Advertisement

Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 533–549 | Cite as

Business model innovation: The effects of exploratory orientation, opportunity recognition, and entrepreneurial bricolage in an emerging economy

  • Hai Guo
  • Zhongfeng SuEmail author
  • David Ahlstrom
Article

Abstract

Business model innovation takes shape through a process of experimentation. This study holds that exploratory orientation is a key initiating factor of the experimentation process, and opportunity recognition and entrepreneurial bricolage both are actions constituting this process and thereby serve as conduits between exploratory orientation and business model innovation. Based on a survey data of Chinese firms, this study finds the positive relationship between exploratory orientation and business model innovation is mediated by opportunity recognition and entrepreneurial bricolage. The findings not only enrich the discipline’s knowledge on the antecedents of business model innovation but also extend the implications of exploratory orientation, opportunity recognition, and entrepreneurial bricolage to business model innovation.

Keywords

Exploratory orientation Opportunity recognition Entrepreneurial bricolage Business model innovation China 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71202107, 71472087, and 71472185). The authors would also like to thank Marc Ahlstrom of Rowan College at Burlington County for his editorial assistance.

References

  1. Ahlstrom, D. 2010. Innovation and growth: How business contributes to society. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3): 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. 2010. International management: Strategy and culture in the emerging world. Mason: Cengage.Google Scholar
  3. Ahlstrom, D., & Ding, Z. 2014. Entrepreneurship in China: An overview. International Small Business Journal, 32: 610–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Amit, R., & Zott, C. 2001. Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 493–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amit, R., & Zott, C. 2012. Creating value through business model innovation. Sloan Management Review, 53: 41–49.Google Scholar
  7. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. 1977. Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14: 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Atuahene-Gima, K. 2005. Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69: 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. 2005. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 329–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bauer, M., & Leker, J. 2013. Exploration and exploitation in product and process innovation in the chemical industry. R&D Management, 43: 196–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brettel, M., Strese, S., & Flatten, T. 2012. Improving the performance of business models with relationship marketing efforts: An entrepreneurial perspective. European Management Journal, 30: 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Zhu, F. 2013. Business model innovation and competitive imitation: The case of sponsor-based business models. Strategic Management Journal, 34: 464–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chesbrough, H. 2010. Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43: 354–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. 2003. The innovators solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  16. Demil, B., & Lecocq, X. 2010. Business model evolution: In search of dynamic consistency. Long Range Planning, 43: 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunbar, R. L. M., & Ahlstrom, D. 1995. Seeking the institutional balance of power: Avoiding the power of a balanced view. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 171–192.Google Scholar
  18. Eckhardt, J., & Shane, S. 2003. Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29: 333–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18: 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garud, R., & Karnoe, P. 2003. Bricolage vs. breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32: 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. George, G., & Bock, A. 2011. The business model in practice and its implications for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35: 83–111.Google Scholar
  22. Giesen, E., Berman, S. J., Bell, R., & Blitz, A. 2007. Three ways to successfully innovate your business model. Strategy and Leadership, 35: 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. 2006. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 693–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamel, G. 2012. What matters now: How to win in a world of relentless change, ferocious competition, and unstoppable innovation hardcover. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  25. Hansen, D. J., Shrader, R., & Monllor, J. 2011. Defragmenting definitions of entrepreneurial opportunity. Journal of Small Business Management, 49: 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hatcher, L. 1994. A step-by-step approach to using the SAS(R) system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  27. Hayashi, A. M. 2009. Do you have a plan “B”?. Sloan Management Review, 51: 10–11.Google Scholar
  28. He, Z., & Wong, P. 2004. Exploration and exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15: 481–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. IBM Global Business Services. 2006. Expanding the innovation horizon: The global CEO study 2006. www-07.ibm.com/sg/pdf/global_ceo_study.pdf, Accessed June 1, 2015.
  30. Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., & Kagerman, H. 2008. Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review, 86(12): 50–59.Google Scholar
  31. Ketchen, D. J., Hult, T. G. M., & Slater, S. F. 2007. Toward greater understanding of market orientation and the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 961–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee, Y., Shin, J., & Park, Y. 2012. The changing pattern of SME’s innovativeness through business model globalisation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(5): 832–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lévi-Strauss, C. 1967. The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2: 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McGrath, R. G. 2010. Business models: A discovery driven approach. Long Range Planning, 43: 247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nair, A., Ahlstrom, D., & Filer, L. 2007. Localized advantage in a global economy: The case of Bangalore. Thunderbird International Business Review, 49(5): 591–618.Google Scholar
  37. Neter, J., William, W., & Kutner, M. H. 1985. Applied linear statistical models: Regression, analysis of variance, and experimental design. Homewood: Richard Irwin.Google Scholar
  38. Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric theory, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  39. Ozgen, E., & Baron, R. 2007. Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: Effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums. Journal of Business Venturing, 22: 174–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sambasivan, M., Abdul, M., & Yusop, Y. 2009. Impact of personal qualities and management skills of entrepreneurs on venture performance in Malaysia: Opportunity recognition skills as a mediating factor. Technovation, 29(11): 798–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sarasvathy, S. D. 2008. Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sobel, M. E. 1982. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.). Sociological methodology: 290–312. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  44. Sosna, M., Trevinyo-Rodríguez, R. N., & Velamuri, S. R. 2010. Business models innovation through trial-and-error learning: The Naturhouse case. Long Range Planning, 43: 383–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Teece, D. J. 2010. Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43: 172–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wu, W. 2008. Dimensions of social capital and firm competitiveness improvement: The mediating role of information sharing. Journal of Management Studies, 45: 122–146.Google Scholar
  47. Young, M. N., Tsai, T., Wang, X., Liu, S., & Ahlstrom, D. 2014. Strategy in emerging economies and the theory of the firm. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(2): 331–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zott, C., & Amit, R. 2007. Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 18: 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zott, C., & Amit, R. 2008. The fit between product market strategy and business model: Implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zott, C., & Amit, R. 2010. Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 49: 216–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. 2011. The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37: 1019–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessRenmin University of ChinaBeijingChina
  2. 2.Nanjing University Business SchoolNanjingChina
  3. 3.Department of Management CUHK Business SchoolThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong

Personalised recommendations