Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Extending the LLL framework through an institution-based view: Acer as a dragon multinational

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mathews (Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(1): 5–27, 2006) argues for the importance of latecomer firms undertaking international expansion through the three pillars of resource linkage, leverage, and learning (LLL). We argue that these pillars can be discussed in terms of an institutional framework that explains how institutions shape resource access and economic actions. Despite their lack of capabilities vis-à-vis established multinationals, latecomers are not passive observers or recipients, but can be institutional entrepreneurs who are potentially reflexive enough to leverage their institutional linkages to acquire resources and develop learning activities for innovation, transformation, and internationalization. To illustrate our idea, we study the Taiwan-based dragon multinational, Acer, from 1976 to 2014. Three institutional blocks that underlie Acer’s engagement with institutional linkage, leverage, and learning are emphasized: the cultural system built around the norms of the Chinese family business; the political system defined by the distinct pattern of state-business relations in Taiwan; and a technological system constructed by multiple global players in the computer industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This visionary plan aspired to grow Acer’s revenues more than tenfold in ten years, from NT$8 billion (about $211 million) in 1986 to NT$40 billion in 1991 and NT$120 billion in 1996.

  2. Source: http://www.neowin.net/news/acer-founder-stan-shih-returns-to-lead-company (Last visited on October 2, 2015).

References

  • Aldrich, E. H., & Fiol, C. M. 1994. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4): 645–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aulakh, P. S. 2007. Emerging multinationals from developing economies: Motivations, paths and performance. Journal of International Management, 13(3): 235–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, T., Gedajlovic, E., & Lubatkin, M. 2005. A framework for comparing entrepreneurship processes across nations. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(5): 492–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balaguer, A., Luo, Y.-L., Tsai, M.-H., Hung, S.-C., Chu, Y.-Y., Wu, F.-S., Hsu, M.-Y., & Wang, K. 2008. The rise and growth of a policy-driven economy: Taiwan. In C. Edquist, & L. Hommen (Eds.). Small country innovation systems: Globalization, change and policy in Asia and Europe: 31–70. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. A., & George, A. 2001. Acer, Inc: Taiwan’s rampaging dragon, Case study no. 9-399-010. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. 2009. How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1): 65–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., Brannen, M. Y., & Tung, R. L. 2011. From a distance and generalizable to up close and grounded: Reclaiming a place for qualitative methods in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5): 573–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boisot, M., & Meyer, M. 2008. Which way through the open door? Reflections on the internationalization of Chinese firms. Management and Organization Review, 4(3): 349–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 1990. The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., & Lau, C. M. 2008. Asian management research: Status today and future outlook. Journal of Management Studies, 45(3): 636–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R. A. 1996. A process model of strategic business exit: Implications for an evolutionary perspective on strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S1): 193–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B., & Stankiewics, R. 1991. Of the nature, function, and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1(2): 93–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, M., Gedajlovic, E., & Yang, X. 2009. Varieties of Asian capitalism: Toward an institutional theory of Asian enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(3): 361–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R. H. 1997. Made in Taiwan: The story of acer computers. Taiwan: McGraw Hill International Enterprise.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M.-J. 2001. Inside Chinese business: A guide for managers worldwide. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M.-J. 2014. Presidential address—becoming ambicultural: A personal quest, and aspiration for organizations. Academy of Management Review, 39(2): 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., & Rodrigues, S. B. 2005. The internationalization of Chinese firms: A case for theoretical extension? Management and Organization Review, 1(3): 381–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collinson, S., & Rugman, A. M. 2007. The regional character of Asian multinational enterprises. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(4): 429–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. 1999. An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3): 522–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Genc, M. 2008. Transforming disadvantages into advantages: Developing country MNEs in the least developed countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6): 957–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dacin, M. T., Goodstein, J., & Scott, W. R. 2002. Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dedrick, J., & Kraemer, K. L. 1998. Asia’s computer challenge: Threat or opportunity for the United States and the world?. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. 2011. Qualitative research for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5): 582–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y., Santos, J., & Williamson, P. 2001. From global to metanational: How companies win in the knowledge economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. 1981. The eclectic theory of the MNC. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. 1988. The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1): 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. 2008. Institutions and the OLI paradigm of the multinational enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(4): 573–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, C., & Hommen, L. (Eds.) 2008. Small country innovation systems: Globalization, change and policy in Asia and Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. S., & Orlikowski, W. J. 2011. Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22(5): 1240–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, V. K., Fung, W. K., & Wind, Y. J. R. 2007. Competing in a flat world: Building enterprises for a borderless world. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R., Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. 2007. Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 28(7): 957–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaur, A. S., Kumar, V., & Sarathy, R. 2011. Liability of foreignness and internationalisation of emerging market firms. Advances in International Management, 24: 211–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. 1973. The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. 2005. The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1): 78–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbon, P. 2001. Upgrading primary production: A global commodity chain approach. World Development, 29(2): 345–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Hinings, C. R., & Suddaby, R. 2002. Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 58–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. 2008. Institutional entrepreneurship. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.). The handbook of organizational institutionalism: 198–217. London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. 2010. Discourse, field-configuring events, and change in organizations and institutional fields: Narratives of DDT and the Stockholm convention. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6): 1365–1392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E. 2007. Stylized facts, empirical research and theory development in management. Strategic Organization, 5(2): 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., Zardkoohi, A., & Bierman, L. 1999. Corporate political strategies and firm performance: Indications of firm-specific benefits from personal service in the U.S. government. Strategic Management Journal, 20(1): 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P., Thompson, G., & Bromley, S. 2015. Globalization in question: The international economy and the possibilities of governance, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. 2007. Asian management in the twenty-first century. