Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of perceptions on LMX and work performance: Effects of supervisors’ perception of subordinates’ emotional intelligence and subordinates’ perception of trust in the supervisor on LMX and, consequently, performance

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are few studies on how the perception of supervisors by their subordinates contributes to high-quality leader-member exchange (LMX). We thus propose that the trust perception of supervisors by their subordinates can help explain the development of high-quality LMX. Furthermore, the trust perception may interact with supervisor-rated emotional intelligence to influence the quality of LMX, and, consequently, work performance. Using a longitudinal study on a sample of 285 supervisor-subordinate dyads from a manufacturing firm in China, we found that (1) supervisor-rated emotional intelligence of subordinates (Time 1) positively predicts the quality of LMX (Time 2); (2) this relationship is stronger when subordinates highly trust their supervisors (Time 1); (3) LMX (Time 2) positively predicts work performance (Time 3); and (4) LMX (Time 2) fully mediates the interactive effect of emotional intelligence (Time 1) and trust in the supervisor (Time 1) on work performance (Time 3).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandalos, D. L. 2002. The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9: 78–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. 1964. Exchange and power in social Life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R., Lonner, W. J., & Thorndike, R. 1973. Cross-cultural research methods. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, C. S., Sims, D. E., Lazzara, E. H., & Salas, E. 2007. Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration. Leadership Quarterly, 18: 606–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. 2006. Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44: 473–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., Lam, W., & Zhong, J. A. 2007. Leader-member exchange and member performance: A new look at individual-level negative feedback-seeking behavior and team-level empowerment climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 202–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Tan, H. 2000. Trusted unit manager and business unit performance: Empirical evidence of a competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 563–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, D. V., & Crain, E. C. 1992. The role of affect and ability in initial exchange quality perceptions. Group and Organization Management, 17: 380–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W., Giebels, E., & Van de Vliert, E. 1998. Social motives and trust in integrative negotiation: The disruptive effects of punitive capability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 408–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deluga, R. J., & Perry, J. T. 1994. The role of subordinate performance and ingratiation in leader-member exchanges. Group and Organization Management, 19: 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. 1986. Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11: 618–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K. T. 1999. The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84: 445–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. 2001. The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12: 450–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dockery, T. M., & Steiner, D. D. 1990. The role of the initial interaction in leader-member exchange. Group and Organization Studies, 15: 395–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doney, P. M., Cannon, J. P., & Mullen, M. R. 1998. Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23: 601–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, S. J. 1997. Learning the plot: Emotional momentum in search of dramatic logic. Management Learning, 28: 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dulewicz, V., & Higgs, M. 2000. Emotional intelligence: A review and evaluation study. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15: 341–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, N. G., Hanges, P. J., & Hall, R. J. 2005. Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16: 149–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earley, P. C. 1986. Trust, perceived importance of praise and criticism, and work performance: An examination of feedback in the United States and England. Journal of Management, 12: 457–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, D. E. 2004. The psychological assessment of emotional intelligence. In J. C. Thomas & M. Hersen (Eds.). Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment: 203–215. New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. 1997. Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 827–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. 1996. Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ?. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. 1998. Working with emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.

  • Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. 1995. Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 Years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6: 219–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graen, G. B., Wakabayashi, M., Graen, M. R., & Graen, M. G. 1990. International generalizability of American hypothesis about Japanese management progress: A strong inference investigation. Leadership Quarterly, 1: 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. T., Blass, F. R., Ferris, G. R., & Massengale, R. 2004. Leader reputation and accountability in organizations: Implications for dysfunctional leader behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 15: 515–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, P. S., Zhang, Z.-X., & Han, Y. 2010. Team empowerment and the organizational context: Decentralization and the contrasting effects of formalization. Journal of Management. doi:10.1177/0149206309345020

  • Henderson, C., Dakof, G., Schwartz, S., & Liddle, H. 2006. Family functioning, self-concept, and severity of adolescent externalizing problems. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 15: 719–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hox, J. J. 2002. Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Kacmar, K. M., Witt, L. A., Zivnuska, S., & Gully, S. M. 2003. The interactive effect of leader-member exchange and communication frequency on performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 764–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, A. G., & Muthén, B. O. 2007. Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation of structural equation models with multiple interaction and quadratic effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42: 647–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, M. W. 2006. Communication strategies for sharing leadership within a creative team: LMX in theater groups. In G. B. Graen & J. A. Graen (Eds.). Sharing network leadership: 1–24. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing Inc.

  • Kramer, R. 1999. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50: 569–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, W., Huang, X., & Snape, E. 2007. Feedback-seeking behavior and leader-member exchange: Do supervisor-attributed motives matter?. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 348–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, K. S., Wong, C.-S., & Song, L. J. 2004. The construct and criterion validity of emotional intelligence and its potential utility for management studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89: 483–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, K. S., Wong, C.-S., Huang, G.-H., & Li, X. 2008. The effects of emotional intelligence on job performance and life satisfaction for the research and development scientists in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(1): 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. 1996. Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.). Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research: 114–139. London: Sage Publications.

  • Liden, R. C., Sparrowe, R. T., & Wayne, S. J. 1997. Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. Research in personnel and human resources management, 15: 47–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D. 1993. A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 662–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. 2002. To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9: 151–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z. L., & Hau, K. T. 2004. Structural equation models of latent interactions: Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological Methods, 9: 275–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslyn, J. M., & Uhl-Bien, M. 2001. Leader-member exchange and its dimensions: Effects of self-effort and other’s effort on relationship quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 697–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20: 709–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. 2008. Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. 1990. Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1: 107–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, G. 1997. The scales manager as a role model: Effects on trust, job satisfaction and performance of salespeople. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25.

  • Robinson, S. L., Dirks, K. T., & Ozcelik, H. 2004. Untangling the knot of trust and betrayal. In R. M. Kramer & K. E. Cook (Eds.). Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches: 327–341. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L., & Rousseau, D. M. 1994. Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15: 245–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., Stikin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. 1998. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23: 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacco, J. M., Scheu, C. R., Ryan, A. M., & Schmitt, N. 2003. An investigation of race and sex similarity effects in interviews: A multilevel approach to relational demography. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 852–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. 1990. Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9: 185–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. L. 2006. Emotional intelligence, leader-member exchange, and individual contributions to organizational social capital. In G. B. Graen & J. A. Graen (Eds.). Sharing network leadership: 169–190. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing Inc.

  • Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. 1991. Relations of job characteristics from multiple data sources with employee affect, absence, turnover intentions, and health. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. 1920. A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4: 25–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Degoey, P. 1996. Trust in organizational authorities: The influence of motive attributions on willingness to accept decisions. In Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M., & Maslyn, J. 2003. Reciprocity in manager-subordinate relationships: Components, configurations, and outcomes. Journal of Management, 29: 511–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. 1996. Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81: 525–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakabayashi, M., Chen, Z., & Graen, G. B. 2005. The global Asian way: Managerial efficacy profile (MEP) and LMX relationship in Asia. In G. B. Graen (Ed.). LMX leadership: The series: New frontiers of leadership: 121–137. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Law, K. S., Hackett, R. D., Wang, D., & Chen, Z. X. 2005. Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 420–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. 2002. Which managers trust employees? Ownership variation in China’s transnational economy. Asia Pacific Business Review, 9: 138–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C.-S., & Law, K. S. 2002. The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: An exploratory study. The Leadership Quarterly, 13: 243–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C.-S., Wong, P. M., & Law, K. 2007. Evidence of the practical utility of Wong’s emotional intelligence scale in Hong Kong and mainland China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(1): 43–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. 2006. Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian An Zhong.

Additional information

This paper was supported by grants from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (GRF No. CityU 1432/05H and CityU141007), the Newly Recruited Junior Academic Staff Research Funds (No. A-PC1G) from the Hong Kong Polytechnic University, and the programming project of the philosophy and social science in Zhejiang Province, China (No. 09CGGL00YB).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, Z., Lam, W. & Zhong, J.A. Effects of perceptions on LMX and work performance: Effects of supervisors’ perception of subordinates’ emotional intelligence and subordinates’ perception of trust in the supervisor on LMX and, consequently, performance. Asia Pac J Manag 29, 597–616 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-010-9210-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-010-9210-z

Keywords

Navigation