, T., Kleindienst, I., & Greger, C. 2012. How new leaders affect strategic change following a succession event: A critical review of the literature. Leadership Quarterly, 23(5): 729–755.Google Scholar
  46. Ishida, H., Spilerman, S., & Su, K.-H. 1997. Educational credentials and promotion chances in Japanese and American organizations. American Sociological Review, 62(6): 866–882.Google Scholar
  47. Kosnik, R. D. 1990. Effects of board demography and directors’ incentives on corporate greenmail decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1): 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kotha, S., & Nair, A. 1995. Strategy and environment as determinants of performance: Evidence from the Japanese machine tool industry. Strategic Management Journal, 16(7): 497–518.Google Scholar
  49. Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. 2006. Why do some family businesses out-compete? Governance, long-term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30(6): 731–746.Google Scholar
  50. Le Breton-Miller, I., Miller, D., & Lester, R. H. 2011. Stewardship or agency? A social embeddedness reconciliation of conduct and performance in public family businesses. Organization Science, 22(3): 704–721.Google Scholar
  51. Le Breton-Miller, I., Miller, D., & Steier, L. P. 2004. Toward an integrative model of effective FOB succession. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 28(4): 305–328.Google Scholar
  52. Leitterstorf, M. P., & Rau, S. B. 2014. Socioemotional wealth and IPO underpricing of family firms. Strategic Management Journal, 35(5): 751–760.Google Scholar
  53. Li, J., & Tang, Y. 2010. CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1): 45–68.Google Scholar
  54. Luo, J.-h., Wan, D.-f., Cai, D., & Liu, H. 2013. Multiple large shareholder structure and governance: The role of shareholder numbers, contest for control, and formal institutions in Chinese family firms. Management and Organization Review, 9(2): 265–294.Google Scholar
  55. Luo, Y., Huang, Y., & Wang, S. L. 2012. Guanxi and organizational performance: A meta-analysis. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 139–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Miller, D. 1991. Stale in the saddle: CEO tenure and the match between organization and environment. Management Science, 37(1): 34–52.Google Scholar
  57. Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Lester, R. H. 2013. Family firm governance, strategic conformity, and performance: Institutional vs. strategic perspectives. Organization Science, 24(1): 189–209.Google Scholar
  58. Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R. H., & Cannella, Jr., A. A. 2007. Are family firms really superior performers?. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(5): 829–858.Google Scholar
  59. Minichilli, A., Corbetta, G., & MacMillan, I. C. 2010. Top management teams in family-controlled companies: ‘Familiness,’ ‘faultlines,’ and their impact on financial performance. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2): 205–222.Google Scholar
  60. Miralles-Marcelo, J. L., del Mar Miralles-Quirós, M., & Lisboa, I. 2014. The impact of family control on firm performance: Evidence from Portugal and Spain. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5: 156–168.Google Scholar
  61. Nee, V. 1992. Organizational dynamics of market transition: Hybrid forms, property rights, and mixed economy in China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1): 1–27.Google Scholar
  62. Obschonka, M., Silbereisen, R. K., Schmitt-Rodermund, E., & Stuetzer, M. 2011. Nascent entrepreneurship and the developing individual: Early entrepreneurial competence in adolescence and venture creation success during the career. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(1): 121–133.Google Scholar
  63. Peng, M. W. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 275–285.Google Scholar
  64. Pérez-González, F. 2006. Inherited control and firm performance. American Economic Review, 96(5): 1559–1588.Google Scholar
  65. Peterson, M. A. 2009. Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22(1): 435–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pi, L., & Lowe, J. 2011. Can a powerful CEO avoid involuntary replacement?—An empirical study from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(4): 775–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Quigley, T. J., & Hambrick, D. C. 2012. When the former CEO stays on as board chair: Effects on successor discretion, strategic change, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(7): 834–859.Google Scholar
  68. Ralston, D. A., Egri, C. P., Stewart, S., Terpstra, R. H., & Kaicheng, Y. 1999. Doing business in the 21st century with the new generation of Chinese managers: A study of generational shifts in work values in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(2): 415–427.Google Scholar
  69. Redding, G. 1990. The spirit of Chinese capitalism. New York:De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  70. Sardeshmukh, S. R., & Corbett, A. C. 2011. The duality of internal and external development of successors: Opportunity recognition in family firms. Family Business Review, 24(2): 111–125.Google Scholar
  71. Schulze, W. S., & Kellermanns, F. W. 2015. Reifying socioemotional wealth. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 39(3): 447–459.Google Scholar
  72. Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. 1997. Strategic management of the family business: Past research and future challenges. Family Business Review, 10(1): 1–35.Google Scholar
  73. Shen, W., & Cannella, A. A. 2002. Power dynamics within top management and their impacts on CEO dismissal followed by inside succession. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6): 1195–1206.Google Scholar
  74. Song, H., & Wang, L. 2013. The impact of private and family firms’ relational strength on financing performance in clusters. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(3): 735–748.Google Scholar
  75. Steier, L. 2001. Next-generation entrepreneurs and succession: An exploratory study of modes and means of managing social capital. Family Business Review, 14(3): 259–276.Google Scholar
  76. Steier, L. P., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. 2015. Governance challenges in family businesses and business families. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 39(6): 1265–1280.Google Scholar
  77. Su, Q., & Zhu, W. 2003. Family control and firm value: Evidence from China listed companies. Economic Research Journal, 8: 36–45.Google Scholar
  78. Tang, J., Crossan, M., & Rowe, W. 2011. Dominant CEO, deviant strategy, and extreme performance: The moderating role of a powerful board. Journal of Management Studies, 48(7): 1479–1503.Google Scholar
  79. Tang, Z., & Hull, C. 2012. An investigation of entrepreneurial orientation, perceived environmental hostility, and strategy application among Chinese SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(1): 132–158.Google Scholar
  80. Tsang, E. W. K. 2002. Learning from overseas venturing experience: The case of Chinese family businesses. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(1): 21.Google Scholar
  81. Van Essen, M., Carney, M., Gedajlovic, E. R., & Heugens, P. P. M. A. R. 2015. How does family control influence firm strategy and performance? A meta-analysis of us publicly listed firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(1): 3–24.Google Scholar
  82. Van Essen, M., Van Oosterhout, J. H., & Carney, M. 2012. Corporate boards and the performance of Asian firms: A meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(4): 873–905.Google Scholar
  83. Wang, T., Libaers, D., & Jiao, H. 2015. Opening the black box of upper echelons in China: TMT attributes and strategic flexibility. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(5): 685–703.Google Scholar
  84. Wasserman, N. 2003. Founder-CEO succession and the paradox of entrepreneurial success. Organization Science, 14(2): 149–172.Google Scholar
  85. Wasserman, N. 2006. Stewards, agents, and the founder discount: Executive compensation in new ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5): 960–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Weng, D. H., & Lin, Z. 2014. Beyond CEO tenure: The effect of CEO newness on strategic changes. Journal of Management, 40(7): 2009–2032.Google Scholar
  87. Whyte, M. K. 1996. The Chinese family and economic development: Obstacle or engine? Economic development and cultural change, 45(1): 1–30.Google Scholar
  88. Wiersema, M. F., & Bird, A. 1993. Organizational demography in Japanese firms: Group heterogeneity, individual dissimilarity, and top management team turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5): 996–1025.Google Scholar
  89. Willard, G. E., Krueger, D. A., & Feeser, H. R. 1992. In order to grow, must the founder go: A comparison of performance between founder and non-founder managed high-growth manufacturing firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(3): 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. 2008. Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal–principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1): 196–220.Google Scholar
  91. Zhang, J., & Ma, H. 2009. Adoption of professional management in Chinese family business: A multilevel analysis of impetuses and impediments. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(1): 119–139.Google Scholar
  92. Zhang, Y., & Rajagopalan, N. 2010. Once an outsider, always an outsider? CEO origin, strategic change, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3): 334–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jing Zhao
    • 1
  • Michael Carney
    • 2
  • Shubo Zhang
    • 3
  • Limin Zhu
    • 1
  1. 1.School of BusinessRenmin University of ChinaBeijingChina
  2. 2.John Molson School of BusinessConcordia UniversityWest MontréalCanada
  3. 3.School of AccountancyThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong

Personalised recommendations