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(4): 411–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R. E., Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., & Peng, M. W. 2013. Emerging multinationals from mid-range economies: The influence of institutions and factor markets. Journal of Management Studies, 50(7): 1295–1321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, S.-C., & Whittington, R. 2011. Agency in national innovation systems: Institutional entrepreneurship and the professionalization of Taiwanese IT. Research Policy, 40(4): 526–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jick, T. D. 1979. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4): 602–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, L. 1997. Imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea’s technological learning. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, M. T. 2008. Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 33(4): 994–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraatz, M., & Block, E. S. 2008. Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.). The handbook of organizational institutionalism: 243–275. London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A. 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4): 691–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, T., McGuire, S., & Rajwani, T. 2013. Corporate political activity: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1): 86–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarini, S. G. 2015. Strategizing by the government: Can industrial policy create firm-level competitive advantage?. Strategic Management Journal, 36(1): 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.-K., & Hung, S.-C. 2014. Institutional entrepreneurship in the informal economy: China’s Shan-zhai mobile phones. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(1): 16–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. H., Peng, M. W., & Barney, J. B. 2007. Bankruptcy law and entrepreneurship development: A real options perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(1): 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, P. P. 2010. Toward a learning-based view of internationalization: The accelerated trajectories of cross-border learning for latecomers. Journal of International Management, 16(1): 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H. C., & Hou, S. T. 2010. Managerial lessons from the east: An interview with Acer’s Stan Shih. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(4): 6–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. 1992. National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Wang, S. L. 2012. Foreign direct investment strategies by developing country multinationals: A diagnostic model for home country effects. Global Strategy Journal, 2(3): 244–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lux, S., Crook, T. R., & Woehr, D. J. 2011. Mixing business with politics: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and outcomes of corporate political activity. Journal of Management, 37(1): 223–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. 2004. Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5): 657–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. A. 2002. Dragon multinational: A new model for global growth. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. A. 2006. Dragon multinationals: New players in twenty-first century globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(1): 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. 1968. Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E. 2007. Asian contexts and the search for general theory in management research: A rejoinder. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(4): 527–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Probing theoretically into central and Eastern Europe: Transactions, resources, and institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(6): 600–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E., & Thaijongrak, O. 2013. The dynamics of emerging economy MNEs: How the internationalization process model can guide future research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(4): 1125–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. 1997. Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9): 697–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. 2002. Towards an institution-based view of business strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2–3): 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 275–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y., & Jiang, Y. 2008. An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5): 920–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M. 1990. Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 1(3): 267–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinder, C. C., & Moore, L. F. 1979. The resurrection of taxonomy to aid the development of middle range theories of organizational behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(1): 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. L., & Lieberthal, K. 1998. The end of corporate imperialism. Harvard Business Review, 76: 68–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. 2007. The new argonauts: Regional advantage in a global economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih, S. 1989. The challenge for creating business. Taipei: University of Society in Chinese.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih, S. 1996. Me-too is not my style: Challenge difficulties, break through bottlenecks, create values. Taipei: The Acer Foundation in Chinese.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sine, W. D., Haveman, H. A., & Tolbert, P. S. 2005. Risky business? Entrepreneurship in the new independent-power sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2): 200–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, J. W. 2003. Global gatekeeping, representation, and network structure: A longitudinal analysis of regional knowledge-diffusion networks. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(5): 428–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, J. W., Murtha, T. P., & Lenway, S. A. 2005. How governments matter to new industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 30(2): 321–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng, C. H., Beamish, P. W., & Chen, S. F. 2011. Institutions and entrepreneurship development: High-technology indigenous firms in China and Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(3): 453–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaara, E., & Whittington, R. 2012. Strategy-as-practice: Taking social practices seriously. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1): 285–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. 2011. The modern world-system I: Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the sixteenth century, with a new prologue, Vol. 1. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. 1989. Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 516–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D. A. 2009. An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 29–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. D. 1992. Business systems in East Asia. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, M. A., & Redding, G. 2013. Asian business systems: Institutional comparison, clusters and implications for varieties of capitalism and business systems theory. Socio-Economic Review, 11(2): 265–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamakawa, Y., Peng, M. W., & Deeds, D. L. 2008. What drives new ventures to internationalize from emerging to developed economies? Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 32(1): 59–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, H. W. C. 2006. Change and continuity in Southeast Asian ethnic Chinese business. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(3): 229–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yiu, D. W. 2011. Multinational advantages of Chinese business groups: A theoretical exploration. Management and Organization Review, 7(2): 249–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Technology Management, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China

    Shih-Chang Hung

  2. College of Management, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China

    Yung-Ching Tseng

Authors
  1. Shih-Chang Hung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yung-Ching Tseng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shih-Chang Hung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hung, SC., Tseng, YC. Extending the LLL framework through an institution-based view: Acer as a dragon multinational. Asia Pac J Manag 34, 799–821 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-016-9494-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-016-9494-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation