Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 163–183 | Cite as

Economic and strategic considerations surrounding Chinese FDI in the United States



The growth of outward investment from China has generated expressions of concern from policymakers in the United States regarding the economic and national security impacts of such investments. While inward foreign direct investment (FDI) has come to be viewed by most observers as generally imparting net economic benefits to the host economy, acquisitions of US companies by Chinese multinational companies (MNCs) have been criticized on several grounds. One is based on the mode of entry itself: some critics believe that entry by acquisition brings lower benefits than greenfield entry. A second and more prominent concern is that acquisitions of US companies by Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) may be motivated by non-commercial objectives which, in turn, make those acquisitions of questionable value to the host economy. In this paper, we argue that Chinese FDI in the United States is more likely to take the form of acquisitions than greenfield investments for the foreseeable future. However, there is no strong case to be made that the host country economic benefits from Chinese FDI would be larger if entry took place primarily through greenfield investments. Furthermore, most of the alleged costs to the US economy from inward FDI from China are either unlikely to occur or are already anticipated by existing US laws and regulations, thus necessitating no additional, specific legislation.


Chinese foreign direct investment Acquisition Greenfield Multinational companies State-owned enterprises 


  1. Antkiewicz, A., & Whalley, J. 2007. Recent Chinese buyout activity and the implications for wider global investment rules. Canadian Public Policy, 23(2): 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barkley, T. 2008. Code is set for state-run funds. The Wall Street Journal, March 21: A4.Google Scholar
  3. Bertrand, O., Hakkala, K., & Norback, P. 2007. Cross-border acquisition or greenfield entry: Does it matter for affiliate R&D? Working paper no. 693, Stockholm: Research Institute of Industrial Economics.Google Scholar
  4. Blomstrom, M., Kokko, A., & Zejan, M. 2000. Foreign direct investment: Firm and host country strategies. New York: St. Martin’s Press Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Bloningen, B., & Slaughter, M. 2001. Foreign affiliate activity and U.S. skill upgrading. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(2): 362–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brouthers, K., & Brouthers, L. 2000. Acquisition or greenfield start-up? International cultural and transaction cost influences. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1): 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cattaneo, C. 2007. Abu Dhabi national targets Canadian oil and gas growth. National Post, August 17: 5.Google Scholar
  8. Cheng, L. K. & Ma, Z. 2008. China’s outward FDI: Past and future. In press.Google Scholar
  9. Chung, W. 2001. Mode, size and location of foreign direct investments and industry markup. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization, 45: 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Claeys, S., & Hainz, C. 2006. Acquisition versus greenfield: The impact of the mode of foreign bank entry on information and bank lending rates. Working paper no. 653, Germany: The European Central Bank.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, B. 2007. How trade talks could tame sovereign wealth funds. The Wall Street Journal, October 29: A2.Google Scholar
  12. Fagan, D. 2007. Is the U.S. ready for FDI (and especially M&As) from China? The U.S. regulatory and institutional framework for FDI with special attention to FDI from China.Google Scholar
  13. Ferrett, B. 2005. Greenfield investment versus acquisition: Alternative modes of foreign expansion. Research paper no. 39, The University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
  14. Goergen, M. 2007 What do we know about different systems of corporate governance? Finance working paper no. 163, European Corporate Governance Institute.Google Scholar
  15. Hemerling, J., Michaels, D., & Michaelis, H. 2006. China’s global challengers: The strategic implications of Chinese outbound M&A. Cambridge: The Boston Consulting Group.Google Scholar
  16. Heyman, F., Sjoholm, F., & Gustafson, P. 2004. Is there really a foreign ownership wage premium? Evidence from matched employer–employee data. Stockholm: European Institute of Japanese Studies.Google Scholar
  17. Hong, E., & Sun, L. 2004. Go overseas via direct investment: Internationalization strategy of Chinese corporations in a comparative prism. Centre for Financial and Management Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
  18. Huttenen, K. 2007. The effects of foreign acquisitions on employment and wages: Evidence from Finnish establishments. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(3): 497–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kang, C. S. 1997. U.S. politics and greater regulation of inward foreign direct investment. International organization, 51(2): 301–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li, P. P. 2007. Toward an integrated theory of multinational evolution: The evidence of Chinese multinational enterprises as latecomers. Journal of International Management, 13(93): 296–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mata, J., & Portugal, P. 2000. Closure and divestiture by foreign entrants: The impact of entry and post-entry strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5): 549–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mathieu, E. 2006. Investments from large developing economies in France and Europe. Paris: Invest in France Agency.Google Scholar
  23. McCloughan, P., & Stone, I. 1998. Life duration of foreign multinational subsidiaries: Evidence from UK northern manufacturing industry 1970–93. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 16(6): 719–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McMahon, D. 2007. Big interest in China small caps. The Wall Street Journal, October 22: C6.Google Scholar
  25. Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S., & Peng, M. W. 2008. Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal (in press).Google Scholar
  26. Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Zhao, M. 2008. Perspectives on China’s outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(3): 337–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2007. Trends and recent developments in foreign direct investment. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  28. Peng, M. W. 2004. Outside directors and firm performance during institutional transitions. Strategic Management Journal, 25(5): 453–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Prakash, P., & Alakshendra, A. 2006. Overseas acquisition versus greenfield foreign investment: Which internationalization strategy is better for Indian pharmaceutical enterprises? New Delhi: Institute for Studies in Industrial Development.Google Scholar
  30. Rowan, J. 2008. Statement before the subcommittee on crime, terrorism and homeland security committee on the judiciary House of Representatives concerning enforcement of federal espionage laws, January 29.Google Scholar
  31. Scannell, K. 2007. Cox cites concerns over sovereign funds. The Wall Street Journal, October 26: A8.Google Scholar
  32. Slangen, A., & Hennart, J. 2007. Greenfield or acquisition entry: A review of the empirical foreign establishment mode literature. Journal of International Management, 13(4): 403–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. The World Bank, 2006. Held by the visible hand. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  34. UNCTAD. 2000. World Investment Report 2000: Cross-border mergers and acquisitions and development. New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
  35. Vermeulen, V., & Barkema, H. 2001. Learning through acquisition. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3): 457–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Woo, Y., & Zhang, K. 2006. China goes global: The implications of Chinese outward direct investment for Canada. Vancouver: Asia–Pacific Foundation of Canada.Google Scholar
  37. Wortzel, L. 2008. Testimony before the subcommittee on crime, terrorism and homeland security of the house committee on the judiciary hearing on enforcement of federal espionage laws, January 29.Google Scholar
  38. Wu, F. 2005. The globalization of corporate China. The National Bureau of Asian Research Analysis, 16(3).Google Scholar
  39. Young, M., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G., & Jiang, Y. 2008. Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal–principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1): 196–220.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Business and EconomicsWestern Washington UniversityBellinghamUSA
  2. 2.Segal Graduate School of Business, Faculty of Business AdministrationSimon Fraser UniversityVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations