Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 1105–1129 | Cite as

Work status, gender, and organizational commitment among Korean workers: The mediating role of person-organization fit

Article

Abstract

The aim of this article is to examine the role of person-organization (P-O) fit in the relationship between work status and organizational commitment. To this end, this article looks at whether women and workers on part-time or short-term contracts show a lower degree of commitment to the organization than their counterparts in Korea, before and after controlling for P-O fit. The results show that P-O fit mediates work status and organizational commitment. In addition, gender moderates the relationship between work status and organizational commitment. Among men, regular workers are more committed, while there is no difference detected among women so far as regular and non-regular workers are concerned. The authors also argue that since workers without secure employment do not constitute a homogenous group, a variety of methods should be employed to manage them. This article suggests that, given the lowering of organizational commitment after the economic crisis of the late 1990s in Korea, loyalty to one’s organization can be raised by enhancing the P-O fit.

Keywords

Organizational commitment Person-organization fit Regular and non-regular workers Gender Korea 

References

  1. Abegglen, J. 2006. 21st-century Japanese management: New systems, lasting values. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  2. Argyris, C. 1960. Understanding organizational behavior. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
  3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartol, K. M. 1999. Gender influences on performance evaluation. In G. N. Powell (Ed.). Handbook of gender and work: 165–178. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentler, P. M., & Bonnett, D. G. 1980. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88: 588–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blau, P. M. 1964. Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiely.Google Scholar
  7. Buch, R., Kuvaas, B., & Dysvik, A. 2010. Dual support in contract workers’ triangle employment relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77: 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buonocore, F. 2010. Contingent work in the hospitality industry: A mediating model of organizational attitudes. Tourism Management, 31(3): 378–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Byrne, D. 1971. The attraction paradigm. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  10. Chambel, M. J., & Castanheira, F. 2006. Different temporary work status, different behaviors in organization. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20(3): 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chambel, M. J., & Castanheira, F. 2007. They don’t want to temporaries: Similarities between temps and core workers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28: 943–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chang, H., Han, S., Lee, J., Jung, Y., Hong, D., Seo, U., & Yi, G. 2006. Koreans’ occupational consciousness and work ethics. Seoul: KRIVET.Google Scholar
  13. Chattopadhyay, P., & George, E. 2001. Examining the effects of work externalization though the lens of social identity theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4): 781–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Connelly, R., & Kimmel, J. 2003. Marital status and full-time/part-time work status in child care choices. Applied Economics, 35(7): 761–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Conway, N., & Briner, R. 2002. Full-time versus part-time employees: Understanding the links between work status, the psychological contract, and attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61: 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. 2005. Understanding psychological contracts at work: A critical evaluation of theory and research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davis-Blake, A., Broschak, J., & George, E. 2003. Happy together? How using non-standard workers affects exit, voice, and loyalty among standard workers. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 475–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dick, P. 2006. The psychological contract and the transition from full to part-time police work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27: 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dulac, T., Coyle-Shapiro, J. A.-M., Henderson, D. J., & Wayne, S. J. 2008. Not all responses to breach are the same: The interconnection of social exchange and psychological contract processes in organization. Academy of Management Journal, 51(6): 1079–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Economic and Social Development Commission. 2009. Discussions regarding non-regular workers in Korea. http://www.lmg.go.kr/bbs/viewbody.asp?code=committee_report&id=190&number=190, Accessed Jul. 17, 2009.
  21. Ellingson, J. E., Gruys, M. L., & Sackett, P. R. 1998. Factors related to the satisfaction and performance of temporary employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6): 913–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Emslie, C., & Hunt, K. 2009. ‘Live to work’ or ‘work to live’? A qualitative study of gender and work-life balance among men and women in mid-life. Gender, Work and Organization, 16(1): 151–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Endler, N. S., & Magnusson, D. 1976. Interactional psychology and personality. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Feldman, D. C. 1995. Managing part-time and temporary employment relationships: Individual needs and organizational demands. In M. London (Ed.). Employees, careers, and job creation: 121–141. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  25. Feldman, D. C., Doerpinghaus, H. I., & Turnley, W. H. 1995. Employee reactions to temporary jobs. Journal of Management Issues, 7: 127-141.Google Scholar
  26. Gefen, D., & Ridings, C. M. 2002. Implementation team responsiveness and user evaluation of customer relationship management: A quasi-experimental design study of social exchange theory. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1): 47–69.Google Scholar
  27. Gouldner, A. W. 1960. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2): 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Greguras, G. J., & Diefendorff, J. M. 2009. Different fits satisfy different needs: Linking person-environment fit to employee commitment and performance using self-determination theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 465–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guest, D. E. 2004. The psychology of the employment relationship: An analysis based on the psychological contract. Applied Psychology: An international Review, 53(4): 541–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Guest, D. E., Oakely, P., Clinton, M., & Budjanovcanin, A. 2006. Free or precarious? A comparison of the attitudes of workers in flexible and traditional employment contracts. Human Resource Management Review, 16(2): 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hakim, C. 2000. Work-lifestyle choices in the 21st century: Preference theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hakim, C. 2002. Lifestyle preferences as determinants of women’s differentiated labor market careers. Work and Occupations, 29(4): 428–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. 1993. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International Inc.Google Scholar
  34. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. 1996. LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International Inc.Google Scholar
  35. Kalleberg, A. L., Rasell, E., Hudson, K., Webster, D., Reskin, B. F., Cassirer, N., & Appelbaum, E. 1997. Nonstandard work, substandard jobs: Flexible work arrangements in the US. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  36. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. 1978. The social psychology of organizations, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  37. Korea JoongAng Daily. 2009. First non-regular workers laid off in bill stalemate. http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2906861, Accessed Jul. 2, 2009.
  38. Korea Labour & Society Institute. 2010. Size and situation of non-regular workers in 2010. http://www.klsi.org, Labour Society Bulletin, Accessed Jul–Aug, 2010.
  39. Korea National Statistical Office (KNSO). 2010. Supplementary results of the economically active population survey by employment type in March. http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_ko/5/2/index.board?bmode=read&aSeq=71194, Accessed Jun. 4, 2010.
  40. Krahn, H. 1992. Quality of work in the service sector. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Housing, Family, and Social Statistics Division.Google Scholar
  41. Kristof, A. L. 1996. Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1): 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. 2005. Consequences of individual’s fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2): 281–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. 2001. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1): 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Loscocco, K. A. 1997. Work-family linkages among self-employed women and men. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50(2): 204–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lovelace, K., & Rosen, B. 1996. Differences in achieving person-organization fit among diverse groups of managers. Journal of Management, 22(5): 703–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Marsden, P. V., Kalleberg, A. L., & Cook, C. R. 1993. Gender differences in organizational commitment: Influences of work positions and family roles. Work and Occupations, 20(3): 368–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., & Ruokolainen, M. 2006. Exploring work-and organization-based resources as moderators between work-family conflict, well-being, and job attitudes. Work and Stress, 20(3): 210–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McDonald, D. J., & Makin, P. J. 2000. The psychological contract, organizational commitment and job satisfaction of temporary staff. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 21: 84–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mitchell, T. R. 1985. An evaluation of the validity of correlational research conducted in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 10(2): 192–205.Google Scholar
  50. Monk-Turner, E., & Turner, C. G. 2001. Sex differentials in earnings in the South Korean labor market. Feminist Economics, 7(1): 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. 1997. When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22: 226–256.Google Scholar
  52. Muchinsky, P. M., & Monahan, C. J. 1987. What is person-environment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary models of fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31(3): 268–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Myrdal, A., & Klein, V. 1956. Women’s two roles: Home and work. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.Google Scholar
  54. Pearce, J. L. 1993. Toward an organizational behavior of contract laborers: Their psychological involvement and effects on employee co-workers. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5): 1082–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Platow, M. M., Wenzel, M., & Nolan, M. 2003. The importance of social identity and self-categorization processes for creating and responding to fairness. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow & N. Ellemers (Eds.). Social identity at work: 261–276. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  56. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5): 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Powell, G. N., & Greenhaus, J. H. 2010. Sex, gender, and the work-to-family interface: Exploring negative and positive interdependencies. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3): 513–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rousseau, D. 1995. Psychological contracts in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Rousseau, D. 1998. The “problem” of the psychological contract considered. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19: 665–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. 1998. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Saks, A. M., & Ashforth, B. E. 1997. A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between job information sources, applicant perceptions of fit, and work outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 50: 395–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stamper, C. L., & Van Dyne, L. 2001. Work status and organizational citizenship behavior: A field study of restaurant employees. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22: 517–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Steffy, B. D., & Jones, J. W. 1990. Differences between full-time and part-time employees in perceived role strain and work satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11: 321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stoner, J. S., & Gallagher, V. C. 2010. Who cares? The role of job involvement in psychological contract violation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(6): 1490–1514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Syed, J., & Pio, E. 2010. Veiled diversity? Workplace experiences of Muslim women in Australia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(1): 115–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tam, M. Y.-M., & Chiu, S. 2010. Job training provision by employers-an institutional analysis of employees in Hong Kong. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(12): 2104–2217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Thorsteinson, T. J. 2003. Job attitudes of part-time vs. full-time workers: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76: 151–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tomlinson, J. 2007. Employment regulation, welfare and gender regimes: A comparative analysis of women’s working-time patterns and work-life balance in the UK and the US. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(3): 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tuten, T. L., & August, R. A. 2004. Korea’s search for gender equality and women’s career growth. Advances in Competitiveness Research, 12(1): 37–43.Google Scholar
  70. Verquer, M. L., Beehr, T. A., & Wagner, S. H. 2003. A meta-analysis of relations between person-organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63: 473–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Walsh, J. 1999. Myths and counter-myths: An analysis of part-time female employees and their orientations to work and working hours. Work, Employment and Society, 13(2): 179–203.Google Scholar
  72. Warren, T. 2004. Working part-time: Achieving a successful ‘work-life’ balance. British Journal of Sociology, 55(1): 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Warren, T., & Walters, P. 1998. Appraising a dichotomy: A review of ‘part-time/full-time’ in the study of women’s employment in Britain. Gender, Work and Organization, 5(2): 102–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wegge, J., Van Dick, R., Fisher, G. K., Wecking, C., & Moltzen, K. 2006. Work motivation, organizational identification, and well-being in call centre work. Work and Stress, 20: 60–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. White, J. 1983. Women and part-time work. Ottawa: Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  76. Wownet. 2009. Last year, small and medium-sized firms, turnover rate 12%. http://www.wownet.co.kr/news/wownews/view_nhn.asp?bcode=N07010000&artid=A200906150071, Accessed Jun. 15, 2009.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jee Young Seong
    • 1
  • Doo-Seung Hong
    • 2
  • Won-Woo Park
    • 3
  1. 1.Henry B. Tippie College of BusinessUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologySeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea
  3. 3.College of Business AdministrationSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations